本文選題：“盡心知性”章　切入點(diǎn)：《大學(xué)》解　出處：《孔子研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：朱子、陽明、牟宗三對《孟子》"盡心知性"章都有詳盡的論述。朱子是知行相須的《大學(xué)》解,以盡心知性為知,存心養(yǎng)性為行,夭壽不貳、修身以俟為智之盡、仁之至,其失在從認(rèn)知角度解盡心不合孟子的義理框架。陽明是知行合一的《中庸》解,將此章比配為生知安行的圣人工夫、學(xué)知利行的賢人工夫以及困知勉行的學(xué)者工夫,其失在如此比配使此章失去了在成德實(shí)踐中的普遍意義。牟宗三則是修身立命的《孟子》解,在道德實(shí)踐中證知本心真性,在存心養(yǎng)性中事天無違,從而挺立正命、超越氣命,其失一在以心、性、天為本體上是一,不知通過工夫也可實(shí)現(xiàn)是一,二在以盡心知性與存心養(yǎng)性對應(yīng)于積極工夫與消極工夫,不解其有創(chuàng)業(yè)工夫與守成工夫之別。
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi, Yang Ming, and Mou Zongsan have detailed exposition on the chapter of Mencius. Zhu Zi is a "university" solution that requires knowledge and action. Zhu Zongsan takes the heart and mind as his knowledge, saves his heart and nourishes his character as a line, does not fail to live his life, as soon as he is trained to become the best of his wisdom, and to be benevolent to the end of his life. Yangming is the "mean" solution of the unity of knowledge and action. This chapter is compared to the sage's work of living, knowing and doing safely, the work of the sages who learn to know what to do and the work of scholars who are reluctant to learn and practice. The loss of this chapter has lost its universal significance in the practice of Chengde. Mou Zongsan is a "Mencius" solution of self-cultivation and fatalism. In moral practice, he proves the true nature of the mind, and does not violate the nature in the nature of keeping the mind, thus standing upright and transcending the life of Qi. Its loss depends on the heart, sex, and heaven as the Noumenon. It can also be realized by the unknown through the work. Second, it corresponds to the positive time and the negative time with the best understanding and the saving nature, and does not understand the difference between the pioneering work and the preserving time.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)儒學(xué)高等研究院;
【分類號】：B222
，

本文編號：1689544