【摘要】：目的:探索軀體癥狀障礙(Somatic Symptoms Disorder,SSD)在中國三甲綜合醫(yī)院門診中的患病率,并描述軀體癥狀障礙患者的癥狀負擔、心理特征、生活質(zhì)量,探索生活質(zhì)量預測因素;驗證軀體癥狀障礙診斷B標準量表(Somatic Symptoms Disorder-12,SSD-12)的信效度,為軀體癥狀障礙提供量化評估工具。方法:分別在消化內(nèi)科、中醫(yī)科、心理科連續(xù)納入患者,分別使用國際神經(jīng)精神科簡式訪談問卷(MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview,M.I.N.I)進行 ICD-10 精神與行為障礙分類(International Classification of Diseases-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders)軀體形式障礙(Somatoform disorder,SFD)診斷、DSM-5(The Diagnostic and Statis-tical Manual of Mental Disorders,Fifth Edition,精神障礙診斷與統(tǒng)計手冊,第五版)臨床定式檢查(structured clinical interview for DSM-5,research version,SCID-5)進行軀體癥狀障礙診斷,并使用軀體癥狀嚴重程度量表(Patient Health Questionnaire-15,PHQ-15)、軀體癥狀量表-8(Somatic Symptom Scale-8,SSS-8)評估軀體癥狀嚴重程度,使用抑郁癥狀嚴重程度量表(Patient Health Questionnaire-9,PHQ-9)、廣泛性焦慮量表(General Anx-iety Disorder-7,GAD-7)評估焦慮、抑郁水平,使用健康相關(guān)焦慮評定(Whiteley-8 Scale,WI-8)評估健康焦慮,軀體癥狀障礙診斷B標準量表(Somatic Symptom Disorder-12,SSD-12)用于評估軀體癥狀障礙診斷標準的B標準,使用 WHO DAS 2.0(WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)評估殘疾程度,使用 12 項健康調(diào)查簡表(The medical outcome study 12-item short form health survey,SF-12)評估健康相關(guān)生活質(zhì)量。結(jié)果:1)三個科室各收集到50份有效問卷,22.0%的患者滿足軀體癥狀障礙診斷標準,50.7%的患者滿足未分化軀體形式障礙診斷標準,軀體癥狀障礙與軀體形式障礙診斷一致性不高(cohen k指數(shù)=0.217,p=0.001);2)SSD患者PHQ-15總分、PHQ-9總分、GAD-7總分、WI-8總分、SSS-8總分、SSD-12、DAS總分顯著高于僅滿足SFD的患者及一般就診人群,就診次數(shù)顯著高于其他兩組患者,就診滿意度及主觀感受的療效、PCS、MCS均顯著低于僅滿足SFD的患者及一般就診人群,三個科室的SSD患者未見顯著性差異;3)PHQ-9總分為殘疾程度的顯著預測因素,方程可解釋的變異為56.4%[F=30.842,p=0.001,VIF(variance inflation factor,方差膨脹因子)3.5];SSD-12總分、SSS-8總分、過去6個月是否治療是PCS的顯著預測因素,可解釋的變異為 50.1%(F=23.948,p=0.001,VIF3.5);已婚、GAD-7 總分、PHQ-9總分、就診次數(shù)是MCS的顯著預測因素,可解釋的變異為65.5%(F=22.513,p=0.001,VIF3.5),納入SSD-12后三個方程R2變化量均大于納入PHQ-15 時。4)SSD-12在本人群中信度高(Cronbach α=0.953),驗證性因子分析提示SSD-12認知、情緒、行為的三因子模型擬合度尚能接受[n=150,CFI(Comparative Fit Index)=0.990,TLI(Tucker-Lewis Index)=0.987,REMSEA(Root Mean Square Error of Approximation)=0.094,90%CI(Confidence interval)=0.072-0.116],但3個潛變量呈強相關(guān)性,使用SSD-12總分作為單因子模型擬合度在可接受范圍(n=150,CFI=0.989,TLI=0.987,REMSEA=0.094,90%CI=0.072-0.115),可反映總體心理困擾程度;SSD-12與軀體癥狀嚴重程度(PHQ-15,r=0.520、SSS-8,r=0.596)、健康焦慮(WI-8,r=0.781)、焦慮、抑郁水平(r=0.605及r=0.658)顯著相關(guān),區(qū)分效度欠佳;以SCID-5作為SSD診斷的金標準,SSD-12作為SSD篩查工具,在本樣本人群中診斷界值為17(約登指數(shù)=0.595,敏感度=0.757,特異度=0.838),可正確診斷82.0%的患者;結(jié)論:1.綜合醫(yī)院心理科、消化科、中醫(yī)科三個科室門診患者SSD患病率為22.0%;2.軀體癥狀障礙患者軀體癥狀嚴重程度、焦慮抑郁水平、健康焦慮水平高,就診次數(shù)多,就診主觀感受差,精神健康及軀體健康相關(guān)生活質(zhì)量差,殘疾程度高;3.SSD-12信度良好,三因子模型擬合度尚能接受,但因子之間相關(guān)性太強;量表總分能反映患者軀體癥狀困擾的嚴重程度,并預測患者的生活質(zhì)量及殘疾程度;SSD-12篩查軀體癥狀障礙界值為17;4.患者抑郁水平影響殘疾程度;SSD-12總分、近1周癥狀嚴重程度、過去6個月是否治療、焦慮抑郁水平、就診次數(shù)是健康相關(guān)生活質(zhì)量的影響因素,而軀體癥狀本身對健康相關(guān)生活質(zhì)量及殘疾程度影響不大,臨床干預應(yīng)著重于減輕患者癥狀相關(guān)的痛苦感、糾正患者對癥狀的認知扭曲、減少就診次數(shù),改善患者生活質(zhì)量,而不僅僅是消除癥狀。
[Abstract]:Objective: To explore the prevalence of somatic symptoms disorder (SSD) in the outpatient department of the Third-Class General Hospital of China, describe the symptoms burden, psychological characteristics, quality of life of the patients with SSD, explore the predictors of quality of life, and validate the Somatic Symptoms Disorder-12 (SSD-12). Methods: ICD-10 mental and behavioral disorders were classified by the International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, M.I.N.I) in the Department of Gastroenterology, Traditional Chinese Medicine and Psychology. Diagnosis of Somatoform disorder (SFD), DSM-5 (The Diagnostic and Statis-tical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Diagnostic and Statis tical Manual of Mental Disorders, Handbook of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Constructed Clinical Interview for DSM-5) 5, research version, SCID-5) for the diagnosis of somatic symptoms disorders, and use the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) to assess the severity of somatic symptoms, using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a wide range of General Anx-iety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) was used to assess anxiety and depression levels, Whiteley-8 Scale (WI-8) was used to assess health anxiety, and Somatic Symptom Disorder-12 (SSD-12) was used to assess the diagnostic criteria for somatic symptomatic disorders. WHO DAS 2.0 (WHO) was used to assess the diagnostic criteria for somatic symptoms. Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 assessed disability and health-related quality of life using 12-item short form health survey (SF-12). The diagnostic consistency between somatoform disorder and somatoform disorder was not high (cohen K index = 0.217, P = 0.001); 2) The total score of PHQ-15, PHQ-9, GAD-7, WI-8, SSS-8, SSD-12, DAS in SSD patients were significantly higher than those in SFD patients and the general population. In the other two groups, PCS and MCS were significantly lower than those who only satisfied SFD and the general population, and there was no significant difference among the SSD patients in the three departments; 3) The total score of PHQ-9 was a significant predictor of disability, and the explanatory variance of the equation was 56.4% [F = 30.842, P = 0.001, VIF (variance inflation fac) Total score of SSD-12, total score of SSS-8, whether treatment was a significant predictor of PCS in the past six months, the explanable variance was 50.1% (F = 23.948, P = 0.001, VIF3.5); married, GAD-7 total score, total score of PHQ-9, the number of visits was a significant predictor of MCS, and the explanable variance was 65.5% (F = 22.513, P = 0.001, VIF3.5) after inclusion in SSD-12. The variance of R2 in the three equations was greater than that in PHQ-15. 4) SSD-12 had a high reliability in this population (Cronbach alpha = 0. 953). Confirmative factor analysis suggested that the three-factor model of cognition, emotion and behavior of SSD-12 was acceptable [n = 150, CFI (Comparative Fit Index) = 0. 990, TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index) = 0. 987, REMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Behavior). Roximation = 0.094,90% CI (Confidence interval) = 0.072-0.116], but the three latent variables were strongly correlated, using the total score of SSD-12 as a single factor model fit within the acceptable range (n = 150, CFI = 0.989, TLI = 0.987, REMSEA = 0.094, 90% CI = 0.072-0.115), can reflect the overall psychological distress; SSD-12 and the severity of physical symptoms (PHQ-15, r = 0.520, S = 0, S = 0.989). SS-8, r = 0.596, health anxiety (WI-8, r = 0.781), anxiety and depression levels (r = 0.605 and R = 0.658) were significantly correlated with poor discriminatory validity; with SCID-5 as the gold standard for SSD diagnosis, SSD-12 as the SSD screening tool, the diagnostic threshold value was 17 (Yorden index = 0.595, sensitivity = 0.757, specificity = 0.838) in this sample population, 82.0% of patients could be correctly diagnosed; Conclusion: 1. The prevalence of SSD was 22.0%. 2. The severity of somatic symptoms, the level of anxiety and depression, the level of health anxiety were high in patients with somatic symptoms disorders, the number of visits was high, the subjective feeling was poor, the quality of life related to mental and physical health was poor, and the degree of disability was high. The reliability was good, the three-factor model fit was acceptable, but the correlation between the factors was too strong; the total score of the scale could reflect the severity of somatic symptoms, and predict the quality of life and disability of patients; the threshold of SSD-12 screening for somatic symptoms was 17; 4. Depression level of patients affected the degree of disability; SSD-12 total score, the severity of symptoms in the past week. Severity, treatment, anxiety and depression levels, and number of visits over the past six months are the influencing factors of health-related quality of life, while physical symptoms themselves have little effect on health-related quality of life and disability. Clinical intervention should focus on alleviating symptoms-related pain, correcting cognitive distortion of symptoms and reducing visits. Number, improve the quality of life of patients, not just eliminate symptoms.
【學位授予單位】：北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R749

