【摘要】：目的調(diào)查不同地區(qū)青年男性進(jìn)藏后急性高原反應(yīng)(AMS)的發(fā)生情況,探討不同地區(qū)人群高原環(huán)境適應(yīng)能力的醫(yī)學(xué)地理學(xué)差異。方法對(duì)從不同地區(qū)進(jìn)入高原的青年男性AMS發(fā)生情況進(jìn)行整群抽樣調(diào)查,參照軍用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),采用AMS癥狀學(xué)評(píng)分法對(duì)其進(jìn)行分度與評(píng)分。為區(qū)分不同地理環(huán)境差異,對(duì)人員生活所在地自然地理因素進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)聚類分析,并用非參數(shù)檢驗(yàn)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證。采用單因素方差分析研究不同地區(qū)青年男性AMS癥狀評(píng)分的差異。結(jié)果根據(jù)聚類分析結(jié)果將研究對(duì)象生活所在地分為5個(gè)地區(qū),各組地理指標(biāo)之間差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01)。研究顯示不同地區(qū)人群AMS的發(fā)生率存在顯著差異(P0.05),其中地區(qū)2人員的AMS發(fā)生率顯著高于地區(qū)3、4、5(P0.05)。地區(qū)2人員頭痛發(fā)生率為82.8%,與地區(qū)3、4、5比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),乏力和嗜睡癥狀發(fā)生率分別為72.4%、27.6%,與地區(qū)5比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),惡心、嘔吐癥狀發(fā)生率為37.9%,與地區(qū)3比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。地區(qū)1和地區(qū)3人員眼花癥狀發(fā)生率與地區(qū)5比較差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論不同地區(qū)人群AMS的發(fā)生存在明顯醫(yī)學(xué)地理差異,不同地區(qū)人群對(duì)高原的適應(yīng)能力有所不同,來自低海拔地區(qū)人群的AMS癥狀較高海拔地區(qū)人群重。應(yīng)根據(jù)人群地域差異采取有針對(duì)性的AMS防護(hù)措施。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the occurrence of acute high altitude reaction (AMS) in young men from different regions and to explore the difference of their medical geography in adapting to environment in different regions. Methods the incidence of AMS in young men from different areas to plateau was investigated by cluster sampling. According to the military standard, AMS symptom scoring method was used to grade and score it. In order to distinguish the difference of different geographical environment, the author makes a systematic cluster analysis of the natural geographical factors in the place where the personnel live, and verifies it by non-parametric test. Univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to study the difference of AMS symptom score among young men in different areas. Results according to the results of cluster analysis, the living places of the subjects were divided into 5 regions, and the differences among the geographical indexes were statistically significant (P0.01). The results showed that there was significant difference in the incidence of AMS among different population groups (P0.05), and the incidence of AMS in area 2 was significantly higher than that in area 3 (P0.05). The incidence of headache in area 2 was 82.8, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The incidence of fatigue and somnolence were 72.4% and 27.662%, respectively. Compared with area 5, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 37.9, and the difference was statistically significant compared with area 3 (P0.05). The incidence of eye symptom in area 1 and 3 was significantly different from that in area 5 (P0.05). Conclusion there are obvious medical geographical differences in the occurrence of AMS in different areas, and the adaptability of different populations to the plateau is different. The AMS symptoms of people from low altitude areas are heavier than those from high altitude areas. AMS protection measures should be taken according to the regional differences of population.
【作者單位】： 第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)高原軍事醫(yī)學(xué)系軍事醫(yī)學(xué)地理學(xué)教研室、高原醫(yī)學(xué)教育部重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室、全軍高原醫(yī)學(xué)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金(41201090)~~
【分類號(hào)】：R188

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 黃慶愿;高鈺琪;劉福玉;牟信兵;周其全;蔣春華;翟羽;;急性高原反應(yīng)相關(guān)因素的多元線性回歸分析[J];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

2 薛華菊;方成江;;高原人體生理適應(yīng)學(xué)理論在進(jìn)藏旅游中的應(yīng)用[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2011年02期

3 高振華;林偉仁;楊云華;;高原旅行的衛(wèi)生保健——寫在青藏鐵路建成通車之際[J];旅行醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);2006年02期

4 戴霄曄;王錚;劉濤;;我國高原健康環(huán)境評(píng)估[J];山地學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 蔣月榮;進(jìn)藏旅游要了解高原反應(yīng)[N];中國醫(yī)藥報(bào);2007年

2 胡娟邋王超 王啟軍;您適合去西藏嗎[N];健康報(bào);2007年

3 付勇勝 王俊;注重人文關(guān)懷 厚愛“拼命三郎”[N];中國測繪報(bào);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2357352