尤庵宋時(shí)烈的義理思想研究
本文選題:義 切入點(diǎn):宋時(shí)烈 出處:《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:尤庵宋時(shí)烈(1607~1689)是17世紀(jì)朝鮮王朝的性理學(xué)者,哲學(xué)家,思想家,政治家。尤庵宋時(shí)烈主要繼承和發(fā)揮了朱子,栗谷,沙溪的學(xué)說(shuō)。在其中對(duì)尤庵影響最大的就是朱子的朱子學(xué),尤庵在12歲時(shí)受父親的影響尊重栗谷、崇尚朱子,終生致力于實(shí)踐朱子的道學(xué)和孔子的義理,在文學(xué)方面自研究成一個(gè)體系。眾所周知,尤庵留下的《宋子大全》由236本102冊(cè)組成。尤庵宋時(shí)烈一生中研究最深的思想就是孟子的"浩然章",宋時(shí)烈根據(jù)"浩然章"的中心思想—"直"思想為背景來(lái)闡發(fā)義理思想。我國(guó)對(duì)韓國(guó)哲學(xué)的研究也逐漸興起,但關(guān)于宋時(shí)烈的哲學(xué)思想研究尚屬冷門,研究專著甚為有限,即便是在國(guó)內(nèi)出版的韓國(guó)哲學(xué)綜合專著里也少有提及。通過(guò)韓文文獻(xiàn)資料的查閱與分析,認(rèn)為宋時(shí)烈之義理思想雖然對(duì)朝鮮有著很深刻的影響,但究其本質(zhì),并不可以簡(jiǎn)單將這種思想與朝鮮的立國(guó)思想等同起來(lái)。事實(shí)上,從文獻(xiàn)史料看來(lái),宋時(shí)烈的義理思想毋庸質(zhì)疑表達(dá)了宋時(shí)烈對(duì)明朝的真實(shí)情感,但對(duì)于朝鮮統(tǒng)治者來(lái)說(shuō),宋時(shí)烈之義理思想只被作為一種政治手段與對(duì)外政策。到目前為止國(guó)內(nèi)的有些學(xué)者也認(rèn)為宋時(shí)烈之義理思想僅僅是一種政治手段和對(duì)外政策而已。甚至有些國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者將宋時(shí)烈的義理思想等同于朝鮮的國(guó)家思想和對(duì)外政策,并認(rèn)為朝鮮當(dāng)時(shí)的立國(guó)思想直接采用由朱熹正統(tǒng)論為基礎(chǔ)的義理思想。朝鮮肅宗為報(bào)明朝"再造之恩"積極計(jì)劃了北伐,尤庵是提倡北伐論的第一個(gè)人。尤庵為了整頓并治理國(guó)家提出了自己的義理思想。在當(dāng)時(shí)的歷史性狀況下,尤庵的一生都在為實(shí)踐義理思想而奮斗。這一點(diǎn)無(wú)論是在內(nèi)容方面還是在規(guī)模方面都體現(xiàn)了與前人不同的獨(dú)到之處。尤庵的這種精神仍是當(dāng)今社會(huì)應(yīng)銘記的價(jià)值。義理是以天理為基礎(chǔ)并依據(jù)人普遍具有的規(guī)范原理認(rèn)識(shí)到人的當(dāng)行之道,同時(shí)在現(xiàn)實(shí)中通過(guò)持續(xù)的自我革新與社會(huì)批判進(jìn)行實(shí)踐。義理思想的終極目標(biāo)在于現(xiàn)實(shí)道德價(jià)值與物質(zhì)價(jià)值的和諧。如無(wú)視其本質(zhì)只偏執(zhí)于道德性,就會(huì)忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)的實(shí)用性,最終成為產(chǎn)業(yè)化經(jīng)濟(jì)成長(zhǎng)的阻礙因素。相反,若忽視道德性而一味強(qiáng)調(diào)經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,則會(huì)喪失人的尊嚴(yán)性并造成價(jià)值觀顛倒,最終會(huì)引起更大的災(zāi)難。在歷史的發(fā)展進(jìn)程中我們很容易發(fā)現(xiàn)這種弊端,這些都不能成為義理思想的本質(zhì),對(duì)此我們應(yīng)該加以批判。因此我們應(yīng)該在確保人的人格性和主體性基礎(chǔ)上努力實(shí)現(xiàn)與物質(zhì)的和諧統(tǒng)一。在物質(zhì)與本能至上的現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中,相信義理思想的這一本質(zhì)會(huì)成為克服諸多社會(huì)弊病的動(dòng)力和源泉,并把積極的影響主動(dòng)應(yīng)用到現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中以提高我們的生活品質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Yu an, Song Dynasty, 1607 and 1689) was a scholar, philosopher, thinker and politician of the Korean dynasty in the 17 th century.Yu an Song martyr mainly inherited and brought into play Zhu Zi, Li Gu, Shaxi doctrine.Among them, Zhu Zi's Zhu Zi was the most influential to you an. At the age of 12, Yu'an respected Li Gu and worshipped Zhu Zi. He devoted his whole life to practicing Zhu Zi's Taoism and Confucius' righteousness, and studied himself into a system in literature.As is known to all, the Song Zi Biography left by you an is made up of 236 books and 102 copies.Yu an Song Shilie's deepest research thought in his life was Mencius'"Hao ran Zhang", and Song Shilie elucidated his theory of justice according to the central idea of "Hao ran Zhang"-"Zhi" thought.The study of Korean philosophy in our country is also rising gradually, but the research on Song Shi-lie 's philosophy thought is still a cold one, and the monographs are very limited, even in the comprehensive monographs of Korean philosophy published in China, they are seldom mentioned.Through the reference and analysis of Korean literature, it is concluded that although Song Shi-lie 's thought of righteousness and reason has a profound influence on North Korea, the essence of the thought cannot be simply equated with the thought of the founding of the state of Korea.As a matter of fact, from the historical documents, Song Shi-lie 's thought of righteousness and theory expressed the true emotion of Song Shilie to the Ming Dynasty without any doubt, but for the Korean rulers, the thought of righteousness and reason of Song Shi-lie was only regarded