論《曼斯菲爾德莊園》的電影改編
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-07 18:38
【摘要】：電影年自1895年在法國誕生以來,就與文學(xué)作品有著密不可分的關(guān)系。簡·奧斯汀便是電影改編界盛久不衰的寵兒之一。作為19世紀(jì)英國文學(xué)史上家喻戶曉的女性作家之一,簡·奧斯汀的作品以獨(dú)特的女性視角、細(xì)膩的文字以及浪漫的情調(diào)而深受眾多讀者的喜愛。她的小說《曼斯菲爾德莊園》出版于1814年,并于1983年改編成電視短劇,于1999年和2007年改編成電影。然而小說本身的爭議性注定其電影改編之路也十分坎坷。 本文從電影改編的角度出發(fā),比較分析了《曼斯菲爾德莊園》的小說文本,1999年改編的電影版本以及2007年改編的電影版本,旨在從這兩部電影的背景改編、情節(jié)改編和人物改編三個(gè)角度探討這兩個(gè)電影改編之間,電影改編與小說文本之間的比較,對這兩部電影改編的目的、改編原因以及改編的社會文化意義進(jìn)行分析。 全文包括引言、正文和結(jié)語三個(gè)部分。引言主要介紹了作家作品,電影改編理論,國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,本文所采用的研究方法,本文研究的目的,以及本文的框架。 正文分為三章。第一章比較研究這兩部電影改編作品在背景改編,即社會背景與自然環(huán)境,這兩個(gè)方面改編的差異。羅茲碼1999年電影聚焦于廢除奴隸制的19世紀(jì)社會背景并與當(dāng)時(shí)的女權(quán)運(yùn)動相結(jié)合,因此整個(gè)電影是沉重的社會問題與較為陰暗的自然環(huán)境的結(jié)合。相比較而言,麥克唐納2007年的改編則充滿輕松浪漫的愛情喜劇精神,整個(gè)電影基調(diào)歡樂明快,呈現(xiàn)出與1999年電影版截然相反的氛圍。背景的改編為整個(gè)劇情的發(fā)展奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 第二章根據(jù)情節(jié)改編的三種方式,即情節(jié)刪減、情節(jié)增加和情節(jié)改變,主要探索了兩個(gè)電影改編版本在情節(jié)上的改編。三種方式都為各自的故事發(fā)展需要服務(wù),并在這些情節(jié)變動中展示出電影的社會背景與自然環(huán)境設(shè)置。在情節(jié)安排上,羅茲碼為強(qiáng)調(diào)奴隸制主題刪除了一個(gè)重要角色,增加了其他情節(jié)等,而麥克唐納則為譜寫浪漫的愛情故事改變了一些次要情節(jié)。這些情節(jié)改編反應(yīng)了電影的主題,顯示出改編者的改編目的,暗示了整個(gè)電影的色調(diào)。 第三章主要從人物改編這一角度分析了兩部改編作品中人物的外貌和人物的語言。例如,羅茲碼電影中的范尼·樸茨積極為女性身份奮爭,而麥克唐納電影中的范尼則是為愛情默默等待隱忍；因此,兩位導(dǎo)演為顯示出范尼·樸茨的個(gè)性特征安排了特定的人物視覺形象和語言。為了更好的在熒幕上展現(xiàn)他們的角色,兩位改編者都設(shè)計(jì)了適合他們電影主題的人物外貌與主題。電影從直觀上讓觀眾看到人物的外貌,聽到人物的語言。人物的視覺形象和語言的改編更加活躍了人物的外貌形象,深化了他們的性格特征,讓熒幕角色變得更為生動,更讓人印象深刻,推動了整個(gè)情節(jié)的發(fā)展,并且恰到好處地表達(dá)了改編者要向觀眾傳達(dá)的信息。 結(jié)論部分對全文進(jìn)行了綜述,并對簡·奧斯汀在電影界的受歡迎原因以及小說《曼斯菲爾德莊園》電影改編的原因進(jìn)行了深刻探討。羅茲碼和麥克唐納對《曼斯菲爾德莊園》這部小說做出了在背景、情節(jié)和人物三方面改編的不同選擇。然而,這樣的改編背后有其各自的原因,包括社會歷史條件,改編者對小說的不同闡釋,改編者想要達(dá)到的經(jīng)濟(jì)目的,以及考慮道觀眾是否能接受他們所做出的改編等等因素,這謝原因亦是其他文學(xué)作品在進(jìn)行文學(xué)改編時(shí)需要考慮的。同時(shí),論文指出,《曼斯菲爾德莊園》的電影改編豐富了簡·奧斯汀小說及電影的研究,影響學(xué)者們更深層次的理解和研究文學(xué)作品。此外,這部小說的電影改編也為其他的改編提供了借鑒,即,無論哪部改編作品都應(yīng)該考慮到觀眾的接受能力,不管是熟知文本的觀眾還是不熟知文本的觀眾。最后,本文指出了電影改編的社會與歷史、理論與現(xiàn)實(shí)的意義。
[Abstract]:Since its birth in France in 1895, the Year of the Movie has been closely related to literary works. Jane Austen is one of the most enduring darlings in film adaptation. As one of the most well-known female writers in the history of British literature in the 19th century, Jane Austen's works have a unique feminine perspective, exquisite writing and romantic feelings. Her novel Mansfield Manor was published in 1814, adapted into a TV short in 1983, and adapted into a movie in 1999 and 2007. However, the controversial nature of the novel itself is doomed to be a bumpy road to film adaptation.