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜海英，，王耀華，李培軒;軀體癥狀與抑郁[J];四川精神衛(wèi)生;1996年S1期

2 吳創(chuàng)鴻,鄧啟文;慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者軀體癥狀的相關(guān)因素分析[J];中華傳染病雜志;2000年02期

3 李月梅;劉燕京;徐萬成;;應(yīng)屆高專畢業(yè)生軀體癥狀的心理歸因[J];中國現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥雜志;2006年04期

4 張育平;;軀體癥狀焦慮抑郁病人的護理[J];福州總醫(yī)院學報;2008年02期

5 許又新;;癔癥的軀體癥狀[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2009年05期

6 葉瑞繁;耿慶山;區(qū)麗明;陳劍;張美蘭;董春玲;朱春燕;;綜合醫(yī)院門診病人焦慮、抑郁與軀體癥狀的關(guān)聯(lián)研究[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2009年04期

7 葉瑞繁;耿慶山;區(qū)麗明;陳劍;張美蘭;董春玲;李河;;心內(nèi)科門診患者軀體癥狀與焦慮、抑郁的相關(guān)分析[J];嶺南心血管病雜志;2013年01期

8 宮媛;劉榮;賀納斯;李紅政;;女性新兵軀體癥狀對心理健康的影響[J];華南國防醫(yī)學雜志;2013年03期

9 鄒文華,張宏根,何杏桃;癔癥與正常人社會心理因素及個性和軀體癥狀對照研究[J];中國神經(jīng)精神疾病雜志;1999年03期

10 鄧以洪;軀體癥狀病因心理健康測驗分析一例報告[J];廣東衛(wèi)生防疫;1999年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 謝有權(quán);;不明原因軀體癥狀伴焦慮、疼痛等23例患者的診斷治療[A];2007年浙江省精神病學學術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2007年

2 楊歡;;抑郁癥軀體癥狀及其相關(guān)因素分析[A];中華醫(yī)學會第九次全國物理醫(yī)學與康復學學術(shù)會議論文集[C];2007年

3 胡永東;林穎娜;閆雪;房捷欣;;中醫(yī)對抑郁癥伴發(fā)軀體癥狀發(fā)生機制的有效因素分析[A];第六屆全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合心身醫(yī)學學術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2012年