as a political means and foreign policy.Up to now, some domestic scholars also think that Song Shi-lie 's theory of justice is only a kind of political means and foreign policy.Even some scholars at home and abroad equate Song Shi-lie 's thought of righteousness and reason with the national thought and foreign policy of Korea, and think that the thought of establishing the state of Korea at that time directly adopts the thought of righteousness and theory based on Zhu Xi's orthodoxy.The Korean Suzong actively planned the Northern Expedition for the Ming Dynasty, Youan was the first person who advocated the Northern Expedition.You an in order to rectify and govern the country put forward their own ideas of justice.Under the historical condition at that time, you an all his life is in practice justice thought and struggle.This point both in terms of content and in the size of the embodiment of the previous people are different from the original.This kind of spirit of you an is still the value that the society should remember today.The principle of righteousness is based on the theory of God and according to the principle of norms that people generally have, and at the same time through continuous self-innovation and social criticism to practice in reality.The ultimate goal of the thought of righteousness and reason lies in the harmony between realistic moral value and material value.If we ignore its essence, we will ignore the practicability of economy and become the obstacle factor of industrialization economic growth.On the contrary, neglecting morality and emphasizing economic problems will lead to the loss of human dignity and the reversal of values, which will eventually lead to even greater disaster.In the course of historical development, we can easily find this kind of malpractice, which cannot become the essence of the thought of righteousness and reason, and we should criticize it.Therefore, we should strive to achieve harmony and unity with matter on the basis of ensuring the personality and subjectivity of human beings.In the modern society of material and instinct supremacy, it is believed that the essence of the thought of righteousness and reason will become the motive force and source to overcome many social ills, and apply the positive influence to the real life actively in order to improve our quality of life.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:B312
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 楊雨蕾;;18世紀(jì)朝鮮北學(xué)思想探源[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期
2 孫衛(wèi)國(guó);試論朝鮮王朝尊明貶清的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];史學(xué)月刊;2004年06期
3 張志強(qiáng);朱熹的理學(xué)思想及評(píng)介[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年02期
4 陳正夫;朱熹哲學(xué)思想的基本范疇和邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);1988年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 張國(guó)洪;吳澄的象數(shù)義理之學(xué)[D];山東大學(xué);2006年
2 祁潤(rùn)興;義理易學(xué)研究[D];中國(guó)人民大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 劉倩;《佛說(shuō)四十二章經(jīng)》義理研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2013年
2 郝忠維;《正統(tǒng)道藏》編纂研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年
3 郗程;沒(méi)有落伍的“落伍”斗士[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年
4 李璐;論曾國(guó)藩的義理之學(xué)[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年
5 宮鍵;論尤庵宋時(shí)烈的春秋義理觀[D];延邊大學(xué);2009年
6 鄧銳;魏晉正統(tǒng)觀念研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年
7 李少華;試論戴震義理之學(xué)[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年
8 王智汪;論戴震的義理之學(xué)[D];云南師范大學(xué);2005年
9 劉貴軍;范曄的正統(tǒng)思想研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年
10 周丙華;《毛詩(shī)故訓(xùn)傳》義理初探[D];山東師范大學(xué);2005年
,本文編號(hào):1716392
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/1716392.html