本文選題：關(guān)聯(lián)理論 + 事實(shí)性假設(shè)�。� 參考：《四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：Sperber和Wilson的關(guān)聯(lián)理論問(wèn)世后,在語(yǔ)言學(xué)界引起巨大爭(zhēng)議,以往對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)理論的批判基本都是從宏觀角度進(jìn)行的,從微觀上探討關(guān)聯(lián)理論的文章卻很少。事實(shí)性假設(shè)是構(gòu)成關(guān)聯(lián)理論中認(rèn)知環(huán)境的基本要素,語(yǔ)言學(xué)界除了Sperber和Wilson自己,其他人對(duì)此甚少提及。對(duì)于事實(shí)性假設(shè)這一概念,Sperber和Wilson(2001,pp.76-79)提出了兩種觀點(diǎn):功能觀和邏輯觀,并且贊同功能觀,認(rèn)為事實(shí)性假設(shè)僅由事件狀態(tài)表征構(gòu)成,人們對(duì)事實(shí)性假設(shè)的相信程度不是一個(gè)可量化的值。Sperber和Wilson在關(guān)聯(lián)理論中將事實(shí)性假設(shè)的邏輯觀與功能觀進(jìn)行對(duì)比論證,進(jìn)而得出功能觀優(yōu)于邏輯觀的結(jié)論;而本文的看法正好相反。本文首先指出Sperber和Wilson論據(jù)中存在的問(wèn)題,然后具體論證了邏輯觀的合理性、可行性及必要性,闡釋了邏輯觀的優(yōu)點(diǎn)。由于事實(shí)性假設(shè)是關(guān)聯(lián)理論的一個(gè)基本概念,支持事實(shí)性假設(shè)的邏輯觀會(huì)直接影響到關(guān)聯(lián)理論其他相關(guān)概念,因而本文進(jìn)一步從事實(shí)性假設(shè)的邏輯觀探討了關(guān)聯(lián)理論的其他相關(guān)概念。本文主要從以下三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行探討:1.事實(shí)性假設(shè)邏輯觀的合理性;2.事實(shí)性假設(shè)邏輯觀的優(yōu)勢(shì);3.事實(shí)性假設(shè)邏輯觀對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)理論的修正及發(fā)展。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)Sperber和Wilson對(duì)邏輯觀的質(zhì)疑并不成立,與功能觀相比,邏輯觀更合理,對(duì)事實(shí)性假設(shè)的闡釋更全面更具體;從事實(shí)性假設(shè)邏輯觀的角度對(duì)其他相關(guān)概念如認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境、語(yǔ)境效果、推理等進(jìn)行了相應(yīng)的修正及發(fā)展,修正后的觀點(diǎn)能夠更好、更全面地闡釋語(yǔ)言理解過(guò)程中涉及到的認(rèn)知加工過(guò)程。
[Abstract]:After Sperber and Wilson's relevance theory came out, it caused great controversy in the field of linguistics. In the past, the criticism of relevance theory was basically carried out from a macro perspective, but there were few articles discussing relevance theory from the microscopic point of view. Factual hypothesis is the basic element of cognitive environment in relevance theory, which is seldom mentioned in linguists except Sperber and Wilson themselves. For the concept of factual hypothesis, Sperber and Wilsonian 2001pp.76-79, two viewpoints are put forward: functional view and logical view, and agree with functional view that factual hypothesis is only composed of event state representation. The degree of belief in factual hypothesis is not a quantifiable value. Sperber and Wilson compare the logic view and functional view of factual hypothesis in relevance theory, and then draw the conclusion that functional view is superior to logical view. The view of this article is just the opposite. This paper first points out the problems existing in the arguments of Sperber and Wilson, then proves the rationality, feasibility and necessity of the logic view, and explains the advantages of the logic view. Since factual hypothesis is a basic concept of relevance theory, the logical view supporting factual hypothesis will directly affect other related concepts of relevance theory. Therefore, this paper further discusses other relevant concepts of relevance theory from the logic view of factual hypothesis. This article mainly carries on the discussion from the following three aspects: 1. The rationality of the logic view of factual hypothesis. The advantage of the logic view of factual hypothesis is 3. The modification and development of relevance theory from the logic view of factual hypothesis. It is found that Sperber and Wilson doubt the logic view, and the logic view is more reasonable than the functional view, and the explanation of the factual hypothesis is more comprehensive and specific, and the other related concepts such as cognitive context are analyzed from the perspective of the logic view of the factual hypothesis. Contextual effects and reasoning have been revised and developed accordingly. The modified view can better and more comprehensively explain the cognitive process involved in the process of language understanding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前8條

1 吳剛 王興楊;重慶出臺(tái)食品安全連帶追究辦法[N];中國(guó)食品安全報(bào);2012年

2 記者 何軍;嚴(yán)曉群現(xiàn)金還債上海科技或脫困[N];上海證券報(bào);2005年

3 本報(bào)記者　　陳健健;上�？萍�3.82億占資解決方案出爐[N];中國(guó)證券報(bào);2005年

4 記者 黃群;證監(jiān)局檢查發(fā)現(xiàn)若干問(wèn)題 普洛股份被責(zé)令整改[N];上海證券報(bào);2011年

5 李tD;對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)操作利潤(rùn)的思考[N];中國(guó)審計(jì)報(bào);2001年

6 李超;如何對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)讓定價(jià)進(jìn)行調(diào)整[N];中國(guó)稅務(wù)報(bào);2002年

7 ;青鳥(niǎo)華光 對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)好大方[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

8 ;ST吉化25日恢復(fù)上市[N];中國(guó)證券報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐春勇;大五個(gè)性和工作態(tài)度對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)績(jī)效影響的實(shí)證研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 尹歡;從事實(shí)假設(shè)邏輯觀的角度對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)理論的嘗試性探索[D];四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2017年

2 曹向陽(yáng);原子核中處理對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)方法的研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2014年

3 張璐;上市公司股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)交易規(guī)模的影響研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1775358