中低度近視眼患者LASIK和LASEK術(shù)前術(shù)后視覺質(zhì)量的臨床對(duì)比研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of LASIK and LASEK on visual quality of patients with moderate and low myopia by comparing visual contrast sensitivity (CS) before and after operation. Methods: 52 patients (104 eyes) with low myopia were randomly divided into LASIK group and LASEK group with 26 eyes (52 eyes) in each group. Routine visual acuity, objective optometry, non-contact intraocular pressure, anterior segment, fundus and corneal topography were performed before operation, visual acuity, objective optometry, non-contact intraocular pressure and anterior segment examination were performed 1 m, 3 m, 6 m and 12 m after operation. The contrast sensitivity test card (F.A.C.T) of Optec 6500 visual examination instrument was used to examine the CSVA values of night, peripheral glare and diurnal glare before and after operation. Results: in the 1.LASEK group, Haze; was found in 10.71% of the patients after operation. Postoperative visual acuity: there was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA between LASEK group and LASIK group (p0.05). Contrast sensitivity test: (1) compared with pre-operation, the CSVA values of each spatial frequency range in LASIK group were significantly lower than those before operation (p0.01). At 3 m after operation, it decreased at 6 frequency range (P < 0.05), and the other spatial frequency segments were significantly lower than those before operation (p0.01), but there was no significant difference in CSVA between 6 m and 12 m after operation (p0.05). (2) compared with pre-operation, the CSVA value of each spatial frequency band in LASEK group was significantly lower than that before operation (p0.01), and at 3 m after operation, CSVA value in 1.5 frequency band was significantly lower than that before operation (p < 0.01). The frequency range of 3 was lower than that before operation (p0.05), but there was no significant difference between other spatial frequencies and preoperative frequency (p0.05). There was no significant difference in CSVA values between LASIK group and LASEK group (p0.05); (3) at 6 m and 12 m after operation (p0.05 CSVA). There was no significant difference in CSVA between LASIK group and LASEK group before operation (p0.05). Compared with LASEK group, the CSVA value of each spatial frequency segment in LASIK group was significantly different from that before operation at 3m after operation (p0.05), but there was no significant difference in CSVA value between the two groups at 1 m, 6 m and 12 m after operation (p0.05). Conclusion: (1) 10.71% of patients with moderate and low myopia have Haze, after LASEK, which indicates that there is a risk of Haze in patients with middle and low myopia after LASEK surgery. (2) whether LASEK or LASIK, is selected in patients with middle and low myopia. There was no significant difference between the uncorrected visual acuity after operation and the best corrected visual acuity before operation, but the postoperative visual acuity could be improved significantly. (3) the visual contrast sensitivity (CSVA) of patients with moderate and low myopia was lower than the preoperative level at 1 month and 3 months after LASIK or LASEK, and returned to the preoperative level at 6 months. (4) compared with LASEK group, there was no significant difference in visual contrast sensitivity (CSVA) between LASIK group and LASIK group at 1 month after operation. From 1 month after operation, the spatial frequency of contrast sensitivity in LASEK group was higher than that in LASIK group. The visual contrast sensitivity (CSVA) of each spatial frequency segment in LASIK group was larger than that in LASEK group at 3 months after operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:R779.63
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李澤宜,辜美山,施勉,高創(chuàng)仲;準(zhǔn)分子激光角膜切削術(shù)治療高度、超高度近視眼術(shù)后角膜上皮下混濁的遠(yuǎn)期觀察[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2004年03期
2 沈政偉;周和政;尹禾;吳金桃;李麗;;Q值引導(dǎo)個(gè)體化LASIK治療近視臨床療效評(píng)價(jià)[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2005年06期
3 宋偉瓊;譚淺;夏朝華;;正常人對(duì)比敏感度的特征[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2007年04期
4 胡學(xué)斌;江萍;莫純堅(jiān);陳麗華;;大齡近視患者LASEK臨床分析[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2008年03期
5 張立軍;張巖;蔣華;;Q值引導(dǎo)個(gè)體化LASEK與常規(guī)LASEK治療近視及散光的對(duì)比研究[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2010年03期
6 朱超;宋躍;;視覺對(duì)比敏感度的臨床應(yīng)用[J];眼科新進(jìn)展;2006年06期
7 張立軍;張巖;王佼佼;蔣華;;SBK與LASIK治療高度近視眼患者的臨床對(duì)比研究[J];眼科新進(jìn)展;2010年06期
8 宋文熹,石紅,,曾凡宇,周述禮,干雪梅,游光華,李金海;激光視覺對(duì)比敏感度測(cè)定儀的研制與應(yīng)用[J];中華眼底病雜志;1994年02期
9 嚴(yán)宗輝,胡建榮,古洵清,孫勉,楊麗瓊;準(zhǔn)分子激光原位角膜磨鑲術(shù)后近視患者對(duì)比敏感度的變化[J];中華眼科雜志;2002年11期
10 畢宏生;對(duì)比敏感度在眼科的臨床應(yīng)用[J];中華眼科雜志;2004年09期
本文編號(hào):2476821
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/yank/2476821.html