本文關(guān)鍵詞：倫理批評(píng)視域中的《歷史人》研究　出處：《魯東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《歷史人》 文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng) 倫理危機(jī) 人與自我 人與他人 人與社會(huì)

【摘要】：英國(guó)作家馬爾科姆·布雷德伯里的代表性校園諷刺小說(shuō)《歷史人》（1975）自發(fā)表之日起便引起評(píng)論界的廣泛關(guān)注，但目前對(duì)該作品的研究多局限于對(duì)其語(yǔ)言及敘事風(fēng)格等的評(píng)論。本文以《歷史人》為研究對(duì)象，運(yùn)用文學(xué)倫理批評(píng)方法，從人與自我、人與他人、人與社會(huì)三種關(guān)系的視角，探討《歷史人》中所體現(xiàn)的倫理道德觀，，進(jìn)而通過(guò)對(duì)該小說(shuō)的研究，形成對(duì)戰(zhàn)后英國(guó)校園學(xué)者倫理道德意識(shí)的考量。 本論文由五部分組成。 引言部分首先對(duì)布雷德伯里的生平、主要作品和《歷史人》進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要介紹，同時(shí)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外已有的相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行綜述；在梳理了聶珍釗教授等國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者所倡導(dǎo)的文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)及其當(dāng)前發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的基礎(chǔ)上，提出本研究的主要內(nèi)容。 論文的第一章對(duì)《歷史人》在人與自我這一層面的倫理思想進(jìn)行解讀。本章對(duì)小說(shuō)中的兩個(gè)主要人物——霍華德·科克與芭芭拉·科克夫婦兩人倫理道德觀的發(fā)展變化分別進(jìn)行了討論。通過(guò)分析兩人在沃特摩斯大學(xué)這個(gè)微型社會(huì)里崛起、斗爭(zhēng)和沉淪的自我發(fā)現(xiàn)和自我改變的過(guò)程，探討同一環(huán)境中兩個(gè)不同人物的行為變化和各自所表現(xiàn)出的道德倫理觀念。 第二章對(duì)《歷史人》在人與他人這一層面的倫理思想進(jìn)行解讀。通過(guò)分析霍華德·科克與妻子、學(xué)生、同事的關(guān)系，展現(xiàn)了二十世紀(jì)60年代英國(guó)社會(huì)中人與人之間冷淡、欺騙、利用和相互的傾軋的關(guān)系，進(jìn)一步揭示了當(dāng)時(shí)社會(huì)中人們極端自由的行為狀態(tài)和只顧追求個(gè)人享樂(lè)，缺少關(guān)愛(ài)、信任和理解的道德?tīng)顩r。 第三章對(duì)《歷史人》在人與社會(huì)這一層面的倫理思想進(jìn)行解讀。通過(guò)分析在沃特摩斯這個(gè)校園社會(huì)中遵守傳統(tǒng)的保守學(xué)生卡莫迪因不愿受制于以霍華德·科克教授為代表的激進(jìn)派而受到迫害，揭示出當(dāng)時(shí)英國(guó)社會(huì)中利己主義和實(shí)用主義對(duì)人們思想意識(shí)的集體腐蝕；其次，通過(guò)分析霍華德·科克的朋友兼同事亨利在現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的影響與壓迫下，最終背棄了自己一直遵循的傳統(tǒng)倫理道德，揭示出當(dāng)時(shí)英國(guó)社會(huì)的倫理道德已經(jīng)和傳統(tǒng)倫理道德徹底斷裂的狀況。 結(jié)論部分在總結(jié)全文研究?jī)?nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上指出，馬爾科姆·布雷德伯里在《歷史人》中揭示了在社會(huì)和歷史的變革時(shí)期人們倫理道德思想的混亂、迷茫與矛盾，反映了作者對(duì)所處歷史潮流中的倫理道德?tīng)顩r的思考與探索。本文的研究結(jié)果將有助于加深人們對(duì)于馬爾科姆·布雷德伯里作品中倫理道德的理解，彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有的相關(guān)研究中的某些不足之處，因而具有較為重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:British writer Malcolm Bradbury's iconic campus satire, Historical Man, 1975) has been a subject of critical attention since its publication. But at present, the study of this work is limited to the comments on its language and narrative style. This paper takes Historical Man as the object of study, applies the method of literary ethics criticism, from the person and self, between man and others. From the perspective of the relationship between man and society, this paper probes into the ethics and morality embodied in Historical Man, and then, through the study of the novel, forms the consideration of the postwar British campus scholars' ethical and moral consciousness. This paper consists of five parts. The preface first introduces Bradbury's life, his main works and the Historical Man, and summarizes the related studies at home and abroad. On the basis of combing the literary ethics criticism advocated by Professor Nie Zhenzhao and other domestic scholars, this paper puts forward the main contents of this study. The first chapter interprets the ethical thoughts of the Historical Man at the level of man and self. This chapter analyzes the ethics of the two main characters in the novel-Howard Kirk and Barbara Kirk. Development and change were discussed separately. By analyzing the rise of the two men in the tiny society of Watermoose University. In the process of self-discovery and self-change of struggle and depravity, the behavior changes of two different characters in the same environment and their moral and ethical concepts are discussed. The second chapter is an interpretation of the ethics of the Historical Man at the level of people and others. By analyzing Howard Kirk's relationship with his wife, his students, his colleagues. In 1960s, the relationship of indifference, deception, exploitation and mutual strife between people in English society was demonstrated. It further reveals the extremely free behavior state and the moral state of the pursuit of personal enjoyment, lack of care, trust and understanding in the society at that time. The third chapter interprets the ethical ideas of the Historical Man at the level of man and society. By analyzing the conservative student Carmody who adheres to the tradition in the campus society of Watermoose, he is unwilling to be held hostage to Howard Kirk. The professor was persecuted for representing the radicals. It reveals the collective corrosion of egoism and pragmatism to people's ideology in British society at that time. Second, by analyzing Howard Kirk's friend and colleague Henry, under the influence and oppression of real society, he finally turned his back on the traditional ethics he had been following. It reveals that the ethics and morality of the British society were completely broken with the traditional ethics at that time. The conclusion part points out that Malcolm Bradbury, in Historical Man, reveals the confusion, confusion and contradiction of people's ethical and moral thoughts in the period of social and historical change. It reflects the author's thinking and exploration of the ethical situation in his historical trend. The results of this paper will help to deepen the understanding of ethics in Malcolm Bradbury's works. So it has important theoretical and practical value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：I561.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 宋艷芳;;寄生、共生還是對(duì)抗?——文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與批評(píng)的關(guān)系轉(zhuǎn)變及當(dāng)代英國(guó)“學(xué)院小說(shuō)”[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2006年02期

2 王志林;;大學(xué)教師知識(shí)分子身份意識(shí)的理性透視[J];教師教育研究;2008年02期

3 管南異;你往何處去——評(píng)馬爾科姆·布拉德伯里的長(zhǎng)篇小說(shuō)《歷史人》[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2005年02期

4 傅曉燕;;高校題材小說(shuō)中學(xué)院知識(shí)分子的困境焦慮與精神堅(jiān)守[J];海南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

5 瞿世鏡;簡(jiǎn)論英國(guó)當(dāng)代校園小說(shuō)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1996年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李靜;戰(zhàn)后英國(guó)校園小說(shuō)中的人物模式[D];魯東大學(xué);2008年

2 張鳳麗;《歷史人》的敘事學(xué)解讀[D];河南大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1416963