稱謂在現(xiàn)如今的言語交流中是重要的組成部分,起著舉足輕重的地位,漢語稱謂系統(tǒng)是一個(gè)比較復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng),它的涵蓋面也十分廣,大體上包括姓名稱謂語,親屬稱謂語,職位稱謂以及社會(huì)稱謂語。而社會(huì)稱謂語按照使用的范圍又可分為通稱,專稱,以及零稱謂。本文主要針對(duì)在日常交際中使用的通用稱謂語為研究對(duì)象,選擇了兩個(gè)傳承的通稱:“師傅”和“同志”;二個(gè)新興的稱謂:“老師”,“老板”;三個(gè)重新啟用而來的稱謂:“大姐”,“先生”,“小姐”;還有二個(gè)泛化而來的稱謂:“美女”,“帥哥”。通稱的使用一方面是可以體現(xiàn)社會(huì)地位,另一方面也可以拉近人與人之間的距離。本文作者試圖用認(rèn)知語言學(xué)中的原型理論來分析語義裂變現(xiàn)象。現(xiàn)如今,認(rèn)知語言學(xué)已成為一個(gè)流行的趨勢(shì),它是語言的一個(gè)新主題。原型理論是認(rèn)知語言學(xué)中的基本理論,所以用原型理論來闡釋這個(gè)現(xiàn)象能使其上升到演變機(jī)制的高度,從而使本文更具理論性和科學(xué)性。根據(jù)如上考慮,本文主要有以下三個(gè)研究問題:1,什么是語義裂變現(xiàn)象及產(chǎn)生語義裂變現(xiàn)象的原因?2,在語義裂變過程中,每一個(gè)通稱的基本意義有變化嗎?如果有,它們是怎么變化的? 3,當(dāng)通稱發(fā)生語義裂變時(shí)的過程是什么?為了使以上問題更加清晰... 

【文章來源】：東北師范大學(xué)吉林省211工程院校教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：56 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Significance of the Study
    1.2 Reasons for the Study
    1.3 Organization of the Study
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Prototype Theory
        2.1.1 Classical View of Category
        2.1.2 Defining Prototypes
        2.1.3 Characteristics of Prototypicality
    2.2 Studies on Semantic Fission
        2.2.1 Definition of Semantic Fission
        2.2.2 Steps of Semantic Fission
    2.3 Studies on Chinese Widely-used Address Forms
        2.3.1 Definition of “Widely-used”
        2.3.2 Characteristics of Chinese Widely-used Adress Forms
        2.3.3 Factors that are involved in the Selection of Widely-used Address Forms .
    2.4 Studies on Semantic Fission of Chinese Widely-used Address Forms
Chapter Three Research Design
    3.1 Research Object
    3.2 Research Questions
    3.3 Research Participants
    3.4 Research Methods
    3.5 Data Collection
    3.6 Research Procedure
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results of Question One
        4.1.1 the First Result
        4.1.2 the Second Result
    4.2 Results and Discussion of Questionnaire
        4.2.1 Results of Questionnaire
        4.2.2 Discussion
    4.3 Results of Question Three
        4.3.1 “Tongzhi”
        4.3.2 “Shifu”
        4.3.3 “Laoshi”
        4.3.4 “Laoban”
        4.3.5 “Xiaojie”
        4.3.6 “Xiansheng”
        4.3.7 “Meinv”and “Shuaige”
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implication
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
        5.3.1 Limitations of Prototype Theory
        5.3.2 Limitations of Widely-used Address Forms
        5.3.3 Future Studies
References
AppendixⅠ
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3632492