【摘要】：目的:1、探討肝臟特異性對比劑釓塞酸二鈉(GD-EOB-DTPA)增強肝臟MR肝膽期不同肝功能狀態(tài)攝取對比劑差異,評價不同肝功能狀態(tài)肝功能。2、GD-EOB-DTPA增強肝臟MR肝膽期評價肝癌經動脈導管化療栓塞(TACE)術后及肝癌微波固化術后對局部肝功能影響。方法:1、研究對象:回顧性分析50例局灶性病變患者,均行Gd—EOB—DTPA磁共振動態(tài)增強掃描,男45例,女5例,年齡25-76歲,平均年齡(54.2±12.8)歲。其中肝硬化患者32例,非肝硬化患者18例。納入標準:局灶性病變,病灶最大徑小于10cm;病例影像及臨床生化資料齊全,能獲得一般資料及Child—Pugh分級評分所需指標。排除標準:嚴重運動偽影;肝臟彌漫性占位;嚴重腎功能不全。2、檢查方法:MRI檢查采用Siemens Trio Tim 3.0T超導型磁共振掃描儀,體部相控陣線圈,患者取仰臥位,將上腹部置于體部線圈的中央。磁共振掃描序列包括T2WI橫斷位、T2WI抑脂橫斷位、T1WI正反相位、擴散加權成像(DWI)、3D擾相容積序列(VIBE)抑脂橫斷位、VIBE抑脂動態(tài)三期增強及延遲20min VIBE抑脂肝膽期。避免呼吸運動偽影,掃描前作屏氣訓練,掃描時為囑患者深吸氣后屏氣。3、肝硬化患者按Child—Pugh分級法行肝功能分級,其中Child—Pugh A級21例,Child—Pugh B級9例,Child—Pugh C級2例。非肝硬化病例中無肝、腎基礎疾病,肝、腎功能生化檢查正常者作為正常對照組,入組7例。4、分析不同肝功能狀態(tài)肝膽期肝臟攝取造影劑能力差異;分析肝癌經動脈導管化療栓塞(TACE)術后及肝癌微波固化術后肝膽期病灶周邊肝實質與平均肝實質信號增強程度(IS%)差異。結果:1、正常對照組與Child-Pugh A級、Child—Pugh B級、Child—Pugh C級組間肝實質信號增強程度(IS%)有顯著差異(P0.05);2、Child-Pugh A級與Child—Pugh B級、Child—Pugh C級組間肝實質信號增強程度(IS%)有顯著差異(P0.05);3、Child—Pugh B級、Child—Pugh C級組增強程度(IS%)無明顯差異(P=0.24);4、1例肝癌介入術后病灶及2例肝癌微波固化術后病灶周圍肝實質IS%較平均肝實質IS%明顯減低,13例病灶灶周肝實質IS%較平均肝實質IS%無明顯差異(P=0.37)。結論:1、不同功能狀態(tài)肝細胞攝取對比劑程度不同,正常對照組、Child-Pugh A級、Child—Pugh B級組隨肝功能下降,GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強肝膽期肝臟信號增強程度減低。2、GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強肝膽期對顯示Child—Pugh B級、Child—Pugh C級組肝功能差異不敏感。3、GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強肝膽期可以顯示肝癌經動脈導管化療栓塞(TACE)術后及肝癌微波固化術后局部肝功能情況,GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強肝膽期可以反映肝細胞功能及全肝功能,亦可反映局部肝功能。目的:與CT增強相比,探討肝臟特異性對比劑釓賽酸二鈉(GD-EOB-DTPA)增強MR在肝癌熱消融術后評價的臨床價值及優(yōu)勢。方法:1、研究對象:原發(fā)性肝癌熱消融治療患者,并具有CT增強及GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強隨訪資料。2、分析原發(fā)性肝癌熱消融術后患者GD-EOB-DTPA磁共振增強及CT增強影像資料。所有納入病例均行MR動態(tài)增強、延遲20min肝膽期成像及CT動態(tài)成像,對比分析GD-EOB-DTPA增強MRI評價肝癌熱消融術后復發(fā)的優(yōu)勢。結果:1、23例患者中有14例出現(xiàn)腫瘤復發(fā),9例無明顯腫瘤復發(fā),復發(fā)病灶中8例為單發(fā)病灶,6例為多發(fā),總共28個病灶,CT增強檢出病灶22個,GD-EOB-DTPA增強MRI共檢出病灶29個,其中一例術后診斷為小囊腫,肝膽期均為低信號,2、GD-EOB-DTPA增強MRI與CT增強對病灶診斷敏感性、特異性、陽性預測值、陰性預測值及診斷準確性分別為100%、90%、97%、100%、97%;71%、82%、91%、53%、74%,GD-EOB-DTPA動態(tài)MR增強評價肝癌熱消融術后復發(fā)各預測值均優(yōu)于CT增強。結論:GD-EOB-DTPA評價肝癌熱消融術后復發(fā)較CT增強具有明顯優(yōu)勢;對顯示小病灶、多發(fā)病灶具有顯著優(yōu)勢。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. To investigate the difference of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA in enhancing liver function at different stages of MR hepatobiliary phase, and to evaluate liver function at different stages of MR hepatobiliary phase. Methods: 1. Subjects: A retrospective analysis of 50 patients with focal lesions, Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scanning, 45 males, 5 females, age 25-76 years, average age (54.2 + 12.8) years. 32 patients with cirrhosis, 18 patients with non-cirrhosis. Exclusion criteria: severe motion artifacts; diffuse hepatic space occupancy; severe renal insufficiency. 