本文關(guān)鍵詞： 言語行為標記 概念支持功能 人際支持功能 語篇支持功能 角色語法 語體特征　出處：《華東師范大學》2013年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：任何話語在本質(zhì)上都可以說是一種言語行為,“說”則可以說是言語行為最核心的動作,任何言語行為都是“說”的行為,因此本文將以“說”類結(jié)構(gòu)標記為切入點進行研究,力求可以有效反映漢語言語行為基本結(jié)構(gòu)及其標記的基本面貌。對于“說”類結(jié)構(gòu)標記用法的研究,漢語語言學界由來已久。但是以往多是從句法、語義、語用角度進行研究。依據(jù)“新言語行為分析”框架,我們認為：“說”類結(jié)構(gòu)標記既可以成為學術(shù)已經(jīng)認識的那樣的一種“話語標記”,更可以成為一種我們將要討論的“言語行為標記”。傳統(tǒng)研究認為,語言具有概念、語篇、人際三大“元功能”,但是“話語標記”只承擔語篇和人際功能,而與概念功能無關(guān)。我們則依據(jù)“功能塑造結(jié)構(gòu),言語行為的根本功能是實現(xiàn)交際意圖,這一功能塑造了言語行為的基本結(jié)構(gòu)：‘意圖+支持’,其基本結(jié)構(gòu)因此也可以分成兩個部分：‘意圖性言語子行為’和‘支持性言語子行為’。其中‘支持性言語子行為’又可以稱做‘標記性言語子行為’,或者說‘言語行為標記》’”的思路,第一次借助對于“說”類言語行為標記的系統(tǒng)分析,驗證了“言語行為標記也具有概念支持、語篇支持、人際支持三大功能”假設(shè)的合理性,并且由此對于概念支持、語篇支持、人際支持三大功能內(nèi)部分類進行了新的探索。傳統(tǒng)研究認為話語中“證據(jù)來源標記”等都只具有“人際功能”,我們則第一次有效揭示,在本質(zhì)上這些標記的第一功能應該是對于“命題成立與否”提供支持,是一個命題能否成立是真還是非真的必要條件,因此,應該屬于“概念功能”的范疇。傳統(tǒng)研究認為人稱代詞“他”不能進入對話框架,我們則依據(jù)“新言語行為分析”框架,有效地證明了“我／你／他+說”中人稱的變化完全可能導致言語行為類型的變化。文共分為六章：第一章介紹國內(nèi)外話語標記研究概況,在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)話語標記研究存在的主要問題。第二章介紹本文的研究思路。從“新言語行為分析”框架出發(fā)對“言語行為標記”進行概念界定,介紹本文的選題意義、核心概念以及文章研究的框架思路。第三章從概念、語篇、人際三大語言支持功能出發(fā)討論“說”言語行為標記的功能。與以往研究不同的是,本文認為言語行為標記不僅具有人際支持功能和語篇支持功能,還具有概念支持功能。我們考察了“說”類言語行為標記的三種支持功能,并對言語行為標記的多功能性進行了簡單的探討。第四章從層次、詞類、構(gòu)式三個角度討論“說”言語行為標記的結(jié)構(gòu)。在此,歸納了言語行為標記在不同層面的表現(xiàn)形式,探討了言語行為和言語行為標記之間的關(guān)系以及言語行為標記具體的分類情況。分析“說”在不同言語主體作用下發(fā)生的功能變化。從言語主體范疇出發(fā),比較了不同言語主體與“說”搭配表現(xiàn)出的不對稱性,進一步證明了言語主體存在的可能性,分析言語主體范疇及言語主體類型作為語法范疇成立的可能性。第五章從句法、語篇位置、語體三個方面來討論“說”類言語行為標記的分布情況,討論了言語行為標記和語體特征的關(guān)系。將主要討論言語行為標記和語體特征問題,通過對各種語體文本中的言語行為語標記使用情況進行數(shù)量統(tǒng)計,來討論言語行為標語與言語行為類型之間的關(guān)系,進而分析語體與言語行為類型的關(guān)系。第六章為結(jié)語,對全文進行總結(jié)回顧。
[Abstract]:Any words in nature can be said is a kind of speech act, "said" can be said to be the core of the speech act of action, any speech act is "said" behavior, so this paper will take "say" type structure marked as a starting point for research, and strive to can effectively reflect the basic features of Chinese language the basic structure and behavior marker. For "study class structure and label, long-standing Chinese linguistics. But the past is from the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspectives. Based on the analysis of" new "verbal behavioral framework, we think:" say "type structure markers can be" Discourse Markers "as the academic has been recognized, it can become a we will discuss" speech act markers ". The traditional view holds that language has the concept of discourse, interpersonal three meta functions", but "discourse subject "Only bear the textual and interpersonal functions, but has nothing to do with the concept of function. We are on the basis of the" functional shape structure, the fundamental function of speech acts is to achieve the communicative purpose, the basic structure of the shape function of speech acts: "intention + support", its basic structure and therefore can be divided into two parts: "the intention of verbal behavior" and "supportive verbal behavior". The "supportive verbal behavior" can be called "marked verbal behavior", or "speech act markers > '" ideas, the first with the "analysis system speech act markers, verified" speech act markers also haveideational, discourse support, interpersonal support three functional rationality "hypothesis, and thus to support the concept of discourse, interpersonal support, support the three functions of internal classification of the new exploration of the traditional. Study on the source of evidence in discourse markers "are" interpersonal function ", we first reveal, in essence, the first function of these markers should be the" proposition and support "whether a proposition can be established is true or not necessary, it should be, category belongs to the concept of" function ". The traditional research that the pronoun" he "cannot enter the Dialogue framework, we are on the basis of the" new speech act analysis framework, effectively proved I / you / he + says "in person completely changes may lead to changes in the type of speech act. This paper consists of six chapters. The first chapter introduces the general situation of domestic and international discourse markers, on the basis of summarizing main problems in the study of discourse markers. The second chapter introduces the research ideas of this paper. From the analysis of" "new" words on the frame of the speech act Speech act markers "concept, introduces the significance of the topic, the core concepts and the research framework. The third chapter discourses from concept, interpersonal three language support function discussed" speech act markers. It is different from previous studies, this paper that speech act markers not only has the interpersonal support function and textual support functions, but also haveideational function. We investigated the "" three support functions of speech act markers, and multiple functions of speech act markers was discussed. The fourth chapter from the hierarchy structure, lexical category, type three focuses on "speech act markers. Here, summarizes the speech act markers in different forms, to explore the relationship between speech act and speech act markers and speech act markers specific classification analysis" "In different speech subject under the action of the functional changes. Starting from the main language category, different speech subject and" saying "collocation shows asymmetry, further proved the possibility of the existence of the main speech, the speech subject category and possibility analysis of main language type as a grammatical category was established. In the fifth chapter, from the syntax discourse, position, style three aspects to discuss" the distribution of speech act markers, discusses the relationship between speech act markers and stylistic features. Mainly discusses the speech act markers and stylistic features of the problem, the number of statistics through the use of speech act language markers of various styles in the text, to discuss the relationship between speech act and speech act types of slogans, and analysis of the relationship between style and types of speech acts. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the full text review.

【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H15

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 吳亞欣,于國棟;話語標記語的元語用分析[J];外語教學;2003年04期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 李秀明;漢語元話語標記研究[D];復旦大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1545304