本文選題：英雄主義　切入點(diǎn)：崇高　　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：荷馬史詩(shī)(《伊利亞特》和《奧德賽》)是歐洲文學(xué)的源頭,《三國(guó)演義》是中國(guó)第一部長(zhǎng)篇章回體小說(shuō)。作為世界文學(xué)史上兩部偉大的經(jīng)典作品,它們對(duì)后世的文化產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。兩部巨著都描述了波瀾壯闊的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),歌頌了杰出的英雄,洋溢著豪邁的英雄主義激情,具有很強(qiáng)的可比性。目前針對(duì)單個(gè)作品的國(guó)別文學(xué)研究數(shù)不勝數(shù),但是比較文學(xué)視野下對(duì)兩部作品的比較審視較少。本文擬采用比較文學(xué)的平行研究方法,運(yùn)用崇高和悲劇的相關(guān)美學(xué)理論,分析兩部作品中英雄主義崇高表現(xiàn),悲劇性審美特征及英雄主義的不同特點(diǎn),并對(duì)兩部作品的文化根源進(jìn)行探討。以崇高和悲劇理論對(duì)兩大作品中的英雄主義進(jìn)行比較研究是一個(gè)新的角度,有益拓展兩部作品的研究視野。 引言部分,首先對(duì)英雄及英雄主義定義進(jìn)行界定,概括了比較文學(xué)視角下的相關(guān)研究動(dòng)態(tài),運(yùn)用比較文學(xué)相關(guān)理論闡述了兩部作品的可比性,及本論文的研究方法和研究目的及意義。正文由四章組成。 第一章：梳理了西方美學(xué)史上不同歷史時(shí)期具有影響力的崇高理論,總結(jié)了崇高的內(nèi)涵和本質(zhì)。簡(jiǎn)述了悲劇的相關(guān)理論和審美因素。 第二章：分析了《三國(guó)演義》和《荷馬史詩(shī)》中英雄主義崇高的表現(xiàn)。英雄超人的能力體現(xiàn)了“力學(xué)崇高”,英雄的精神則體現(xiàn)了精神崇高。作者所高揚(yáng)的英雄主義精神彰顯了共同的人性,他們偉大的精神催人奮發(fā)。英雄主義崇高的本質(zhì)是人的超越精神。 第三章：探討《三國(guó)演義》和《荷馬史詩(shī)》中的英雄主義的相似的悲劇性審美特征。悲劇人物面臨不可調(diào)和的沖突,和命運(yùn)進(jìn)行頑強(qiáng)抗?fàn)?卻以毀滅而告終。他們的悲劇精神給審美主體帶來(lái)了悲壯的審美感受。 第四章：分析了兩部作品中英雄主義的差異,探討其背后深層的文化根源。英雄戰(zhàn)斗的個(gè)人動(dòng)機(jī)不同,兩種文化對(duì)英雄的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也不同。由于不同的地理環(huán)境和文化內(nèi)核的影響,《三國(guó)演義》中的英雄具有忠、義、仁的集體主義精神,而荷馬史詩(shī)中的英雄則具有更強(qiáng)的自我意識(shí),個(gè)人主義精神明顯。 結(jié)論部分總結(jié)本文,并重申了兩部作品比較研究的意義。兩部作品中的英雄主義都展現(xiàn)崇高和悲壯的特征,體現(xiàn)了人性不斷抗?fàn)�、不斷超越的本質(zhì),激起審美主體奮發(fā)向上的心理感受。兩部作品的英雄主義的比較,可以彰顯它們共同的審美特性及各自的特性和價(jià)值,另一方面通過(guò)異質(zhì)文學(xué)的互識(shí)、互鑒,可促進(jìn)異質(zhì)文化間的溝通和理解。中西方民族雖然所處的地域時(shí)代不同、文化傳統(tǒng)迥異,但仍然擁有共同的人性本質(zhì)及相互理解的心理基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Homer epics (Iliad and Odyssey) are the source of European literature, and Romance of the three Kingdoms is the first Chinese novel in the long chapter, which is regarded as two great classics in the history of world literature. They have had a profound impact on the culture of later generations. Both masterpieces describe magnificent wars, extol outstanding heroes, and brim with heroic heroism. There is a strong comparability. At present, there are too many national literature studies on a single work, but there are few comparative studies on the two works from the perspective of comparative literature. This paper intends to adopt the parallel research method of comparative literature. Based on the relevant aesthetic theories of sublime and tragedy, this paper analyzes the sublime expression, tragic aesthetic characteristics and different characteristics of heroism in the two works. The comparative study of heroism in the two works is a new angle, which is helpful to expand the research field of the two works. In the foreword, the author defines the definition of hero and heroism, generalizes the relevant research trends in the perspective of comparative literature, and expounds the comparability of the two works by using the relevant theories of comparative literature. And the research method, purpose and significance of this thesis. The text consists of four chapters. Chapter one: combing the influential loftiness theories in different historical periods in the history of western aesthetics, summing up the connotation and essence of sublime, and briefly describing the relevant theories and aesthetic factors of tragedy. The second chapter analyzes the heroism sublime in Romance of the three Kingdoms and Homer Epic. The superhero's ability embodies the "mechanics sublime", the hero's spirit embodies the spirit sublime. The spirit of the doctrine reveals the common humanity, Their great spirit stimulates the development of men. The sublime essence of heroism is the spirit of transcendence. The third chapter discusses the similar tragic aesthetic characteristics of heroism in Romance of the three Kingdoms and Homer Epic. The tragic characters face irreconcilable conflicts and struggle with fate. Their tragic spirit brings tragic aesthetic feelings to the aesthetic subject. Chapter 4th: analyzes the difference of heroism in the two works and explores the deep cultural roots behind it. Because of the influence of different geographical environment and cultural core, the heroes in the Romance of the three Kingdoms have the spirit of loyalty, righteousness, benevolence and collectivism. The hero in Homer epic has stronger self-consciousness and individualism spirit. The conclusion part summarizes this article, and reiterates the significance of the comparative study of the two works. The heroism in the two works shows the characteristics of sublimity and tragicality, which embodies the essence of human nature constantly fighting and surpassing. The comparison of heroism between the two works can reveal their common aesthetic characteristics and their respective characteristics and values, on the other hand, through the mutual recognition and mutual learning of heterogeneous literature, It can promote communication and understanding between different cultures. Although the Chinese and Western nations are in different regional times and cultural traditions, they still have the common essence of human nature and the psychological basis of mutual understanding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：I106;I0-03

