本文選題：藥品缺陷 + 缺陷標準��； 參考：《南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：藥品安全關(guān)系到人們的健康和生命安全,但是藥品并不具有絕對的安全性,俗話說“是藥三分毒”,近些年來因為藥品的不安全性給人們帶來的損害越來越多,其中因藥品缺陷給人們帶來的損害也屢見不鮮,對于該類事件的處理還存在諸多困惑,本文將以此為背景對藥品缺陷侵權(quán)責(zé)任進行研究�；谖覈F(xiàn)行的法律法規(guī)和司法實踐,對比國內(nèi)外的立法和判例,筆者將模塊化分析藥品缺陷侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 筆者將藥品侵權(quán)責(zé)任分為概述、構(gòu)成要件、歸責(zé)原則、責(zé)任承擔(dān)四大模塊進行研究。第一塊,概述中運用文獻研究法,結(jié)合法律規(guī)定,對藥品侵權(quán)責(zé)任的相關(guān)概念作了簡要敘述,并且對文章研究內(nèi)容的內(nèi)涵進行了界定；第二塊,構(gòu)成要件中,運用文獻研究法,結(jié)合我國法律規(guī)定,參照國外立法,按照藥品缺陷的類型,分類討論了不同類型的藥品缺陷的判斷標準,并且著重探討了藥品侵權(quán)責(zé)任中因果關(guān)系證明方法；第三塊,采用國內(nèi)外對比研究的方法,將美國、德國與我國藥品侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則進行比較研究,針對我國統(tǒng)一歸責(zé)原則的不足,參照美國立法,提出按缺陷類型分別適用不同歸責(zé)原則的設(shè)計；第四塊,主要運用文獻研究、個案分析等研究方法,結(jié)合法律理論和司法實務(wù),著重探討我國藥品侵權(quán)責(zé)任主體、責(zé)任分擔(dān)、免責(zé)等方面存在的問題。 筆者通過對藥品侵權(quán)責(zé)任進行模塊化研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)了我國現(xiàn)行法律適用和司法實踐中存在的各種問題,表明現(xiàn)行的產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律法規(guī)已經(jīng)不能滿足藥品責(zé)任的法律適用需求。為了克服這些問題,筆者在文章最后提出通過出臺《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法司法解釋》的完善立法方式,解決當(dāng)下藥品責(zé)任領(lǐng)域面臨的問題,并且給出了一些具有針對性的建議。
[Abstract]:Drug safety is related to people's health and life safety, but drugs do not have absolute safety. As the saying goes, "drug triple-poison" has caused more and more damage to people in recent years because of the unsafety of drugs. The damage caused by drug defects to people is also common. There are still many puzzles about the handling of this kind of incidents. This paper will study the tort liability of drug defects against this background. Based on the current laws and regulations and judicial practice, the author will analyze the tort liability of drug defects by modularization. The author divides drug tort liability into four modules: summary, constitutive elements, imputation principle and responsibility bearing. In the first part, the author makes a brief description of the related concepts of drug tort liability, and defines the connotation of the research content in the summary. In the second part, the author uses the literature research method in the constitutive elements. Combined with the laws and regulations of our country, referring to the foreign legislation, according to the types of drug defects, this paper discusses the judgment criteria of different types of drug defects, and emphatically discusses the causality proof method in drug tort liability. By using the method of comparative study at home and abroad, this paper makes a comparative study on the principle of imputation of drug infringement in the United States, Germany and China. The author puts forward the design of applying different imputation principles according to the types of defects. The fourth part mainly uses the methods of literature study and case analysis, combining with the legal theory and judicial practice, to discuss the main body of the drug tort liability and the sharing of the responsibility in our country. The problems existing in such aspects as exemption from liability. Through the modularization study of drug tort liability, the author finds out all kinds of problems existing in the current law application and judicial practice in our country, and shows that the current product liability laws and regulations can no longer meet the legal application needs of drug liability. In order to overcome these problems, the author puts forward a perfect legislative method of "Judicial interpretation of Tort liability Law" to solve the problems in the field of drug liability, and gives some specific suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：R95

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊益峰;楊立英;;藥品不良反應(yīng)的民事責(zé)任和救濟機制思考[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2007年04期

2 陳會平;;疫苗不良反應(yīng)損害救濟及其路徑選擇[J];保險研究;2011年06期

3 趙西巨;論藥品的警示缺陷責(zé)任[J];法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年03期

4 廖煥國;;醫(yī)療機構(gòu)連帶承擔(dān)藥品缺陷責(zé)任之質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué)評論;2011年04期

5 秦雯;馮璩;陶婷婷;;從曲美事件看我國藥品召回制度的完善措施[J];法制與社會;2011年07期

6 宋躍晉;;基于法學(xué)視角的藥品損害及賠償責(zé)任[J];法制與社會;2012年01期

7 g，

本文編號：1780801