2. Examination methods: MRI scan using Siemens Trio Tim 3.0T superconducting magnetic resonance scanner, body phased array coil, patients take supine position, will be upper abdomen MR scan sequence included T2WI transverse section, T2WI lipid suppression transverse section, T1WI positive and negative phase, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), 3D perturbation volume sequence (VIBE) lipid suppression transverse section, VIBE dynamic three-phase enhancement and delayed 20 min VIBE lipid suppression hepatobiliary phase. To instruct patients to hold their breath after deep breathing, liver cirrhosis patients were graded according to Child-Pugh grading method, including 21 cases of Child-Pugh A, 9 cases of Child-Pugh B and 2 cases of Child-Pugh C. Non-cirrhosis patients without liver, kidney diseases, normal liver and kidney function biochemical examination were selected as normal control group, and 7.4 cases were divided into two groups. Results: 1. The liver parenchyma of normal control group was different from that of C hild-Pugh A, C hild-Pugh B, C hild-Pugh C groups. Significant difference in signal enhancement (IS%) was found between C hild-Pugh A and C hild-Pugh B, C hild-Pugh C, and C hild-Pugh C groups (P 0.05). 3, C hild-Pugh B and C hild-Pugh C had no significant difference (P = 0.24). 4, 1 case of hepatocellular carcinoma and 2 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma were cured by microwave. The IS% of liver parenchyma around the lesion was significantly lower than the average IS% of liver parenchyma after operation, and the IS% of liver parenchyma around the lesion was not significantly different from the average IS% of liver parenchyma in 13 cases (P = 0.37). Conclusion: 1. The degree of contrast medium uptake by hepatocytes in different functional states was different in normal control group, Child-Pugh A group and Child-Pugh B group. Hepatobiliary phase signal enhancement was decreased. 2. GD-EOB-DTPA enhanced hepatobiliary phase was not sensitive to the difference of hepatic function in Child-Pugh B and Child-Pugh C groups. 3. GD-EOB-DTPA enhanced hepatobiliary phase could show the local hepatic function of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatocellular carcinoma after microwave curing. Objective: To investigate the clinical value and advantages of liver-specific contrast agent disodium gadolinate (GD-EOB-DTPA) in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after thermal ablation compared with CT enhancement. All patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with a 20-minute delay in hepatobiliary phase and dynamic CT imaging, and compared with GD-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma thermal ablation. Results: Of the 1,23 patients, 14 had recurrence, 9 had no obvious recurrence, 8 had single lesion, 6 had multiple lesions, a total of 28 lesions, 22 lesions were detected by CT enhancement, 29 lesions were detected by GD-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI, one of which was diagnosed as small cyst, low signal in hepatobiliary phase, 2, GD-EOB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of enhanced MRI and CT were 100%, 90%, 97%, 100%, 97%, 71%, 82%, 91%, 53%, 74%, respectively. The predictive value of GD-EOB-DTPA dynamic MR enhancement in evaluating the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after thermal ablation was better than that of CT enhancement. It has obvious advantages over CT enhancement, and has a significant advantage in showing small lesions and multiple lesions.
【學位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R735.7;R445.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 洪德飛,彭淑牖,童利民,李松英,蔡秀軍;半導體錐形散射激光局部熱消融肝組織的實驗研究[J];中華外科雜志;2003年11期

