【摘要】：契丹是興起于中國(guó)北方的古代游牧民族。10世紀(jì)初在耶律阿保機(jī)的帶領(lǐng)下建立了強(qiáng)大的遼王朝,并統(tǒng)治北方廣闊疆域長(zhǎng)達(dá)200多年(907-1125)之久。據(jù)有關(guān)記載,耶律阿保機(jī)在突呂不和魯不古的幫助下創(chuàng)制契丹大字(920年)和由迭剌創(chuàng)制契丹小字(略晚于大字)一并通行于遼朝境內(nèi)。遼朝衰亡后契丹文被金朝沿用,直至金章宗明昌二年(1191年)。之后,契丹文漸漸被人們遺忘,最終成為無(wú)人能識(shí)的死文字。時(shí)過(guò)幾百年,到了 1922年比利時(shí)神父凱爾溫(L.Kervyn)從今內(nèi)蒙古巴林右旗遼慶陵發(fā)現(xiàn)契丹文遼帝后哀冊(cè),得到國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)界的廣泛關(guān)注,并掀起一股契丹文研究熱潮。通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外幾代學(xué)者的共同努力和研究資料的不斷涌現(xiàn),契丹文研究水平也日益得到提升。隨著釋讀工作和研究水平的進(jìn)步和提高,契丹文釋讀成果碩果累累。而對(duì)前人研究進(jìn)行梳理會(huì)對(duì)過(guò)去研究成果有一定檢驗(yàn)作用。本文對(duì)過(guò)去契丹小字研究進(jìn)行概括的同時(shí)在前人研究基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)已釋契丹小字進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理,并整理出契丹語(yǔ)與蒙古語(yǔ)的共同詞匯,試圖闡明二者間的語(yǔ)音對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系。本篇論文由緒論、正文和附錄三部分組成,緒論部分主要交代了選題依據(jù)、研究意義、目標(biāo)和內(nèi)容等情況;正文部分共三章,第一章介紹了契丹語(yǔ)與蒙古語(yǔ)共同詞匯研究概況,第二章中對(duì)契丹語(yǔ)與蒙古語(yǔ)名詞共同詞匯進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,第三章為契丹語(yǔ)與蒙古語(yǔ)其他詞類共同詞匯進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,最后為結(jié)論,參考文獻(xiàn)和契丹小字文獻(xiàn)全稱及簡(jiǎn)稱組成。通過(guò)此次研究發(fā)現(xiàn)契丹語(yǔ)的一些語(yǔ)音語(yǔ)法規(guī)律,如契丹語(yǔ)與蒙古語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)音對(duì)應(yīng)規(guī)律、契丹語(yǔ)有輔音消失現(xiàn)象等。還認(rèn)為契丹語(yǔ)屬阿爾泰語(yǔ)系蒙古語(yǔ)族語(yǔ)言。
[Abstract]:Qidan is an ancient nomadic people rising in northern China. At the beginning of the 10th century, under the leadership of Yeru Arbor, he established a powerful Liao Dynasty, and ruled the vast territory of the North for more than 200 years (907-1125). According to relevant records, Yeru Arbor, with the help of Tulubu and Lu Bugu, created the Qidan characters (920) and the small characters of Qidan (slightly later than the large characters) which were created by the United States of America and used in the Liao Dynasty. After the fall of the Liao Dynasty, Qidan text was used by the Jin Dynasty, until the second year of Ming Chang of Jin Zhangzong (1191). After that, Qidan text was gradually forgotten and eventually became a dead text that no one could recognize. Hundreds of years later, in 1922, L. Kervyn, a Belgian priest, found the Liao Emperor in Liao Qing Mausoleum of Balin, Inner Mongolia, which received extensive attention from scholars at home and abroad, and set off an upsurge in the study of Qidan. Through the joint efforts of several generations of scholars at home and abroad and the continuous emergence of research materials, the research level of Qidan text has been improved day by day. With the progress and improvement of interpretation and research, Qidan's interpretation is fruitful. However, the past research results will be tested by combing the previous studies. On the basis of previous studies, this paper summarizes the past studies of Qidan small Chinese characters, systematically combs the interpreted Qidan small Chinese characters, and collates the common vocabulary of Qidan and Mongolian languages, and tries to clarify the phonetic correspondence between them. This thesis is composed of three parts: introduction, text and appendix. The introduction mainly explains the basis, significance, goal and content of the selected topic. The first chapter introduces the general situation of common vocabulary research in Qidan and Mongolian. The second chapter makes a comparative study on the common vocabulary of Qidan and Mongolian nouns. The third chapter makes a comparative study on the common vocabulary of Qidan and other parts of speech in Mongolian. Through this study, we found some phonetic grammatical rules of Qidan language, such as the phonetic correspondence between Qidan language and Mongolian language, the disappearance of consonant in Qidan language, and so on. The Khitan language is considered to be an Altaic Mongolian language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H212;H211.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳英U，

本文編號(hào)：2128602