反語(yǔ)是日常交流中普遍使用的語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象。由于其獨(dú)特性和普遍性,受到了眾多學(xué)者的關(guān)注。一開(kāi)始,研究者們從修辭角度研究反語(yǔ),后來(lái)逐漸擴(kuò)展到心理學(xué)和語(yǔ)言學(xué)特別是認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)領(lǐng)域�，F(xiàn)代語(yǔ)言學(xué)的各個(gè)分支從多角度全方位地審視該語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象,探討反語(yǔ)的概念及生成、理解機(jī)制。然而由于上述研究的缺陷及反語(yǔ)的復(fù)雜性,它們都無(wú)法全面解釋反語(yǔ)實(shí)時(shí)意義建構(gòu)過(guò)程。概念整合理論的核心概念是概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)。概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)的基本模型包括四個(gè)心理空間：兩個(gè)輸入空間,類屬空間和合成空間。本研究采取了定性分析方法。在對(duì)搜集到的語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行篩選和分類之后,建立不同類型的概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò),兩個(gè)輸入空間內(nèi)的部分元素形成跨空間映射,并且選擇性投射到合成空間中,使得合成空間具有輸入空間中不具備的新元素。在合成空間的完善過(guò)程中,借助于背景框架可以得出輸入空間之間的矛盾。在對(duì)合成空間進(jìn)行運(yùn)演的過(guò)程中,輸入空間的投射元素重新建構(gòu),最終演繹出反語(yǔ)意義。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)鏡像網(wǎng)絡(luò)、單域網(wǎng)絡(luò)和雙域網(wǎng)絡(luò)對(duì)反語(yǔ)實(shí)時(shí)意義建構(gòu)過(guò)程具有強(qiáng)大的闡釋力。將該理論應(yīng)用于反語(yǔ)分析,為反語(yǔ)研究提供了一種新的視角。此外,將該理論應(yīng)用于自然語(yǔ)言話語(yǔ)分析可以從總體上檢驗(yàn)其闡釋力,發(fā)現(xiàn)其優(yōu)點(diǎn)和不足,強(qiáng)化... 

【文章來(lái)源】：南京師范大學(xué)江蘇省 211工程院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：53 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Origin and Development of the Research into Irony
    1.2 Classification of Irony
        1.2.1 Verbal Irony
        1.2.2 Situational Irony
        1.2.3 Structural Irony
    1.3 Motivation of the Research
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Rhetorical Approaches to Irony
    2.3 Semantic Approaches to Irony
    2.4 Pragmatic Approaches to Irony
        2.4.1 Grice's Violation-Based View
        2.4.2 Leech's Politeness Principle
    2.5 Cognitive Approaches to Irony
        2.5.1 Attardo's Relevant Inappropriateness
        2.5.2 Sperber & Wilson's Echoic Mention Theory
        2.5.3 Clark & Gerrig's Pretense Theory
        2.5.4 Utsumi's Implicit Display Theory
    2.6 Limitations of the Previous Studies
    2.7 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundations
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 The Development of Conceptual Integration Theory
    3.3 The Network Model of Conceptual Integration
    3.4 Optimality Principles of Conceptual Integration Network
        3.4.1 Integration
        3.4.2 Topology
        3.4.3 Web
        3.4.4 Unpacking
        3.4.5 Good reason
    3.5 Types of Conceptual Integration Network
        3.5.1 Simplex Network
        3.5.2 Mirror Network
        3.5.3 Single-Scope Network
        3.5.4 Double-Scope Network
    3.6 Summary
Chapter Four Irony Analyses Based on Conceptual Integration Theory
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Requisite Factors in Irony Comprehension
        4.2.1 Essential Abilities of the Hearer
            4.2.1.1 Language Ability
            4.2.1.2 Memory
            4.2.1.3 Associative Thinking
            4.2.1.4 Inferring Ability
        4.2.2 Shared Background Knowledge
        4.2.3 Context
    4.3 Meaning Construction in Cognitive Linguistics
    4.4 Meaning Construction of Irony in CIN
        4.4.1 Irony in Mirror Network
        4.4.2 Irony in Single-Scope Network
        4.4.3 Irony in Double-Scope Network
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Major Findings of the Research
    5.2 Limitations of the Research and Further Study
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
在讀期間發(fā)表的學(xué)術(shù)論文及研究成果


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION[J]. Gilles Fauconnier.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2003(02)

碩士論文
[1]Fauconnier的概念整合理論及其在二語(yǔ)教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[D]. 沈莉.南京師范大學(xué) 2004



本文編號(hào)：3062897