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張振鈞;論《三國(guó)演義》的悲劇特質(zhì)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年05期

2 陳鵬錄;;《三國(guó)演義》與《伊利亞特》戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)描寫(xiě)比較[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年21期

3 龔群;荷馬史詩(shī)中的英雄倫理觀[J];道德與文明;2004年01期

4 趙成林;交相輝映的兩部民族戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)史詩(shī)——《三國(guó)演義》與《伊利亞特》比較研究[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);1994年03期

5 孫殿玲;《三國(guó)演義》中諸葛亮命運(yùn)悲劇根源初探[J];遼寧教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

6 藺學(xué)才;;命運(yùn)的創(chuàng)造、天神的杰作——解讀《伊利亞特》的死亡主題[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

7 周衛(wèi)忠;;個(gè)人主義是《伊利亞特》的主體文化精神[J];麗水學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

8 劉根勤;;向死而生:《三國(guó)演義》中英雄的生命意識(shí)[J];明清小說(shuō)研究;2008年02期

9 李時(shí)人;《三國(guó)演義》:史詩(shī)性質(zhì)和社會(huì)精神現(xiàn)象[J];求是學(xué)刊;2002年04期

10 陳穎;亂世英雄的道德光環(huán)與悲劇結(jié)局——論中國(guó)古代戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)小說(shuō)的英雄崇拜意識(shí)[J];求是學(xué)刊;2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1632622