【摘要】：本文從語(yǔ)用學(xué)角度出發(fā),結(jié)合功能主義語(yǔ)言學(xué)相關(guān)理論,對(duì)比研究日常會(huì)話中標(biāo)記語(yǔ)“所以”和“so”的使用情況及各自發(fā)揮的語(yǔ)用功能。 話語(yǔ)分析作為語(yǔ)用學(xué)的一個(gè)分支,在國(guó)內(nèi)也稱為話語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言學(xué)。話語(yǔ)分析主要研究在實(shí)際語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用中具有一定交際目的的口頭和書面言語(yǔ)交際單位的結(jié)構(gòu)特點(diǎn)。話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記的研究是話語(yǔ)分析領(lǐng)域的一個(gè)重要部分,在言語(yǔ)交際中主要發(fā)揮動(dòng)態(tài)的語(yǔ)用功能,對(duì)話語(yǔ)或語(yǔ)篇理解的制約具有語(yǔ)用——認(rèn)知上的理?yè)?jù)。我們?cè)谇叭搜芯康幕A(chǔ)上,以關(guān)聯(lián)理論為依據(jù),結(jié)合語(yǔ)用學(xué)家維索爾倫(Verschueren,1999)提出的語(yǔ)言順應(yīng)理論分析作為話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記的“所以”和“so”在信息組織和言語(yǔ)行為方面的共性與區(qū)別。我們通過(guò)從漢語(yǔ)訪談?lì)惞?jié)目《魯豫有約》和英語(yǔ)訪談?lì)惞?jié)目Oprah Winfrey Show中搜集并轉(zhuǎn)寫相關(guān)語(yǔ)料,結(jié)合話輪交接規(guī)則、對(duì)答的形式結(jié)構(gòu)、下一個(gè)話輪證明法、元語(yǔ)用理論、結(jié)構(gòu)主義語(yǔ)言學(xué)及韓禮德的功能理論從語(yǔ)篇組織功能、語(yǔ)境順應(yīng)功能、人際互動(dòng)功能、和情感傳達(dá)功能等角度分析話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“所以”和“so”在話語(yǔ)生成和理解中產(chǎn)生的語(yǔ)用制約出現(xiàn)的異同。全文共分六個(gè)章節(jié)： 第一章引言。這一部分主要闡釋本文的選題緣由、研究意義、創(chuàng)新性、語(yǔ)料來(lái)源和研究方法。重點(diǎn)介紹國(guó)內(nèi)外語(yǔ)言學(xué)家對(duì)話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“所以”和“so”的研究概況。 第二章話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“所以”的功能分析。首先對(duì)“所以”自古代漢語(yǔ)至現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中的使用情況進(jìn)行分析,并界定其在不同發(fā)展階段所具有的性質(zhì)和功能；其次,對(duì)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)“所以”的結(jié)構(gòu)特征、程序性意義特征和語(yǔ)音特征進(jìn)行描寫分析； 最后,通過(guò)分析大量真實(shí)口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料,對(duì)話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“所以”在訪談?lì)惞?jié)目中所具有的語(yǔ)用功能進(jìn)行描寫和分類。 第三章話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“so”的功能分析。這一部分先是對(duì)“so”在現(xiàn)代英語(yǔ)中的多種詞性和功能進(jìn)行列舉,然后對(duì)作為標(biāo)記語(yǔ)的“so”進(jìn)行特征描寫,并側(cè)重發(fā)掘與“所以”表現(xiàn)出的不同特征。主要還是對(duì)“so”在訪談會(huì)話中體現(xiàn)出的言語(yǔ)行為功能、信息組織功能、語(yǔ)境順應(yīng)功能和情感表達(dá)功能進(jìn)行研究。 第四章話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記“所以”和“so”的比較。通過(guò)列表的方式對(duì)“所以”和“so”在語(yǔ)用功能上的異同進(jìn)行直觀對(duì)比并對(duì)全文內(nèi)容進(jìn)行總結(jié)。概括本文的局限和成果,總結(jié)話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記研究對(duì)采訪技巧和第二語(yǔ)言習(xí)得的指導(dǎo)性作用。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of pragmatics and combining the relevant theories of functionalist linguistics, this paper makes a contrastive study of the use of "so" and "so" in daily conversation and their respective pragmatic functions. As a branch of pragmatics, discourse analysis is also called discourse linguistics in China. Discourse analysis mainly studies the structural characteristics of verbal and written verbal communication units which have a certain communicative purpose in the practical use of language. The study of discourse markers is an important part in the field of discourse analysis. It plays a dynamic pragmatic role in verbal communication and has pragmatic and cognitive motivations to restrict the comprehension of discourse or discourse. On the basis of previous studies, we analyze the commonness and difference between "so" and "so" as discourse markers in information organization and speech acts, based on relevance theory and linguistic adaptation theory proposed by pragmatist Verschueren,1999. We collect and transpose the relevant language materials from the Chinese interview program Luyu Youyao and the English interview program Oprah Winfrey Show, combine the rules of turn-over, the formal structure of the answer, the next turn proof method, the meta-pragmatic theory. Structuralist linguistics and Halliday's functional theory include text organization function, contextual adaptation function, interpersonal interaction function, etc. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences of pragmatic constraints between discourse markers "so" and "so" in discourse generation and comprehension from the perspective of affective communication function. The full text is divided into six chapters: the first chapter is the introduction. This part mainly explains the reason, significance, innovation, corpus source and research method of this paper. This paper focuses on the research of discourse markers "so" and "so" at home and abroad. The second chapter analyzes the function of discourse marker "so". First of all, it analyzes the usage of "so" from ancient Chinese to modern Chinese, and defines its nature and function in different stages of development. Secondly, it analyzes the structural characteristics of the marker "so". At last, by analyzing a large amount of real spoken language data, we describe and classify the pragmatic functions of the discourse marker "so" in the interview program. Chapter three analyzes the function of discourse marker so. This part first enumerates the various parts of speech and functions of "so" in modern English, then describes the features of "so" as a marker, and emphasizes on the different features of "so" and "so". This paper mainly studies the speech act function, information organization function, contextual adaptation function and emotion expression function of "so" in interview conversation. Chapter four compares the discourse marker "so" with "so". In this paper, the similarities and differences between "so" and "so" in pragmatic functions are compared intuitively, and the content of this paper is summarized. This paper summarizes the limitations and achievements of this paper, and summarizes the guiding role of discourse markers in interview skills and second language acquisition.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H136;H313