2 李猛;于曉玲;梁萍;;肺癌熱消融治療研究進展[J];中國醫(yī)學影像技術;2007年09期

3 考笑梅;鄧中山;劉靜;;腫瘤化學熱消融實驗裝置研制[J];航天醫(yī)學與醫(yī)學工程;2013年04期

4 廖遇平;靶向熱消融治療惡性腫瘤的現(xiàn)狀[J];中國現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學雜志;2004年03期

5 姜春林;匡銘;;肝癌熱消融治療引起免疫增強機制的研究進展[J];中國病理生理雜志;2011年05期

6 章建全;;經皮熱消融治療在甲狀腺乳頭狀癌及其區(qū)域淋巴結轉移中的應用前景[J];中華醫(yī)學超聲雜志(電子版);2014年08期

7 方和平;潘衛(wèi)東;林楠;劉波;李凱;;腹腔鏡下人工胸、腹水在特殊部位肝癌熱消融中的應用[J];中華臨床醫(yī)師雜志(電子版);2009年07期

8 蔣文超;劉星;向邦德;趙蔭農;;不同溫度熱消融小鼠皮下移植性肝癌的實驗研究[J];廣西醫(yī)學;2010年03期

9 李成利,武樂斌,陳立光,史浩,林征宇,Robert Blanco Sequneir;0.23T開放性磁共振實時引導下經皮激光熱消融術治療肝臟惡性腫瘤[J];中國介入影像與治療學;2004年01期

10 馮蕾,梁萍;肝癌微波治療療效的影像學評定及熱消融治療新進展[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2005年02期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 梁萍;董寶瑋;;微波熱消融技術在臨床應用進展[A];第九屆全國超聲醫(yī)學學術會議論文匯編[C];2006年

2 徐輝雄;劉琳娜;謝曉燕;呂明德;;人工胸腹水在超聲引導肝腫瘤熱消融中的應用[A];中國超聲醫(yī)學工程學會第八屆全國腹部超聲學術會議論文匯編[C];2010年

3 呂國榮;李伯義;李少輝;唐力;林惠通;吳秀明;胡詩音;;多種輔助方法對射頻熱消融效果影響作用的研究[A];慶祝中國超聲診斷50年暨第十屆全國超聲醫(yī)學學術會議論文匯編[C];2008年

4 朱才義;陳列;;超聲造影在肝癌熱消融治療中的應用價值[A];中國超聲醫(yī)學工程學會第八屆全國腹部超聲學術會議論文匯編[C];2010年

5 李成利;武樂斌;陳立光;史浩;林征宇;Robert Blanco Sequne;;0.23T開放性磁共振實時引導下經皮激光熱消融術治療肝臟惡性腫瘤[A];慶祝山東省醫(yī)學影像學研究所建所30周年學術論文專刊[C];2005年

6 李成利;武樂斌;Robert Blanco Sequneir;;開放性磁共振實時導引微創(chuàng)非血管介入肝腫瘤激光熱消融術[A];第二屆醫(yī)學影像山東論壇論文集[C];2005年

7 朱才義;;超聲造影在肝癌熱消融治療中的應用價值[A];中國超聲醫(yī)學工程學會第七屆全國腹部超聲學術會議學術論文匯編[C];2007年

8 于曉玲;曲鵬;梁萍;范瑾;程志剛;韓治宇;劉方義;于杰;;肝癌熱消融效果評價:超聲造影與核磁共振對比研究[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十三次全國超聲醫(yī)學學術會議論文匯編[C];2013年

9 經翔;;從循證醫(yī)學證據看肝癌熱消融的地位和挑戰(zhàn)[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十三次全國超聲醫(yī)學學術會議繼續(xù)教育課程[C];2013年

10 于曉玲;梁萍;董寶瑋;程志剛;王e，

本文編號：2208013