【摘要】：《桃花扇》是清初作家孔尚任歷經(jīng)10余載苦心創(chuàng)作而成的傳奇劇本,《春香傳》是朝鮮人民家喻戶(hù)曉的古典小說(shuō)�！短一ㄉ取泛汀洞合銈鳌肪郧嗄昴信異�(ài)情為主線(xiàn),分別描寫(xiě)了中朝兩國(guó)青年人的不同愛(ài)情故事。由于中朝兩國(guó)同屬于儒家文化圈,雖然兩部作品的結(jié)局不同,但其反封建的主題卻是相同的,因此二者具有一定的可比性。但是,由于《春香傳》在民間流傳的時(shí)間早于《桃花扇》,因此鮮有將兩部作品進(jìn)行比較研究者。本文認(rèn)為,產(chǎn)生較早的《春香傳》在初創(chuàng)時(shí)期曾受到過(guò)《西廂記》等中國(guó)文學(xué)的影響,在近半個(gè)世紀(jì)的流傳過(guò)程中,亦曾得到《牡丹亭》《長(zhǎng)生殿》《桃花扇》等創(chuàng)作的浸潤(rùn)與影響,正是在這層意義上,我們有理由將二者進(jìn)行比較研究。本論文共分為四章。第一章為為緒論,主要是研究目的及意義,研究的現(xiàn)狀及方法。第二章為《桃花扇》與《春香傳》的簡(jiǎn)介,主要包括兩部作品的創(chuàng)作過(guò)程和故事梗概。第三章為《桃花扇》與《春香傳》思想內(nèi)容上的異同。兩部作品的相同點(diǎn)主要包括：愛(ài)情故事發(fā)生的社會(huì)背景,追求愛(ài)情的過(guò)程與遭遇和男女主人公的身份與叛逆性格相同。不同點(diǎn)主要包括：一是創(chuàng)作意圖不同�！短一ㄉ取肥墙桦x合之情,寫(xiě)興亡之感,而《春香傳》則主要是以反對(duì)封建制度,追求婚姻平等為主題。二是故事結(jié)局不同�！短一ㄉ取肥潜瘎⌒越Y(jié)局,而《春香傳》則是喜劇性結(jié)局。三是人物形象不同。主要包括女主人公李香君與成春香的不同和男主人公侯方域與李夢(mèng)龍的不同。第四章為《桃花扇》與《春香傳》形式上的異同。兩部作品在形式上的相同點(diǎn)：一是才子佳人的敘事模式相同。二是故事情節(jié)的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)置相同。不同點(diǎn)包括：一是體裁不同。《桃花扇》為傳奇體裁,《春香傳》是漢文小說(shuō)體裁。二是創(chuàng)作手法不同�！短一ㄉ取烽L(zhǎng)于融情于景,善于側(cè)面描寫(xiě),而《春香傳》則長(zhǎng)于工筆敘事,善于引經(jīng)據(jù)典。三是語(yǔ)言特點(diǎn)不同�！短一ㄉ取吩~語(yǔ)古樸自然,唱詞韻律優(yōu)美,《春香傳》語(yǔ)言細(xì)膩文雅,句式駢散結(jié)合。將《桃花扇》和《春香傳》兩部作品進(jìn)行比較研究,不僅可以在比較中發(fā)現(xiàn)二者在諸多方面的同與不同,發(fā)現(xiàn)二者的文化基因與民族特點(diǎn),同時(shí)也可以擴(kuò)大比較文學(xué)的研究對(duì)象,豐富中韓比較文學(xué)的研究成果。這也正是本論文的價(jià)值所在。
[Abstract]:"Peach Blossom Fan" is a legendary play written by the writer Kong Shangren after more than 10 years of painstaking writing in the early Qing Dynasty. "Chun Xiang Zhuan" is a well-known classical novel of the Korean people. "Peach Blossom Fan" and "Chun Xiang Zhuan" are all based on the love of young men and women. It describes the different love stories of young people in China and Korea. Because the two countries belong to the Confucian cultural circle, although the outcome of the two works is different, but its anti-feudal theme is the same, so the two have a certain degree of comparability. However, due to the spread of Chun Xiang Biography earlier than Peach Blossom Fan, there are few researchers comparing the two works. This paper holds that the early "Chun Xiang Biography" was influenced by Chinese literature such as the "Western Chamber" in its initial period, and in the course of its spread in the past half century, It is in this sense that we have reason to make a comparative study on the infiltration and influence of the creation of Peony Pavilion and Peach Blossom Fan. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, mainly the research purpose and significance, the present situation and the method of the research. The second chapter is a brief introduction of Peach Blossom Fan and Chun Xiang Zhuan, mainly including the creation process and story outline of the two works. The third chapter is about the similarities and differences between Peach Blossom Fan and Chun Xiang Zhuan. The similarities of the two works mainly include: the social background of the occurrence of love story, the process and encounter of pursuing love and the identity and rebellious character of the protagonists and heroines. The main differences include: first, the creative intention is different. "Peach Blossom Fan" is to borrow the feeling of separation, write the sense of rise and fall, while "Chun Xiang Biography" is mainly to oppose the feudal system, the pursuit of equality in marriage as the theme. Second, the story ends differently. "Peach Blossom Fan" is a tragic ending, while "Chun Xiang Biography" is a tragic ending. Third, the character image is different. Mainly includes the heroine Li Xiangjun and Cheng Chunxiang's difference and the male protagonist Hou Fangyu and Li Menglong's difference. The fourth chapter is about the similarities and differences between Peach Blossom Fan and Chun Xiang Biography. The two works are similar in form: one is the same narrative mode of talented and beautiful people. Second, the structure of the story is the same. The differences include: first, different genres. "Peach Blossom Fan" is a legendary genre, "Chun Xiang Zhuan" is a genre of Chinese novels. Second, the creation technique is different. "Peach Blossom Fan" is good at the scene, good at side description, while "Chun Xiang Biography" is good at fine brushwork narration, is good at quoting the classics. Thirdly, the characteristics of language are different. "Peach Blossom Fan" words are simple and natural, the rhyme of singing words is beautiful, the language of "Chun Xiang Zhuan" is delicate and elegant, the sentence pattern is combined with parallel and scattered. Comparing the two works, Peach Blossom Fan and Chun Xiang Zhuan, we can not only find out the similarities and differences between them in many aspects, but also discover their cultural genes and national characteristics. At the same time, it can expand the research object of comparative literature and enrich the research results of Chinese and Korean comparative literature. This is the value of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I106-03