4 Xiaomei Peng;William Montgomery;Diego Novick;Jaume Aguado;Zbigniew Kadziola;Roberto Brugnoli;Josep Maria Haro;;中國三個月前瞻性觀察研究抑郁癥患者軀體癥狀的預后影響[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十次全國精神醫(yī)學學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2012年

5 周民敘;;心理社會因素與軀體癥狀[A];第五屆全國老年醫(yī)學進展學術(shù)會議論文集[C];2005年

6 張清芬;;3例住院精神病患者合并軀體癥狀的分析[A];河南省精神科康復護理培訓班及學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2009年

7 周為;;以軀體癥狀為主的抑郁癥的述情障礙[A];中國心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會第五屆學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2007年

8 彭東蘭;;以軀體癥狀為主要表現(xiàn)的兒童情緒障礙32例臨床分析[A];第七屆全國（內(nèi)地、港、澳）“兒童發(fā)育與行為科學”研討會論文集[C];2004年

9 李惠春;M.Y.Zhang;G.Wang;H.Zhang;H.Y.Zhang;Y.Liu;M.Li;C.P.Zhang;J.S.Tang;W.Y.Wu;P.Singh;A.Burns;J.Raskin;Q.Q.Ang;;中國抑郁障礙病人疼痛性軀體癥狀流行病學調(diào)查[A];2009年浙江省醫(yī)學會精神病學學術(shù)年會暨浙江省醫(yī)師協(xié)會精神科醫(yī)師分會第二屆年會論文匯編[C];2009年

10 程源深;;Hysteria[A];2009年浙江省神經(jīng)病學學術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 靖九江;情緒癥狀與軀體癥狀雙重治療[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2007年

2 薛原;七成抑郁癥患者伴有軀體癥狀[N];健康報;2007年

3 健康時報記者 趙紹華;七成抑郁癥患者有軀體癥狀[N];健康時報;2007年

4 中南大學湘雅二醫(yī)院精神衛(wèi)生研究所教授 趙靖平;抑郁患者多伴發(fā)疼痛[N];健康報;2007年

5 德文;透過現(xiàn)象看本質(zhì)[N];衛(wèi)生與生活報;2003年

6 市精神衛(wèi)生中心心理咨詢室 陳琴;考前“焦慮”可以克服[N];三峽日報;2006年

7 何茜;胃病可能是抑郁惹的禍[N];醫(yī)藥養(yǎng)生保健報;2006年

8 北京市衛(wèi)生局精神干預網(wǎng)絡(luò)中心;非典心理熱線咨詢小結(jié)[N];北京日報;2003年

9 湖南省腦科醫(yī)院 李小林 劉磊;癔癥———模仿大師[N];大眾衛(wèi)生報;2005年

10 依圖;眼睛有病 腸胃不適[N];衛(wèi)生與生活報;2007年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉辰;多軀體癥狀患者的心理及行為特點[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學院;2013年

2 柯巖;原發(fā)性干燥綜合征患者軀體癥狀及外周血NKT細胞調(diào)節(jié)機制研究[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學院;2015年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 崔飛環(huán);軀體癥狀障礙患者的心理行為特征[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學院;2017年

2 胡光勇;首次針刺對抑郁癥軀體癥狀改善效應(yīng)觀察[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

3 黃龍秀;頑固性功能性便秘患者軀體癥狀分類的規(guī)律研究及治療[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

4 廖莎;抑郁性障礙患者的抑郁體驗人格研究[D];中南大學;2010年

5 盧妍妍;伴軀體癥狀的抑郁癥皮質(zhì)醇與述情障礙的相關(guān)性研究[D];鄭州大學;2013年

6 鄭美;抑郁癥軀體癥狀歸經(jīng)的臨床研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學;2013年

7 陳寶泯;捏脊療法調(diào)治亞健康軀體癥狀的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2013年

8 郝曉慧;抑郁癥軀體癥狀與督脈壓痛點相關(guān)性研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學;2014年

9 吳丹;維持性血液透析患者抑郁情緒和軀體癥狀調(diào)查分析[D];汕頭大學;2009年

10 周磊;抗抑郁藥物結(jié)合認知行為療法治療伴軀體癥狀抑郁癥的療效分析[D];吉林大學;2013年

本文編號：2222679