多孔結(jié)構(gòu)鈦種植體對周圍骨組織應力分布影響的三維有限元分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-31 11:51
【摘要】：背景:鈦種植體因其彈性模量遠高于周圍骨組織,而易在種植體周圍產(chǎn)生應力遮蔽效應,造成種植體周的骨吸收和骨萎縮。為減輕鈦種植體的應力遮蔽效應,許多學者通過在鈦種植體中構(gòu)建骨樣多孔結(jié)構(gòu),以降低種植體的彈性模量。研究表明多孔結(jié)構(gòu)為骨細胞黏附和生長提供了更多的空間和表面積,提高骨結(jié)合率,具有優(yōu)良的生物相容性。此外,良好的生物力學性能也是種植體成功的關鍵。三維有限元分析法是國內(nèi)外研究種植體生物力學性能的有效方法之一。目的:本實驗在課題組前期研究基礎上,通過分析內(nèi)部實心外部不同孔隙率的鈦種植體在不同力學負荷作用下對不同類型的骨質(zhì)應力分布的影響,以進一步評估多孔結(jié)構(gòu)鈦種植體的生物力學性能,從而為不同孔隙率的內(nèi)芯致密外層多孔結(jié)構(gòu)的鈦種植體的臨床應用提供力學參考依據(jù)。方法:1.建立Ⅲ類骨骨塊、上頜第一前磨牙牙冠模型、基臺與種植體模型,種植體分為實心、孔隙率30%中央支柱1.5mm、孔隙率30%中央支柱3.1mm、孔隙率40%中央支柱1.5mm、孔隙率40%中央支柱3.1mm五組,分別合面中央窩施加150N垂直力,在頰尖舌斜面施加50N側(cè)向力、模擬極限合力(軸向114.6N,頰舌向17.1N,近遠中向23.4N),評估不同負荷下多孔結(jié)構(gòu)鈦種植體周圍骨的應力分布情況。2.建立Ⅰ類骨、Ⅱ類骨、Ⅲ類骨、Ⅳ類骨骨塊模型,種植體分組同方法1,模擬極限合力加載,評估多孔結(jié)構(gòu)鈦種植體對不同類型骨質(zhì)的應力分布情況。結(jié)果:1.實心種植體和多孔結(jié)構(gòu)種植體在不同類型骨組織中的應力分布模式相似,即垂直加載下應力集中區(qū)域主要位于種植體頸部周圍的皮質(zhì)骨,呈環(huán)形分布,.側(cè)向力加載下周圍骨組織應力集中在頸部頰側(cè)皮質(zhì)骨,種植體中段及下段周圍骨組織所受應力較為均勻。2.隨著孔隙率的增加,種植體周圍骨組織的高峰應力值面積相應減少,當孔隙率達到40%時,高峰應力值面積減少得更為明顯。3.不同力學負荷加載下,各組模型中均觀察到多孔鈦種植體骨界面所承受的最大應力值要大于實心結(jié)構(gòu)種植體。種植體周圍骨組織的最大應力值均位于種植體頸部的皮質(zhì)骨;且隨著施加力學負荷的增大,各組種植體周圍骨組織的最大應力也相應增大。側(cè)向力加載下的種植體周圍骨界面所承受的最大應力值要遠高于垂直力加載下所受的應力。4.隨著種植體多孔層孔隙率的增加,種植體骨界面的最大應力值增加;相同孔隙率的多孔鈦種植體,多孔層越厚,即中間支柱直徑越小時,其骨界面所受最大應力值越大。5.無論是實心還是多孔結(jié)構(gòu)種植體,其周圍骨組織最大應力值隨著骨質(zhì)的變化而變化,Ⅳ類骨Ⅲ類骨Ⅱ類骨Ⅰ類骨。結(jié)論:1.不同力學負荷加載下,各組模型中均觀察到多孔鈦種植體周圍骨組織所承受的最大應力值要大于實心結(jié)構(gòu)種植體,且隨著孔隙結(jié)構(gòu)的增多,種植體周圍骨組織所受應力也隨之增大。無論是實心還是多孔結(jié)構(gòu)種植體,其周圍骨組織最大應力值均隨著骨質(zhì)的變化而變化,骨質(zhì)密度越低,種植體周圍骨組織所承受的最大應力值越大。側(cè)向力對種植體周圍骨組織所產(chǎn)生的應力比垂直力大。2.骨質(zhì)越致密,咬合力越小時,多孔結(jié)構(gòu)相對實心結(jié)構(gòu)更有利于應力向周圍骨組織傳導,增加種植體周圍骨組織所承受的應力,以抵消應力遮蔽。3.骨質(zhì)越疏松,咬合力力值越大時,對多孔結(jié)構(gòu)種植體的使用越要謹慎,嚴格控制側(cè)向力及過大咬合力,以防止病理性載荷的產(chǎn)生。
[Abstract]:BACKGROUND: Titanium implants are prone to produce stress shielding effect around the implants because their elastic modulus is much higher than that of the surrounding bone tissues, resulting in bone resorption and bone atrophy. The results show that the porous structure provides more space and surface area for osteocyte adhesion and growth, improves bone binding rate and has excellent biocompatibility. In addition, good biomechanical properties are also the key to the success of implants. Based on the previous research of our research group, the effects of different internal and external porosity of titanium implants on the stress distribution of different types of bone under different mechanical loads were analyzed in order to further evaluate the biomechanical properties of porous titanium implants, so as to compact the inner core and outer porous structure with different porosity. Methods: 1. Establish three kinds of bone mass, maxillary first premolar crown model, abutment and implant model. The implants were divided into five groups: solid, porosity 30% central pillar 1.5mm, porosity 30% central pillar 3.1mm, porosity 40% central pillar 1.5mm, porosity 40% central pillar 3.1mm. A 150 N vertical force was applied to the central fossa and a 50 N lateral force was applied to the oblique surface of the buccal tip and tongue to simulate the ultimate resultant force (114.6N in the axial direction, 17.1N in the buccal and tongue direction, 23.4N in the near and far directions). Results: 1. The stress distribution patterns of solid and porous titanium implants in different types of bone tissues were similar, i. e. the stress concentration area was mainly located in the cortical bone around the neck of the implant under vertical loading. 