本文關(guān)鍵詞： 處士 隱士 橫議 善言 知言　出處：《史學(xué)月刊》2017年09期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：批判"處士橫議"是孟子人生中的大舉措,然而當(dāng)代學(xué)者對(duì)處士身份的認(rèn)識(shí)并不統(tǒng)一,有學(xué)者將處士釋為"有才德而隱居不仕之人"。這一解釋不僅違背戰(zhàn)國(guó)史實(shí),也消解了孟子批判"處士橫議"的合理性。孟子以"善言"為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以立言行仁為主旨,以"知言"為前提,評(píng)判戰(zhàn)國(guó)處士言說(shuō),斷以"橫議",折射出其注重道德功用的語(yǔ)言倫理,既要求言說(shuō)者的言語(yǔ)行為要擔(dān)負(fù)一定的社會(huì)道義責(zé)任,接受公眾道德規(guī)范的制約,也強(qiáng)調(diào)接受主體的話語(yǔ)理解須有道義責(zé)任的約束。
[Abstract]:It is a great move in Mencius' life to criticize "the discussion of a scholar". However, contemporary scholars do not have a unified understanding of the status of a scholar. Some scholars interpret a scholar as "a person who has talent and virtue and is not reclusive." this explanation is not only against the historical facts of the warring States period, but also against the historical facts of the warring States period. Mencius also dispelled the rationality of Mencius' criticism of "the unruly discussion of Virtue". Mencius took "good words" as the standard, took words and deeds as the main purpose, and "know the words" as the premise to judge the speech of the scholars in the warring States period. The conclusion of "horizontal discussion" reflects the linguistic ethics which emphasizes the moral function, which requires the speech act of the speaker to bear a certain social moral responsibility and accept the restriction of the public moral standard. It also emphasizes that the discourse understanding of the subject must be bound by moral obligation.
【作者單位】： 陜西師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)孟學(xué)史研究”(11AZD051)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B222.5;H0-05
，

本文編號(hào)：1506637