本文選題：高血壓基底節(jié)區(qū)腦出血 + 經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路��； 參考：《山西醫(yī)科大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:對比研究經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路與經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路手術治療高血壓基底節(jié)區(qū)腦出血的療效為臨床上外科治療術式選擇上提供循證醫(yī)學依據(jù)。方法:通過計算機檢索中國知網(wǎng)、萬方醫(yī)學、中國文獻數(shù)據(jù)庫(CBM和中文科技期刊數(shù)據(jù)庫(維普網(wǎng)),收集國內公開發(fā)表的比較經(jīng)側裂-島葉和顳葉皮層入路的隨機對照試驗(RCT)檢索時限為建庫至2014.12。并逐一進行文獻質量評價和資料提取。文獻的質量評價參考Coachrane協(xié)作網(wǎng)提供Rev Man5.1軟件進行Meta分析。結果:最終共納入19個病例-對照研究,共計1609例受試者,其中包括806例經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路行手術治療的患者和803例經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路治療的患者,Meta分析的結果顯示:①GOS:TR組的近期預后高于TE組,其差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[0R=2.15,95%CI(1.37,3.37),P=0.0009];②ADL:TR組的遠期預后高于TE組,其差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[0R=2.81,95%CI(2.05,3.86),P0.0001];③術后并發(fā)癥:TR組的遠期預后高于TE組,其差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[0R=0.34,95%CI(0.24,0.49),P0.00001]④再出血:TR組的術后再出血低于TE組,其差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[0R=0.35,95%CI(0.19,0.66),P=0.001];⑤死亡率:TR組的死亡率低于TE組,其差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[0R=0.35,95%CI(0.20,0.62),P=0.0003]。結論:現(xiàn)有臨床研究資料顯示:(1)經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路與經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路對患者在術后6個月以內、12個月以后預后的影響,經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路手術治療的病人不良預后發(fā)生率要低于經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路術后的病人。(2)經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路較經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路手術治療高血壓基底節(jié)區(qū)腦出血術后并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率、再出血發(fā)生率、術后死亡率有所下降。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the therapeutic effects of lateral fissure-insular approach and temporal cortex approach in the treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: a computer search was carried out on the Chinese Medicine of Zhiwang, Wanfang Medicine, The search time of CBM and Chinese Journal of Science and Technology (CBM) and Chinese Journal of Science and Technology (WIP), which were collected and published in China, were compared with the RCTs of lateral fissure and temporal lobe cortex pathway. The retrieval time of RCTs was built up to December 12, 2014. And one by one literature quality evaluation and data extraction. The quality evaluation of the literature refers to the Coachrane cooperation network to provide Rev Man5.1 software for Meta analysis. Results: a total of 19 case-control studies were conducted, with a total of 1609 subjects. A meta-analysis of 806 patients with lateral fissure / insular approach and 803 patients with transtemporal cortex approach showed that the short-term prognosis of the 1 GOS: tr group was higher than that of the te group. There was significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the two groups [0.37 ~ 3.37 ~ 0.0009] the long term prognosis of ADL: tr group was higher than that of te group, and the difference was statistically significant [0R 2.81 ~ 95CII 2.05V 3.86P0.0001] 3. The long term prognosis in the + tr group was higher than that in the te group, and the long-term prognosis was higher in the + tr group than in the te group, and there was a significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the two groups (P 0.0001), and the long-term prognosis was higher in the + tr group than in the te group. The difference was statistically significant [0RU 0.3495 CIQ 0.240.49 / P 0.00001] 4 the postoperative rebleeding in the rebleeding TR group was lower than that in the te group, and the difference was statistically significant [0RRU 0.35,95CI0.190.66 P0. 001] 5 the mortality rate in the% tr group was lower than that in the te group, and the difference was statistically significant [0RU 0.35% 95CI 0.20 0. 62P0.0003]. Conclusion: the available clinical data show that the effect of translateral fissure / insular approach and transtemporal cortex approach on the prognosis of patients within 6 months and 12 months after operation. The incidence of adverse prognosis was lower in patients treated with lateral fissure and insular approach than that in patients undergoing transtemporal cortex approach (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse prognosis was lower than that in patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage via transtemporal cortex approach than that in patients with hypertensive basal ganglion intracerebral hemorrhage treated by transtemporal cortex approach. Incidence of complications, The incidence of rebleeding and postoperative mortality decreased.
【學位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R651.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 朱新洪,胡繼實,羅宗晚,張克云,金麗花;鎖孔入路內窺鏡輔助高血壓腦出血血腫清除37例分析[J];南華大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2001年06期

2 陳旭;耿翔;;腦出血的研究現(xiàn)狀和治療進展[J];中華老年心腦血管病雜志;2009年12期

3 許亦群;儀立志;賈軍;葉宇;劉政委;陳委;尹夕龍;石小峰;;經(jīng)外側裂入路小骨窗血腫清除術治療高血壓基底節(jié)區(qū)出血療效觀察[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2014年02期

4 奚少東;劉民;周勤偉;徐斌權;;經(jīng)側裂-島葉入路顯微外科手術治療基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血的療效[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2014年24期

5 饒芝國;劉宗明;閆昕;;超早期經(jīng)外側裂-腦島入路與經(jīng)顳葉皮層入路手術治療基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血療效比較[J];實用醫(yī)學雜志;2008年15期

6 徐閱;彭燈明;蔣軍;;聯(lián)合應用早期腦室外引流法和腰大池引流法治療高血壓腦出血破入腦室的療效觀察[J];當代醫(yī)藥論叢;2014年13期

7 林日才;南志勇;;高血壓腦出血破入腦室57例外科治療[J];現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結合雜志;2012年10期

8 張松;廖振南;;高血壓腦出血的外科治療新進展[J];醫(yī)學綜述;2011年23期

9 黃戈;李智斌;伍益;丁曉;古機泳;;經(jīng)外側裂鎖孔入路手術治療殼核高血壓腦出血[J];中國醫(yī)藥導報;2009年30期

，

本文編號：1874130