【摘要】：隨著國(guó)家“四個(gè)全面”戰(zhàn)略布局的深入開(kāi)展,依法治國(guó)也受到越來(lái)越多的重視。在這樣的大背景下,推進(jìn)法律語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范化顯得尤為重要。而法律術(shù)語(yǔ)作為法律語(yǔ)言的核心,其規(guī)范化工作的重要性和緊迫性不言而喻。異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的規(guī)范化是法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范工作的重要內(nèi)容,本文將針對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)存在的一些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行規(guī)范化研究,并在“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”理論方法的基礎(chǔ)之上,創(chuàng)造性地提出了一種解決異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化問(wèn)題的新思路、新方法,希望能夠?qū)愋畏尚g(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化工作落到實(shí)處,同時(shí)為推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)盡一份綿薄之力。論文共分為七個(gè)部分,各部分具體內(nèi)容如下:首先是緒論部分。主要包括研究對(duì)象、研究背景、研究綜述、研究目的和意義、研究選材、研究思路和研究方法。第一章是“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”理論的介紹。提出了異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的四個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)群,分別是認(rèn)知價(jià)群、語(yǔ)義價(jià)群、語(yǔ)用價(jià)群和功能價(jià)群。其中,認(rèn)知價(jià)群又包括普通認(rèn)知價(jià)、專家認(rèn)知價(jià)、語(yǔ)形價(jià)、易識(shí)價(jià)、模因結(jié)構(gòu)價(jià)五個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià);語(yǔ)義價(jià)群又包括理?yè)?jù)價(jià)、語(yǔ)義透明價(jià)和反義系統(tǒng)價(jià)三個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià);語(yǔ)用價(jià)群又包括頻率價(jià)、分布價(jià)、地域價(jià)、語(yǔ)體價(jià)和時(shí)代價(jià)五個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià);功能價(jià)群又包括反映價(jià)、突顯價(jià)和釋義元語(yǔ)言價(jià)三個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)。第二章是異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的共性研究。我們從共性的角度出發(fā),基于“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”的理論對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)進(jìn)行了表層和深層特征分析與規(guī)范。首先是表層形式特征的分析,通過(guò)對(duì)1000組異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的分析,我們將其分成了成分逆序、同音近音現(xiàn)象、縮略、分段相同、個(gè)別字相同、用字完全不同和綜合方式七種情況;然后是深層特征分析,結(jié)合異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的一些特殊情況,我們先后基于“�？普Z(yǔ)義三角”“模因論”和“語(yǔ)義三環(huán)”探討了異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的命名、模因結(jié)構(gòu)和語(yǔ)義透明度等方面的差異情況;最后在“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”理論的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合具體的實(shí)例對(duì)一般的異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)進(jìn)行了規(guī)范化的操作演示。第三章是異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的個(gè)類(lèi)研究。針對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)中翻譯異形差異的情況對(duì)其進(jìn)行了分析與規(guī)范。首先從正誤譯差、共存譯差和地域譯差等三個(gè)方面對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的譯差進(jìn)行了分析,然后又結(jié)合“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”分別從正誤譯差、共存譯差和地域譯差等三個(gè)方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行了譯名統(tǒng)一與規(guī)范化的操作。第四章也是異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的個(gè)類(lèi)研究。首先對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)中存在的新舊差進(jìn)行了分析,并在“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”理論的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合具體實(shí)例對(duì)其進(jìn)行了規(guī)范化操作演示;然后又對(duì)正俗差的情況進(jìn)行了分析,同樣結(jié)合“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”理論對(duì)其進(jìn)行了規(guī)范化操作。最后根據(jù)得出的結(jié)果檢驗(yàn)?zāi)承┊愋畏尚g(shù)語(yǔ)的新稱和正稱是否一定比對(duì)應(yīng)的舊稱和俗稱更適合作為主形。第五章是對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化相關(guān)工作提出的一些建議。首先是異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化的流程,我們認(rèn)為,異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化工作應(yīng)該遵循以下幾個(gè)流程:1.術(shù)語(yǔ)搜集;2.分類(lèi)整理、描寫(xiě)分析;3.確立主形、進(jìn)行規(guī)范;4.征詢各界意見(jiàn)、形成規(guī)范文件;5.構(gòu)建術(shù)語(yǔ)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù);6.動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)與更新術(shù)語(yǔ)庫(kù)。其次是異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化的原則,我們認(rèn)為異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)規(guī)范化至少應(yīng)遵循以下幾個(gè)原則:俗成性原則、理?yè)?jù)性原則、系統(tǒng)性原則和簡(jiǎn)明性原則。最后我們對(duì)異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)分類(lèi)規(guī)范問(wèn)題以及異形法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的規(guī)范化研究對(duì)法律新術(shù)語(yǔ)定名的指導(dǎo)問(wèn)題談了一些看法。最后是結(jié)語(yǔ)部分。首先是對(duì)本文的研究進(jìn)行了總結(jié),然后指出了本文研究存在的一些不足之處,最后談了本文研究未來(lái)的可拓展空間。