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪龍麟;清代《桃花扇》研究述評(píng)[J];克山師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

2 王琦珍;《桃花扇》研究的拓展與深入──讀施祖毓《桃花扇新視野》[J];撫州師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

3 仲冬梅;二十世紀(jì)前半葉的《桃花扇》研究[J];齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

4 鄧黛;;近十年來(lái)《桃花扇》研究綜述[J];戲曲研究;2002年02期

5 宋希芝;論《桃花扇》的悲劇審美[J];名作欣賞;2005年14期

6 王景鳳,宋希芝;談《桃花扇》的悲劇呈現(xiàn)[J];山東電大學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

7 江月;;《桃花扇》的悲劇蘊(yùn)涵[J];戲劇文學(xué);2006年03期

8 程大敏;;《桃花扇》中“之”字析——《桃花扇》中“得、的、之”探微之三[J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(雙月上半月);2008年03期

9 程大敏;;《桃花扇》中“的”字析——《桃花扇》中“得、的、之”探微之二[J];四川戲劇;2008年02期

10 張?zhí)煸?楊偉偉;;探析《桃花扇》的多重悲劇性[J];四川戲劇;2008年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 小瑞;新版《桃花扇》別樣風(fēng)景[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2009年

2 本報(bào)記者 劉淼;清唱版《桃花扇》展現(xiàn)素雅之美[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2010年

3 ;與第八版昆曲《桃花扇》曲作者的對(duì)話(huà)[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2009年

4 羅s，

本文編號(hào)：2227108