傳統(tǒng)研究認(rèn)為轉(zhuǎn)喻是一種修辭工具。近來認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)正從新的視角研究轉(zhuǎn)喻。學(xué)者們認(rèn)為轉(zhuǎn)喻是人類對(duì)世界概念化的基本手段并普通存在于我們的語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用及思維（Lakoff ＆ Johnson, 1980/2003: 3）。最重要的傳統(tǒng)轉(zhuǎn)喻理論包括:Lakoff （1987）的理想化認(rèn)知模式、Langacke（r1993）的參照點(diǎn)理論、Kovecses ＆ Radden（1999）的心理可及理論,它們?yōu)槠渌Z(yǔ)言學(xué)科的轉(zhuǎn)喻發(fā)展奠定了堅(jiān)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ),其中間接言語(yǔ)行為中的言外轉(zhuǎn)喻是新提出的高層轉(zhuǎn)喻。既然這樣,鄒春玲將轉(zhuǎn)喻發(fā)展分為三個(gè)階段:A代B,A是B,A知B（鄒春玲, 2010b: 36-40）。第一個(gè)階段用于傳統(tǒng)的修辭轉(zhuǎn)喻如以臉替代人;第二個(gè)階段是由徐盛桓（2009: 2-8）提出的模型用于解釋喻體為什么會(huì)出現(xiàn)在本體的位置上,反之亦然,如“布什攻擊伊拉克”;第三個(gè)階段用于推理如“萬(wàn)丈紅塵即是我的七尺之棺”,通過七尺之棺,我們可以知道萬(wàn)丈紅塵的含義,以此方式就創(chuàng)建了新的認(rèn)知方式（鄒春玲, 2010b: 36-40）。隨著轉(zhuǎn)喻的概念本質(zhì)被廣泛接受,轉(zhuǎn)喻識(shí)解在語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用中成為了不可避免和自然的認(rèn)知機(jī)制。近來出現(xiàn)了新... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：85 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Part 1 Introduction
    1.1 Lead-in Remarks
    1.2 Research Questions and Objectives
        1.2.1 Research questions
        1.2.2 Objectives
    1.3 Type of Research and Hypothesis
        1.3.1 The type of research
        1.3.2 Hypothesis
    1.4 Methodology
    1.5 Structure of the Dissertation
Part 2 Theoretical Framework and Related Literature
    2.1 Theoretical Framework
        2.1.1 The cog-pragmatic perspective
        2.1.2 Mental models-based attribute operation model
        2.1.3 Denotation & Connotation-based attribute inferential model
        2.1.4 Summary
    2.2 Related Literature
        2.2.1 A brief introduction of metonymy
        2.2.2 Metonymy as a cog-pragmatic phenomenon
        2.2.3 The main theories about metonymy
        2.2.4 Traditional approaches versus cognitive approaches
        2.2.5 The main characters and views in the study of metonymy
Part 3 Method
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Sources of Data
    3.3 Design and Procedure
        3.3.1 Design
        3.3.2 Procedure
Part 4 Results
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Denotation & Connotation Inheritance as the Guideline
    4.3 The Application of Denotation & Connotation in Metonymy
    4.4 The Analysis of Metonymy Construal in Cog-pragmatic perspective
        4.4.1 The construal of the narrow-view metonymy
        4.4.2 The construal of the referential metonymy
        4.4.3 The construal of the illocutionary metonymy
    4.5 Summary
Part 5 Discussion
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Significance of This Research
        5.2.1 Theoretical significance
        5.2.2 Practical significance
    5.3 Major Findings
    5.4 Limitations and Difficulties Encountered
Part 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Validity and Reliability
    6.3 Suggestions for Further Study
Bibliography
Published Paper
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3671470