馬克·吐溫的代表作——《哈克貝利·芬歷險(xiǎn)記》是美國(guó)文學(xué)史上的里程碑,至今在美國(guó)文學(xué)界乃至世界文學(xué)界占有舉足輕重的席位�！豆素惱し覛v險(xiǎn)記》中有很多人物之間的對(duì)話,其特點(diǎn)主要表現(xiàn)為幽默、風(fēng)趣、諷刺、含義雋永。一方面,這些巧妙的對(duì)話不僅傳達(dá)小說(shuō)人物的目的,也深刻地表現(xiàn)人物的性格特點(diǎn)。另一方面,這些對(duì)話也在某種程度上反映了作者的主張。通過(guò)閱讀相關(guān)的著作、文獻(xiàn),作者發(fā)現(xiàn)以往對(duì)這本著作的研究多基于文學(xué)鑒賞,而較少運(yùn)用語(yǔ)用學(xué)理論對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析。因此,本文作者從語(yǔ)用學(xué)的角度來(lái)研究這本著作。 為了幫助讀者更好地理解《哈克貝利·芬歷險(xiǎn)記》,本文在以往語(yǔ)用學(xué)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,以格賴斯的合作原則為理論框架,采用定性分析和定量分析的方法,對(duì)《哈克貝利·芬歷險(xiǎn)記》中精選的29個(gè)典型對(duì)話進(jìn)行分析。 首先,本文簡(jiǎn)略介紹馬克·吐溫的生涯背景及其代表作《哈克貝利·芬歷險(xiǎn)記》。然后,文章回顧了眾學(xué)者對(duì)這本著作的研究。其次,本文簡(jiǎn)略介紹一些語(yǔ)用理論,并重點(diǎn)回顧了有關(guān)合作原則的國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。本文在第三部分介紹了格賴斯提出的合作原則即四準(zhǔn)則,即為了保證會(huì)話的順利進(jìn)行,談話雙方必須遵守一些原則,這為隨后分析《哈克貝利·芬歷險(xiǎn)記》中...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：74 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Study background
    1.2 Significance of the study
    1.3 Purpose of the study
    1.4 Study method
    1.5 Structure of the study
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 A brief review of Mark Twain
    2.2 A brief review of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
        2.2.1 A brief review of the novel
        2.2.2 Previous studies of the novel
    2.3 Previous studies of the cooperative principle
        2.3.1 Study abroad
        2.3.2 Study in China
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework for the Study
    3.1 Cooperative principle
    3.2 Violation of the cooperative principle
        3.2.1 Violating the maxim of quality
        3.2.2 Violating the maxim of quantity
        3.2.3 Violating the maxim of relevance
        3.2.4 Violating the maxim of manner
    3.3 Significance of the cooperative principle
    3.4 Summary
Chapter Four Analyses of Conversational Implicature in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    4.1 Violation of the quality maxim
        4.1.1 Rhetorical question
        4.1.2 Irony
        4.1.3 Metaphor
    4.2 Violation of the quantity maxim
        4.2.1 Understatement
        4.2.2 Overstatement
        4.2.3 Tautology
    4.3 Violation of the relevance maxim
        4.3.1 Giving association clues
        4.3.2 Giving hints
    4.4 Violation of the manner maxim
        4.4.1 Incomplete sentences
        4.4.2 Vague sentences
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings of the study
    5.2 Limitations and suggestions for the future study
References
Acknowledgements
攻讀學(xué)位期間發(fā)表的學(xué)術(shù)論文



本文編號(hào)：3807077