From the point of view of film adaptation, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the novel version of Mansfield Manor, the film version adapted in 1999 and the film version adapted in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between film adaptation and novel text from the three perspectives of background adaptation, plot adaptation and character adaptation. Comparing the two films, the paper analyzes the purpose, the reasons and the social and cultural significance of the adaptation.
The introduction mainly introduces the author's works, the theory of film adaptation, the research status at home and abroad, the research methods adopted in this paper, the purpose of this study, and the framework of this paper.
The first chapter is a comparative study of the differences between the two film adaptation works in the background adaptation, namely, social background and natural environment. The 1999 film of Rhodes Code focuses on the social background of the abolition of slavery in the 19th century and combines with the feminist movement at that time, so the whole film is a heavy social problem and comparison. In contrast, McDonald's 2007 adaptation is full of light-hearted romantic romantic comedy, and the film's tone is lively, disparate from the 1999 edition. The adaptation of the background lays the foundation for the development of the whole plot.
Chapter Two explores the adaptation of the two film adaptation versions according to the three ways of plot adaptation, i.e. plot deletion, plot addition and plot change. Each of the three ways serves the needs of the story development and reveals the social background and natural environment settings of the film in these changes. Rhodes code deletes an important role and adds other plots to emphasize the subject of slavery, while MacDonald changes minor plots for romantic love stories. These plot adaptations reflect the theme of the film, reveal the purpose of the adapter, and suggest the tone of the film.
The third chapter mainly analyzes the appearance and language of the characters in the two adapted works from the perspective of character adaptation. For example, Fanny Potts in the Rhodes Code movies is actively fighting for female identity, while Fanny in the MacDonald movies is silently waiting for love to endure; therefore, the two directors are trying to show Fanny Potts'individuality. In order to better display their roles on the screen, the two adapters have designed the appearance and theme of the characters suitable for their film themes. The film lets the audience see the appearance of the characters and hear the language of the characters intuitively. The appearance of the characters deepens their personality characteristics, makes the screen characters more vivid and impressive, promotes the development of the whole plot, and properly expresses the message the adapter wants to convey to the audience.
