本文選題：新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)　切入點(diǎn)：趙本山小品　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文站在新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的視角之下對(duì)趙本山的小品進(jìn)行評(píng)述。首先介紹了論文研究的目的和意義,對(duì)該課題的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分類和總結(jié)。其次,對(duì)新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的發(fā)展、思路和內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的闡述,指出新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的觀點(diǎn)主要包括“總體性原則”“現(xiàn)實(shí)主義觀點(diǎn)”和“新典型理論”三部分內(nèi)容,并列舉了盧卡奇和布萊希特兩位代表人物,然后站在新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)視角之下對(duì)趙本山小品進(jìn)行評(píng)述,一是要對(duì)“娛樂(lè)至上”的現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行批判,二是要引導(dǎo)大眾文化朝著健康的方向發(fā)展。本文研究的內(nèi)容主要是趙本山歷年來(lái)在春晚舞臺(tái)上呈現(xiàn)的小品,將趙本山春晚的小品按照合作對(duì)象進(jìn)行分類,然后分別從大眾化、“雅”和“俗”、諷刺性三個(gè)方面分析了趙本山小品的藝術(shù)特征。盡管趙本山的小品獲得了很多觀眾的認(rèn)可,但是同樣需要站在新馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的視角對(duì)趙本山的小品進(jìn)行反思,首先趙本山的部分小品存在文化內(nèi)涵缺失,以低俗和媚俗制造笑料和缺乏喜劇精神,商業(yè)色彩濃重等問(wèn)題。從文藝大眾化的角度發(fā)現(xiàn)趙本山的小品存在脫離大眾和“愚樂(lè)”大眾的趨勢(shì),這些問(wèn)題讓趙本山的小品廣受公眾質(zhì)疑和抨擊。但是盡管如此,趙本山的小品還是給中國(guó)千家萬(wàn)戶帶來(lái)了歡樂(lè),同時(shí)在大眾文化匱乏的年代推動(dòng)了大眾文化的發(fā)展,小品中抨擊的一些社會(huì)現(xiàn)象也確實(shí)引發(fā)了公眾的反思。文藝作品的內(nèi)容和形式非常豐富,因?yàn)楸娍陔y調(diào),所以不能保證任何一部文藝作品都能夠得到所有受眾的好評(píng),也不能單純片面的去評(píng)論一部文藝作品的好與壞。對(duì)于任何一種文藝作品,都要以欣賞和批評(píng)的雙重眼光去看待,對(duì)文藝作品的客觀評(píng)價(jià)也是對(duì)文藝創(chuàng)作者的一種尊重。
[Abstract]:This paper reviews Zhao Benshan's essays from the perspective of neo-Marxist literary criticism. Firstly, it introduces the purpose and significance of the research, classifies and summarizes the present research situation of this subject. This paper briefly expounds the development, thought and content of new Marxist literary criticism, and points out that the viewpoint of new Marxist literary criticism mainly includes three parts: "overall principle", "realistic viewpoint" and "new typical theory". And listed Lukacs and Brecht two representative figures, and then from the perspective of the new Marxist literary criticism to comment on Zhao Benshan, the first is to criticize the phenomenon of "entertainment supremacy". Second, it is necessary to guide the development of popular culture in a healthy direction. The contents of this paper are mainly the sketches that Zhao Benshan presented on the stage of the Spring Festival Gala over the years, classifying the pieces of the Spring Festival Gala by the objects of cooperation. Then it analyzes the artistic characteristics of Zhao Benshan's sketches from the aspects of popularization, elegance and vulgarity, respectively. However, it is also necessary to reflect on Zhao Benshan's sketches from the perspective of new Marxist literary criticism. First of all, there is a lack of cultural connotation in some of Zhao Benshan's sketches, making jokes with vulgarity and vulgarity and lacking the spirit of comedy. From the point of view of the popularization of literature and art, we found that Zhao Benshan's sketches tend to be divorced from the masses and the "folly" masses. These problems have caused the public to question and criticize Zhao Benshan's sketches. But even so, Zhao Benshan's sketches brought joy to thousands of families in China, and at the same time promoted the development of popular culture in an era of lack of popular culture. Some of the social phenomena attacked in the essays have indeed triggered public reflection. The contents and forms of literary works are very rich, because the masses are difficult to adjust, so there is no guarantee that any literary and artistic works will be well received by all the audiences. Nor can we simply and one-sidedly comment on the good or bad of a literary work. For any kind of literary and artistic work, we should treat it with both appreciation and criticism, and the objective evaluation of literary and artistic works is also a respect for the writers and artists of literature and art.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：J827

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王孝坤;中國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)文化選擇與發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的隱喻——趙本山影視文化現(xiàn)象的文化詩(shī)學(xué)解讀與思考[J];劇作家;2005年02期

2 孫文憲;;馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的問(wèn)題意識(shí)[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1677072