風險放大的四級判定框架——基于SARF的理論拓展及典型案例的放大檢視
發(fā)布時間：2019-07-05 11:41
【摘要】：新媒體語境下,風險放大成為社會風險事件發(fā)展的新趨勢。國內(nèi)研究借鑒風險的社會放大框架(SARF)之時并未明確風險放大的判定標準。采用正向理論探索、逆向放大檢視兩種研究思路,本文綜合風險放大的理論框架的衍變及其在現(xiàn)實中的具體表現(xiàn),從感知、言論、行動及影響四個層面提出了"感知相悖-擴大化爭議-群體抗議-漣漪效應"這一風險放大的四級判定框架,并基于判定框架的具體判定標準明確了低層級、中層級、高層級三類風險放大的特征。
[Abstract]:In the context of new media, risk amplification becomes a new trend in the development of social risk events. The judgment standard for risk amplification is not clear when domestic research references the social amplification framework(SARF)of risk. In this paper, a four-level judgment framework of the risk amplification of``Perceptive Controversy Expansion of Disputed Groups'' is proposed from four aspects of perception, speech, action and influence, and the characteristics of low-level, middle and high-level risk amplification are defined based on the specific criteria of the judgment framework.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學新聞學院;
【基金】：重慶大學中央高�；究蒲许椖俊叭襟w時代科學傳播的轉(zhuǎn)向、路徑與問題研究”(2016CDJSK)階段性成果
【分類號】：G206
本文編號：2510494
[Abstract]:In the context of new media, risk amplification becomes a new trend in the development of social risk events. The judgment standard for risk amplification is not clear when domestic research references the social amplification framework(SARF)of risk. In this paper, a four-level judgment framework of the risk amplification of``Perceptive Controversy Expansion of Disputed Groups'' is proposed from four aspects of perception, speech, action and influence, and the characteristics of low-level, middle and high-level risk amplification are defined based on the specific criteria of the judgment framework.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學新聞學院;
【基金】：重慶大學中央高�；究蒲许椖俊叭襟w時代科學傳播的轉(zhuǎn)向、路徑與問題研究”(2016CDJSK)階段性成果
【分類號】：G206
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 趙旭東;;地方電視臺的競爭策略[J];青年記者;2013年14期
，本文編號：2510494
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/xinwenchuanbolunwen/2510494.html