2. With the increase of porosity, the area of peak stress value of bone tissue around the implant decreases correspondingly. When the porosity reaches 40%, the area of peak stress value decreases more obviously. Under the same mechanical loading, it was observed that the maximum stress on the bone interface of porous titanium implants was greater than that on solid implants. The maximum stress at the bone interface around the implant under lateral loading is much higher than that under vertical loading. 4. With the increase of the porosity of the implant porous layer, the maximum stress at the bone interface increases; the thicker the porous layer, the larger the diameter of the intermediate pillar, the thicker the porous titanium implant with the same porosity. The maximum stress on the bone interface increases with the change of bone mass in both solid and porous implants. Conclusion: 1. Bone tissue around porous titanium implants was observed under different mechanical loads. The maximum stress of the bone around the implant increases with the increase of the pore structure. The maximum stress of the bone around the implant changes with the change of the bone mass, the lower the bone density, and the bone tissue around the implant bears the stress. The greater the maximum stress, the greater the stress produced by the lateral force on the bone tissue around the implant than the vertical force. 2. The denser the bone, the smaller the occlusal force, the more conducive the porous structure to stress transmission to the surrounding bone tissue than the solid structure, increasing the stress of the bone tissue around the implant to offset the stress shielding. 3. The more loose the bone, the less occlusal force. The greater the force value, the more cautious the use of porous structure implants, strictly control the lateral force and excessive occlusal force to prevent the occurrence of pathological load.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R783.6
[Abstract]:BACKGROUND: Titanium implants are prone to produce stress shielding effect around the implants because their elastic modulus is much higher than that of the surrounding bone tissues, resulting in bone resorption and bone atrophy. The results show that the porous structure provides more space and surface area for osteocyte adhesion and growth, improves bone binding rate and has excellent biocompatibility. In addition, good biomechanical properties are also the key to the success of implants. Based on the previous research of our research group, the effects of different internal and external porosity of titanium implants on the stress distribution of different types of bone under different mechanical loads were analyzed in order to further evaluate the biomechanical properties of porous titanium implants, so as to compact the inner core and outer porous structure with different porosity. Methods: 1. Establish three kinds of bone mass, maxillary first premolar crown model, abutment and implant model. The implants were divided into five groups: solid, porosity 30% central pillar 1.5mm, porosity 30% central pillar 3.1mm, porosity 40% central pillar 1.5mm, porosity 40% central pillar 3.1mm. A 150 N vertical force was applied to the