法律語(yǔ)體中的能愿動(dòng)詞研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-10 18:00
【摘要】：本文運(yùn)用了語(yǔ)義學(xué)和型式語(yǔ)法的相關(guān)理論討論了法律語(yǔ)體中的能愿動(dòng)詞的分布情況,考察了法律語(yǔ)體和小說(shuō)語(yǔ)體中的能愿動(dòng)詞使用的差異,重點(diǎn)討論了法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體中能愿動(dòng)詞的兩類常用結(jié)構(gòu)：“Vcw+長(zhǎng)介詞結(jié)構(gòu)+VP”與“Neg+Vcw+VP+的”,使用型式語(yǔ)法理論分析了法律語(yǔ)體中能愿動(dòng)詞常使用這兩類結(jié)構(gòu)的原因,希望以此來(lái)對(duì)法律語(yǔ)體的能愿動(dòng)詞使用情況進(jìn)行較全面的分析。本文共分為六章： 第一章為本文研究做鋪墊,其中包括與本題目相關(guān)的研究情況、選題的目的和意義、界定研究對(duì)象以及研究的語(yǔ)料來(lái)源和研究方法。 第二章首先對(duì)本文研究的能愿動(dòng)詞的定義和范圍進(jìn)行界定,討論了能愿動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)法功能,在此基礎(chǔ)上統(tǒng)計(jì)了能愿動(dòng)詞在法律語(yǔ)體中的分布情況,然后從能愿動(dòng)詞情態(tài)語(yǔ)義和法律語(yǔ)體本身特點(diǎn)的角度著重分析了兩個(gè)主要差異產(chǎn)生的原因：一個(gè)是“應(yīng)當(dāng)”和“可以”兩個(gè)能愿動(dòng)詞在法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體中高頻出現(xiàn)的原因；另一個(gè)則是造成法庭口語(yǔ)中不同角色使用不同能愿動(dòng)詞的原因。 第三章對(duì)法律語(yǔ)體中的能愿動(dòng)詞的主要功能進(jìn)行了討論,在法律語(yǔ)體中能愿動(dòng)詞功能主要有三：第一,能愿動(dòng)詞可以賦予權(quán)力(權(quán)利),第二,能愿動(dòng)詞設(shè)定義務(wù)；第三,能愿動(dòng)詞表達(dá)話語(yǔ)立場(chǎng)。 第四章首先把法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體與另一種典型的書(shū)面語(yǔ)體(小說(shuō)語(yǔ)體)中的能愿動(dòng)詞分布情況進(jìn)行了對(duì)比：法律語(yǔ)體中能愿動(dòng)詞種類較小說(shuō)語(yǔ)體少且分布呈不均衡狀態(tài)；其次,兩種語(yǔ)體中的高頻能愿動(dòng)詞和與能愿動(dòng)詞經(jīng)常共現(xiàn)的句式也存在很大差異：法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體中的句式中包含多個(gè)介詞結(jié)構(gòu),并且能愿動(dòng)詞的否定形式遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)多于小說(shuō)語(yǔ)體。最后從語(yǔ)體功能的角度分析了造成兩種語(yǔ)體中能愿動(dòng)詞的種種差異的原因。 第五章著重分析法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體中的兩種常見(jiàn)句式：“Vcw+長(zhǎng)介詞結(jié)構(gòu)+VP”和"Neg+Vcw+VP+的”,并分別根據(jù)介詞結(jié)構(gòu)和后接動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)義關(guān)系與語(yǔ)法角色把兩類結(jié)構(gòu)分類。最后利用型式語(yǔ)法的相關(guān)理論對(duì)兩類結(jié)構(gòu)高頻出現(xiàn)的原因進(jìn)行分析,兩種結(jié)構(gòu)在法律書(shū)面語(yǔ)體高頻出現(xiàn)是因?yàn)槟茉竸?dòng)詞和結(jié)構(gòu)之間存在“互選”關(guān)系。 第六章為結(jié)語(yǔ),總結(jié)全文內(nèi)容并指出本研究尚存在的一些不足之處。
[Abstract]:Based on the theories of semantics and type grammar, this paper discusses the distribution of willing verbs in legal style, and investigates the differences between legal style and novel style in the use of wishing verbs. In this paper, the author mainly discusses two types of structures of willing verbs in legal written style: "Vcw long preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's". By using the theory of pattern grammar, this paper analyzes the reasons why the two types of structures are often used in legal style. We hope to make a comprehensive analysis of the usage of the willing verbs in legal style. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter lays the groundwork for this study, including the research related to this topic, the purpose and significance of the topic, the definition of the research object, the source of the research materials and research methods. The second chapter first defines the definition and scope of the wishful verbs studied in this paper, discusses the grammatical functions of the wishing verbs, and then statistics the distribution of the willing verbs in the legal style on the basis of this. Then from the perspective of modal semantics and legal stylistic characteristics of the willing verbs, this paper analyzes the reasons for the two main differences: one is the reason why "ought" and "can" appear frequently in the legal written style; The other is the reason why different characters use different wishful verbs in the spoken language of the court. The third chapter discusses the main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style. There are three main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style: first, the wishing verbs can give power (rights), the second is to set the obligation of the wishing verbs; Third, willing verbs to express the position of discourse. The fourth chapter first compares the distribution of willing verbs in legal style with that in another typical written style (novel style): in legal style, there are fewer types and uneven distribution of wishing verbs than those in novel style, and the distribution of possible verbs in legal style is less than that in the novel style, and the distribution of the verbs in the legal style is less than that in the novel style. Secondly, there is a great difference between the high-frequency willing verbs and the sentence patterns that often co-occur between the two styles: the sentence patterns in the legal written style contain multiple prepositions, and the negative forms of the willing verbs are much more than those in the novel style. Finally, from the perspective of stylistic function, this paper analyzes the causes of the differences between the possible verbs in the two styles. The fifth chapter focuses on the analysis of two common sentence patterns in legal written style: "Vcw long-term preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's", and classifies the two types of structures according to the semantic relationship and grammatical role of preposition structure and subsequent verbs respectively. Finally, the causes of the high frequency of the two types of structures are analyzed by using the theory of pattern grammar. The reason why the two structures appear in the high frequency of the legal written style is due to the "interselection" relationship between the willing verbs and the structure. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the full text content and points out some shortcomings of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146