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李恒;;話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)“這個(gè)”和“那個(gè)”的語(yǔ)用功能分析[J];文教資料;2011年32期

2 李玉英;曾祥宏;;演講語(yǔ)篇中的英漢指稱銜接手段對(duì)比分析——以?shī)W巴馬就職演說(shuō)詞為例[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年09期

3 李恒;孔昭麗;;英漢訪談節(jié)目中話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)語(yǔ)用功能對(duì)比研究[J];考試周刊;2011年68期

4 郭娟;;漢語(yǔ)中肯定性反問(wèn)應(yīng)答銜接語(yǔ)與簡(jiǎn)單應(yīng)答詞的比較[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

5 嚴(yán)靜;;英語(yǔ)專業(yè)八級(jí)口頭評(píng)論中話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)特征研究[J];瘋狂英語(yǔ)(教師版);2010年03期

6 馮潔茹;;話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)“I think”在訪談節(jié)目中的作用[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

7 邱明明;王吉民;;英漢話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)語(yǔ)用功能對(duì)比研究[J];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

8 金曉艷;;后時(shí)連接成分的連用與合用[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2006年02期

9 張德祿;矯艷;;對(duì)大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)中銜接機(jī)制運(yùn)用的調(diào)查及對(duì)教學(xué)的啟示[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2006年01期

10 張發(fā)祥;;英漢話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)語(yǔ)用功能對(duì)比[J];洛陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2230873