The conclusion summarizes the full text and explores the reasons for Jane Austen's popularity in the film world and the reasons for her adaptation of the novel Mansfield Manor. There are various reasons behind such adaptation, including social and historical conditions, different interpretations of the novel by the adapter, the economic goals the adapter wants to achieve, and whether the Taoist audience can accept the adaptions they have made. This is also the reason why other literary works should be considered in literary adaptation. It points out that the film adaptation of Mansfield Manor enriches Jane Austen's novel and film studies, and influences scholars'deeper understanding and study of literary works. Finally, this paper points out the social and historical significance, theoretical and practical significance of film adaptation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：J905;I561.074
本文編號：2229097
[Abstract]:Since its birth in France in 1895, the Year of the Movie has been closely related to literary works. Jane Austen is one of the most enduring darlings in film adaptation. As one of the most well-known female writers in the history of British literature in the 19th century, Jane Austen's works have a unique feminine perspective, exquisite writing and romantic feelings. Her novel Mansfield Manor was published in 1814, adapted into a TV short in 1983, and adapted into a movie in 1999 and 2007. However, the controversial nature of the novel itself is doomed to be a bumpy road to film adaptation.
From the point of view of film adaptation, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the novel version of Mansfield Manor, the film version adapted in 1999 and the film version adapted in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between film adaptation and novel text from the three perspectives of background adaptation, plot adaptation and character adaptation. Comparing the two films, the paper analyzes the purpose, the reasons and the social and cultural significance of the adaptation.
The introduction mainly introduces the author's works, the theory of film adaptation, the research status at home and abroad, the research methods adopted in this paper, the purpose of this study, and the framework of this paper.
The first chapter is a comparative study of the differences between the two film adaptation works in the background adaptation, namely, social background and natural environment. The 1999 film of Rhodes Code focuses on the social background of the abolition of slavery in the 19th century and combines with the feminist movement at that time, so the whole film is a heavy social problem and comparison. In contrast, McDonald's 2007 adaptation is full of light-hearted romantic romantic comedy, and the film's tone is lively, disparate from the 1999 edition. The adaptation of the background lays the foundation for the development of the whole plot.
Chapter Two explores the adaptation of the two film adaptation versions according to the three ways of plot adaptation, i.e. plot deletion, plot addition and plot change. Each of the three ways serves the needs of the story development and reveals the social background and natural environment settings of the film in these changes. Rhodes code deletes an important role and adds other plots to emphasize the subject of slavery, while MacDonald changes minor plots for romantic love stories. These plot adaptations reflect the theme of the film, reveal the purpose of the adapter, and suggest the tone of the film.
The third chapter mainly analyzes the appearance and language of the characters in the two adapted works from the perspective of character adaptation. For example, Fanny Potts in the Rhodes Code movies is actively fighting for female identity, while Fanny in the MacDonald movies is silently waiting for love to endure; therefore, the two directors are trying to show Fanny Potts'individuality. In order to better display their roles on the screen, the two adapters have designed the appearance and theme of the characters suitable for their film themes. The film lets the audience see the appearance of the characters and hear the language of the characters intuitively. The appearance of the characters deepens their personality characteristics, makes the screen characters more vivid and impressive, promotes the development of the whole plot, and properly expresses the message the adapter wants to convey to the audience.
The conclusion summarizes the full text and explores the reasons for Jane Austen's popularity in the film world and the reasons for her adaptation of the novel Mansfield Manor. There are various reasons behind such adaptation, including social and historical conditions, different interpretations of the novel by the adapter, the economic goals the adapter wants to achieve, and whether the Taoist audience can accept the adaptions they have made. This is also the reason why other literary works should be considered in literary adaptation. It points out that the film adaptation of Mansfield Manor enriches Jane Austen's novel and film studies, and influences scholars'deeper understanding and study of literary works. Finally, this paper points out the social and historical significance, theoretical and practical significance of film adaptation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：J905;I561.074
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 廖為應(yīng);;從接受美學(xué)看電影《傲慢與偏見》[J];電影評介;2008年12期
，本文編號：2229097
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2229097.html
最近更新
教材專著