central fossa and a 50 N lateral force was applied to the oblique surface of the buccal tip and tongue to simulate the ultimate resultant force (114.6N in the axial direction, 17.1N in the buccal and tongue direction, 23.4N in the near and far directions). Results: 1. The stress distribution patterns of solid and porous titanium implants in different types of bone tissues were similar, i. e. the stress concentration area was mainly located in the cortical bone around the neck of the implant under vertical loading. 2. With the increase of porosity, the area of peak stress value of bone tissue around the implant decreases correspondingly. When the porosity reaches 40%, the area of peak stress value decreases more obviously. Under the same mechanical loading, it was observed that the maximum stress on the bone interface of porous titanium implants was greater than that on solid implants. The maximum stress at the bone interface around the implant under lateral loading is much higher than that under vertical loading. 4. With the increase of the porosity of the implant porous layer, the maximum stress at the bone interface increases; the thicker the porous layer, the larger the diameter of the intermediate pillar, the thicker the porous titanium implant with the same porosity. The maximum stress on the bone interface increases with the change of bone mass in both solid and porous implants. Conclusion: 1. Bone tissue around porous titanium implants was observed under different mechanical loads. The maximum stress of the bone around the implant increases with the increase of the pore structure. The maximum stress of the bone around the implant changes with the change of the bone mass, the lower the bone density, and the bone tissue around the implant bears the stress. The greater the maximum stress, the greater the stress produced by the lateral force on the bone tissue around the implant than the vertical force. 2. The denser the bone, the smaller the occlusal force, the more conducive the porous structure to stress transmission to the surrounding bone tissue than the solid structure, increasing the stress of the bone tissue around the implant to offset the stress shielding. 3. The more loose the bone, the less occlusal force. The greater the force value, the more cautious the use of porous structure implants, strictly control the lateral force and excessive occlusal force to prevent the occurrence of pathological load.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R783.6
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 危小燕;;細胞水平骨組織吸收和沉積[J];國外醫(yī)學.生物醫(yī)學工程分冊;1989年02期
2 孫磊;全逸先;;《骨組織庫管理》標準出臺 我國骨組織庫管理邁出第一步[J];中國衛(wèi)生標準管理;2010年05期
3 李章;;骨組織的無機和有機成分在~(239)钚代謝中的作用[J];國外醫(yī)學參考資料(放射醫(yī)學分冊);1978年03期
4 王金華;用非損傷方法研究長期低動態(tài)條件下骨組織的狀態(tài)[J];航天醫(yī)學與醫(yī)學工程;1988年02期
5 危小燕;;碰撞骨組織微觀力學模型[J];國外醫(yī)學.生物醫(yī)學工程分冊;1989年02期
6 楊耀林,沈陽;介紹一種骨組織快速制片法[J];臨床與實驗病理學雜志;1992年03期
7 孫慶妹,金巖,常青,楊連甲;微波技術在牙齒和骨組織標本制備中的應用[J];實用口腔醫(yī)學雜志;1993年04期
8 談勤明,朱靜;骨組織快速制片改良法[J];江西醫(yī)學院學報;2004年06期
9 姜秀英，賴晃文，楊傳紅，江悅?cè)A，，劉連璞;含骨組織的電鏡樣品制備技術探討[J];第一軍醫(yī)大學學報;1995年02期
10 陳元棟,陳同鈺,虞華明,萬曉莉;骨組織脫鈣的超聲處理[J];江西醫(yī)藥;2001年04期
相關會議論文 前10條
1 葉銘;張紹祥;王成燾;;力學虛擬人骨組織曲面模型重建及有限元建模技術[A];第八屆全國生物力學學術會議論文集[C];2006年
2 王軍;呂榮;;圖象融合重疊技術在骨組織顯微圖象采集中的應用[A];第十一屆中國體視學與圖像分析學術會議論文集[C];2006年
3 彭若龍;錢夢
本文編號：2214900
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/kouq/2214900.html
最近更新
教材專著