本文編號(hào)：2437853
[Abstract]:Based on the theories of semantics and type grammar, this paper discusses the distribution of willing verbs in legal style, and investigates the differences between legal style and novel style in the use of wishing verbs. In this paper, the author mainly discusses two types of structures of willing verbs in legal written style: "Vcw long preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's". By using the theory of pattern grammar, this paper analyzes the reasons why the two types of structures are often used in legal style. We hope to make a comprehensive analysis of the usage of the willing verbs in legal style. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter lays the groundwork for this study, including the research related to this topic, the purpose and significance of the topic, the definition of the research object, the source of the research materials and research methods. The second chapter first defines the definition and scope of the wishful verbs studied in this paper, discusses the grammatical functions of the wishing verbs, and then statistics the distribution of the willing verbs in the legal style on the basis of this. Then from the perspective of modal semantics and legal stylistic characteristics of the willing verbs, this paper analyzes the reasons for the two main differences: one is the reason why "ought" and "can" appear frequently in the legal written style; The other is the reason why different characters use different wishful verbs in the spoken language of the court. The third chapter discusses the main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style. There are three main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style: first, the wishing verbs can give power (rights), the second is to set the obligation of the wishing verbs; Third, willing verbs to express the position of discourse. The fourth chapter first compares the distribution of willing verbs in legal style with that in another typical written style (novel style): in legal style, there are fewer types and uneven distribution of wishing verbs than those in novel style, and the distribution of possible verbs in legal style is less than that in the novel style, and the distribution of the verbs in the legal style is less than that in the novel style. Secondly, there is a great difference between the high-frequency willing verbs and the sentence patterns that often co-occur between the two styles: the sentence patterns in the legal written style contain multiple prepositions, and the negative forms of the willing verbs are much more than those in the novel style. Finally, from the perspective of stylistic function, this paper analyzes the causes of the differences between the possible verbs in the two styles. The fifth chapter focuses on the analysis of two common sentence patterns in legal written style: "Vcw long-term preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's", and classifies the two types of structures according to the semantic relationship and grammatical role of preposition structure and subsequent verbs respectively. Finally, the causes of the high frequency of the two types of structures are analyzed by using the theory of pattern grammar. The reason why the two structures appear in the high frequency of the legal written style is due to the "interselection" relationship between the willing verbs and the structure. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the full text content and points out some shortcomings of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳炯;論立法語(yǔ)言的風(fēng)格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2005年01期
2 李小川;情態(tài)動(dòng)詞否定之研究[J];常德師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期
3 陶紅印;試論語(yǔ)體分類的語(yǔ)法學(xué)意義[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);1999年03期
4 廖美珍;國(guó)外法律語(yǔ)言研究綜述[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2004年01期
5 王勇;;行走在語(yǔ)法和詞匯之間——型式語(yǔ)法述評(píng)[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2008年03期
6 潘慶云;;立法語(yǔ)言論略[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年01期
7 陳炯;法律語(yǔ)體中常用詞語(yǔ)的特點(diǎn)[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1987年01期
8 吳戰(zhàn)文;;淺談能愿動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)法功能[J];漢中師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1989年02期
9 林延君;談能愿動(dòng)詞后的名詞動(dòng)化[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1990年02期
10 張黎;;論刑事訴訟法中情態(tài)動(dòng)詞“可以”的主觀性[J];考試周刊;2010年17期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 宋永圭;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)情態(tài)動(dòng)詞“能”的否定研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年
2 彭利貞;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)情態(tài)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年
3 閔星雅;助動(dòng)詞“能”和“會(huì)”的認(rèn)知研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 曾艷;法律語(yǔ)言中情態(tài)動(dòng)詞的研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2437853
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2437853.html
最近更新
教材專著