[Abstract]:With the development of the "four comprehensive" strategic layout of the country, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law. Under such a background, it is particularly important to promote the standardization of legal language. Normalization is an important part of legal terminology standardization work. This paper will study some problems existing in abnormal legal terminology standardization, and creatively put forward a new way to solve the problem of abnormal legal terminology standardization based on the theory and method of "terminology price", hoping to regulate abnormal legal terminology. The thesis is divided into seven parts, each part of the specific content is as follows: First, the introduction part. It mainly includes the research object, research background, research summary, research purpose and significance, research materials, research ideas and research methods. The first chapter is the theory of term price. Four term price groups of abnormal legal terms are put forward, which are cognitive price group, semantic price group, pragmatic price group and functional price group. Three term valences; pragmatic valence group includes five term valences: frequency valence, distributive valence, regional valence, stylistic valence and temporal valence; functional valence group includes three term valences: reflective valence, salient valence and metalinguistic valence. The first is the analysis of the surface and deep features of legal terminology. Through the analysis of 1000 groups of abnormal legal terminology, we divide them into seven types: inverse order of components, homonym, abbreviation, segmental similarity, single character similarity, completely different use of words and comprehensive methods. According to the special circumstances of the abnormal legal terms, we have discussed the differences in the naming, memetic structure and semantic transparency of the abnormal legal terms based on the "specialized semantic triangle", "memetics" and "semantic triangle". Finally, we have discussed the general differences based on the "term price" theory and specific examples. Chapter three is the category study of the abnormal legal terminology. It analyzes and standardizes the abnormal differences in the translation of the abnormal legal terminology. Firstly, it analyzes the translation errors of the abnormal legal terminology from three aspects: correctness and error, coexistence of translation errors and regional translation errors. Combining with the term price, this paper unifies and standardizes the translated names from three aspects: correctness and error, coexistence and regional difference. Chapter 4 is also a specific study of the abnormal legal terms. The example demonstrates its standardized operation, and then analyzes the situation of correctness and vulgarity, and carries out the standardized operation with the theory of "term price". Finally, according to the results obtained, it tests whether the new and proper terms of some abnormal legal terms are more suitable for the main form than the corresponding old ones. First of all, we think that the standardization of legal terminology of special-shaped law should follow the following procedures: 1. terminology collection; 2. classification, description and analysis; 3. establish the main form, standardization; 4. solicit opinions from all walks of life, form a normative text. 5. Constructing terminology database; 6. Maintaining and updating terminology database dynamically. Secondly, the principle of standardization of abnormal legal terminology. We believe that the standardization of abnormal legal terminology should follow at least the following principles: the principle of vulgarity, the principle of motivation, the principle of systematicness and the principle of conciseness. The last part is the conclusion. Firstly, it summarizes the research of this paper, then points out some shortcomings of this study, and finally discusses the future of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王磊;王東海;;中國(guó)內(nèi)地和香港法律術(shù)語(yǔ)的譯差及其規(guī)范化[J];中國(guó)科技術(shù)語(yǔ);2016年04期

2 亢世勇;;大陸臺(tái)灣同義異形詞語(yǔ)造詞理?yè)?jù)分析[J];中國(guó)科技術(shù)語(yǔ);2015年05期

3 王東海;;法律術(shù)語(yǔ)“術(shù)語(yǔ)價(jià)”研究[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

4 姜?jiǎng)υ?關(guān)于法律領(lǐng)域詞語(yǔ)選用的規(guī)范性[J];平頂山師專學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

5 長(zhǎng)召其,張志毅;異形詞的規(guī)范[J];語(yǔ)文建設(shè);1998年04期

6 周薦;;異名同實(shí)詞語(yǔ)研究[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1997年04期

7 馮志偉;計(jì)算語(yǔ)言學(xué)對(duì)理論語(yǔ)言學(xué)的挑戰(zhàn)[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;1992年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2200515