本文選題：詩歌 + 愛情隱喻　； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隱喻,從古至今一直是眾多學(xué)者研究的對象之一。許多學(xué)者認(rèn)為隱喻是一種修辭手段,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出隱喻修辭理論,如亞里士多德的比較論,昆體良的替代論和理查茲的互動論。自《我們賴以生存的隱喻》出版,隱喻的認(rèn)知論被越來越多的語言學(xué)家認(rèn)可。萊考夫和約翰遜提出隱喻是一種認(rèn)知現(xiàn)象,是人類感知世界,構(gòu)建概念的認(rèn)知工具;它是用一個概念領(lǐng)域去理解或說明另一個概念領(lǐng)域的思維模式。概念隱喻是從日常的隱喻表達(dá)中抽象概括出來,存在于人類思維中,具有普遍適用性的概念,如“人生是一場旅行”。愛情是一種抽象的情感也是一個永恒的話題。古往今來,歌頌愛情、贊美愛情的詩歌不勝枚舉。本文以中英文愛情詩為研究對象,通過對英漢兩種語言中愛情概念隱喻系統(tǒng)的對比分析發(fā)現(xiàn),英漢愛情隱喻即有共性又有差異性。其共性主要體現(xiàn)在:一.英漢愛情隱喻具有共同的認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ),即以聯(lián)想、想象為基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)建事物之間的聯(lián)系。二.英語、漢語雖是兩個不同的語言系統(tǒng),但都會借助不同的概念系統(tǒng)來理解愛情,如“植物”、“人體”等。其差異性主要體現(xiàn)在:一.英漢語有各自特有的愛情概念隱喻。二.在相似的愛情概念隱喻下,英漢兩種語言在具體的表達(dá)上,即隱喻的取象上存在差異。經(jīng)進(jìn)一步分析探討,該文章得出結(jié)論:不同的文化團(tuán)體以身體體驗和生活經(jīng)驗為基礎(chǔ)創(chuàng)造的概念隱喻具有相同性,但受地理環(huán)境、哲學(xué)思想、宗教文化,生產(chǎn)方式等因素的影響,隱喻又具有文化差異性。通過本文,我們首先對隱喻在構(gòu)建人類抽象概念中的重要作用有更深的認(rèn)識,其次對英漢兩種語言在認(rèn)知模式上的相似性和差異性有了進(jìn)一步的理解,希望對語言教學(xué)及英漢兩種文化的理解與交流工作盡綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:Metaphor has been one of the objects studied by many scholars since ancient times. Many scholars believe that metaphor is a rhetorical device, and on this basis put forward metaphorical rhetoric theory, such as Aristotle's theory of comparison, Quintirian's theory of substitution and Richards's theory of interaction. Since the publication of metaphor for our existence, the cognitive theory of metaphor has been accepted by more and more linguists. Lakoff and Johnson put forward that metaphor is a cognitive phenomenon which is a cognitive tool for human beings to perceive the world and construct concepts. Conceptual metaphor, which is abstracted from everyday metaphorical expressions, exists in human thinking and has universal applicability, such as "Life is a journey". Love is an abstract emotion and an eternal topic. Throughout the ages, songs of love and praise of love are endless. Based on the comparative analysis of the conceptual metaphors of love in English and Chinese, the author finds that there are similarities and differences in love metaphors between English and Chinese. Its commonness is mainly reflected in: 1. English and Chinese love metaphors have a common cognitive basis, that is to say, the relationship between things is constructed on the basis of association and imagination. II. Although English and Chinese are two different language systems, they can understand love with different conceptual systems, such as "plant" and "human body". Its difference is mainly reflected in: 1. English and Chinese have their own unique conceptual metaphors of love. II. Under similar conceptual metaphors of love, there are differences between English and Chinese in terms of their specific expressions, that is, the representation of metaphors. Through further analysis and discussion, the paper concludes that conceptual metaphors created by different cultural groups based on body experience and life experience have the same characteristics, but are influenced by geographical environment, philosophy and religious culture. Due to the influence of factors such as production mode, metaphor has cultural differences. In this paper, we first have a deeper understanding of the important role of metaphor in the construction of human abstract concepts, and then we have a further understanding of the similarities and differences in cognitive patterns between English and Chinese. I hope to contribute to the understanding and communication of language teaching and English-Chinese culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H15;H315

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 阮秋茶（NGUYEN THUTRA）;漢越語愛情隱喻對比研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1860417