【摘要】：威廉·戈?duì)柖?1911-1993)在當(dāng)代英國(guó)文壇有著廣泛的影響力,并且于1983年獲得諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)。其代表作《蠅王》自發(fā)表以來(lái)受到許多學(xué)者的青睞,他們從不同視角對(duì)小說(shuō)進(jìn)行了分析。通過(guò)研究國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn),筆者發(fā)現(xiàn),從德里達(dá)動(dòng)態(tài)文本理論視角來(lái)分析《蠅王》還存在很大的空間。本文運(yùn)用德里達(dá)動(dòng)態(tài)文本理論解讀《蠅王》,揭示了文本意義和人性的不確定性。 首先,本文介紹了作家和作品,回顧了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)《蠅王》的研究,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)及其意義所在。其次,本文重點(diǎn)闡述了德里達(dá)動(dòng)態(tài)文本理論中的互文性和延異觀,運(yùn)用互文性中的原型和反諷手法挖掘了小說(shuō)含有其他文本的蹤跡,說(shuō)明了文本意義的產(chǎn)生依賴于讀者、作者和文本之間的對(duì)話與交流,揭示了文本是開放的,互相指涉的,進(jìn)而說(shuō)明了《蠅王》意義的不確定性。此外,本文運(yùn)用延異觀闡述了《蠅王》中的人物、時(shí)間、地點(diǎn)和意象的不確定性,詮釋了人性和文本意義的不確定性。最后,本文還原了“人性惡”和戈?duì)柖?duì)人性的思考,將人性的多樣性寓于不確定性中。 本文通過(guò)運(yùn)用德里達(dá)動(dòng)態(tài)文本理論中的互文性和延異觀,消解了傳統(tǒng)理論對(duì)《蠅王》的研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)了單純的“人性惡”難以涵蓋文本蘊(yùn)含的深層含義。本文的研究旨在為讀者解讀《蠅王》提供新的視野和思路,使讀者更加全面地看待小說(shuō)中的人性變化、更深層次地領(lǐng)悟小說(shuō)的精髓。
[Abstract]:William Golding (1911-1993) has a wide influence in contemporary English literature and won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1983. His masterpiece, Lord of the flies, has been favored by many scholars since it was published, and they have analyzed the novel from different perspectives. By studying the literature at home and abroad, the author finds that there is still much room for the analysis of Lord of the flies from the perspective of Derrida's dynamic text theory. This paper uses Derrida's dynamic text theory to interpret Lord of the flies and reveals the uncertainty of text meaning and human nature. First of all, this paper introduces the writers and works, reviews the research of the Lord of the flies at home and abroad, and puts forward the innovation and significance of this paper. Secondly, this paper focuses on the intertextuality and extension of Derrida's dynamic text theory, and uses the archetypal and ironic techniques of intertextuality to excavate the traces of other texts in the novel, which shows that the meaning of the text depends on the reader. The dialogue and communication between the author and the text reveal that the text is open and refers to each other, thus explaining the uncertainty of the meaning of Lord of the flies. In addition, this paper expounds the uncertainty of characters, time, place and image in Lord of the flies by using the concept of extension, and explains the uncertainty of human nature and the meaning of the text. Finally, this paper restores the "evil of human nature" and Golding's thinking of human nature, putting the diversity of human nature in the uncertainty. By using Derrida's theory of intertextuality and variation, this paper dispels the traditional theory of "Lord of the flies" and finds that the simple "evil of human nature" can hardly cover the deep meaning of the text. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a new vision and train of thought for the interpretation of Lord of the flies, so that the readers can take a more comprehensive view of the changes of human nature in the novel and comprehend the essence of the novel in a deeper level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I561.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張中載;《蠅王》出版四十周年重讀《蠅王》[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);1995年01期

2 魏穎超;童貞的泯滅——評(píng)威廉·戈?duì)柖〉男≌f(shuō)《蠅王》對(duì)人性陰暗面的披露[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

3 黃淑瓊;;《蠅王》中日神與酒神精神的沖突[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 方菊華;;神話原型觀照下的《蠅王》圣經(jīng)元素解讀[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年09期

5 陳李萍;;惡的“延異”——《蠅王》中人性的不確定性[J];名作欣賞;2006年18期

6 王衛(wèi)新;中國(guó)的《蠅王》研究:回顧與前瞻[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2003年04期

7 陶家俊;論《蠅王》的敘述結(jié)構(gòu)和主題意義[J];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

8 周峰;現(xiàn)代諷喻語(yǔ)境下的神話——試析《蠅王》中的幾個(gè)原型意象[J];山東師大外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

9 胡蕾;狄奧尼索斯的報(bào)復(fù)——《蠅王》之神話原型分析與重釋[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2000年02期

10 于海青;“情所獨(dú)鐘”處──從《蠅王》中的殺豬“幕間劇”說(shuō)開去[J];國(guó)外文學(xué);1996年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張文娟;互文性視角下的《蠅王》[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年

2 彭楠;論《蠅王》對(duì)西方傳統(tǒng)文化的顛覆[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

3 王春雨;《蠅王》的后現(xiàn)代主義特征[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2256601