本文關鍵詞：從二元對立的視角解讀《喧嘩與騷動》與《紅高梁家族》　出處：《湖南大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 二元對立 福克納 莫言 《喧嘩與騷動》 《紅高粱家族》

【摘要】：�？思{的小說《喧嘩與騷動》表現出福克納對其故鄉(xiāng)堅持著既眷戀又批評的精神立場。莫言從�？思{這種強烈的鄉(xiāng)土觀念中重新認知了自己的故鄉(xiāng)，并且形成了與�？思{相似的精神走向。莫言的這一精神走向主要體現在其家族小說《紅高粱家族》中。 兩部小說都是以各自的家鄉(xiāng)為背景，過去與現在都交織于小說中，而且都表現出作者對其家鄉(xiāng)矛盾和復雜感情，這種矛盾和復雜就暗示了小說中存在著大量的二元對立現象。二元對立原則作為結構主義的核心思想，經常被用來分析文學作品的深層含義。結構主義學家認為通過文本中合適的二元對立對并且分析這些對立在文本中是如何互相關聯的就可以解碼文本，探索到文本的深層含義�；诖�，本文擬通過比較分析兩個文本在主題和人物方面相似的二元對立來探索兩個文本藝術思想的相似性。 首先，對形成�？思{和莫言創(chuàng)作思想中二元對立的共同原因進行探索。主要的共同原因有兩個，一是故鄉(xiāng)對他們的影響，二是他們所處的特殊時代背景。然后通過分析主題方面的二元對立，可以發(fā)現兩位作者對傳統和現代價值觀的態(tài)度：他們都懷著對過去和傳統摯愛的感情，但是�？思{是在傳統和現代的對立中告別傳統，而莫言則在過去與現在的對立中推崇過去。最后，通過比較人物方面的對立，可以發(fā)現兩位作者都對人性以及造成人性的社會背景進行了探索。兩位作者都對人性的正義面持肯定的態(tài)度，但面對人性的弱點，�？思{是徹底抨擊而莫言則覺得這是人性的真實存在的一面，應該客觀對待。 通過二元對立的原則分析文本，可以得知在對故鄉(xiāng)的藝術構建中，莫言和�？思{堅持類似的精神立場。這種相似性并非偶然的，而是因為他們有著類似的生活和社會經驗。此外，盡管兩人精神立場是類似的，但是通過比較可以發(fā)現莫言借鑒并吸收了福克納的藝術思想，在借鑒并吸收的這一過程中莫言融入了屬于中國現代化進程中的特殊情境。由此也可以從一個側面顯示，以莫言等為代表的當代作家能夠坦然面對世界文學，并能學以致用，這既豐富了中國的當代文學創(chuàng)作，也使中國的當代文學能夠迅速地融入世界文學大潮。
[Abstract]:Faulkner's novel the Sound and the Fury shows Faulkner's spiritual position of attachment and criticism to his hometown. Mo Yan reunderstands his hometown from Faulkner's strong local concept. The spirit trend of Mo Yan is mainly embodied in his family novel Red Sorghum Family. The two novels are both based on their hometown, the past and the present are intertwined in the novel, and both show the author's ambivalence and complex feelings towards his hometown. This contradiction and complexity implies the existence of a large number of binary opposites in the novel, the principle of dualism as the core of structuralism. It is often used to analyze the deep meaning of literary works. Structuralists believe that the text can be decoded by analyzing the appropriate binary pairs in the text and how these antagonisms are related to each other in the text. Based on this, this paper attempts to explore the similarities of the two texts' artistic thoughts by comparing and analyzing the dualistic antagonism between the two texts in terms of their themes and characters. First of all, the formation of Faulkner and Mo Yan in the creation of dual opposition to the common cause of exploration. The main common reasons are two, one is the influence of hometown on them. Second, they are in the special background of the times, and then through the analysis of the duality of the theme, we can find the two writers' attitude towards traditional and modern values: they all have feelings of love for the past and tradition. But Faulkner said goodbye to tradition in the opposition between tradition and modernity, while Mo Yan praised the past in the opposition between the past and the present. It can be found that both authors have explored human nature and its social background. Both authors hold positive attitudes towards the just aspect of human nature, but face the weakness of human nature. Faulkner is a thorough attack and Mo Yan thinks that this is the real existence of human nature and should be treated objectively. Through the analysis of the principle of duality, we can know that Mo Yan and Faulkner adhere to a similar spiritual position in the art construction of their hometown. This similarity is not accidental. It is because they have similar life and social experience. In addition, although the two people's spiritual position is similar, it can be found that Mo Yan learned from and absorbed Faulkner's artistic thought through comparison. In the process of drawing lessons from and absorbing Mo Yan is integrated into the special situation in the process of China's modernization. Thus it can also be shown from a side that contemporary writers such as Mo Yan can face the world literature calmly. It not only enriches China's contemporary literary creation, but also enables Chinese contemporary literature to quickly integrate into the tide of world literature.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I106.4-03

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊金才;《喧嘩與騷動》的藝術整體感與意識流小說結構[J];當代外國文學;1994年01期

2 M.托馬斯·英奇,金衡山;比較研究:莫言與�？思{[J];當代作家評論;2001年02期

3 劉江凱;;本土性、民族性的世界寫作——莫言的海外傳播與接受[J];當代作家評論;2011年04期

4 武月明;天使/妖婦《喧嘩與騷動》中的凱蒂形象讀解[J];外國文學;2002年01期

5 楊彩霞;;《喧嘩與騷動》與圣經文學傳統的相關性研究[J];外國文學;2009年03期

6 肖明翰;試論�？思{筆下的婦女形象[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);1993年04期

7 肖明翰;�？思{主要寫作手法的探討[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);1995年01期

8 姚乃強;兼容有序 聚焦文化──談90年代�？思{研究的態(tài)勢[J];四川外語學院學報;2004年05期

9 紀琳;;中國�？思{研究回顧與展望[J];山東外語教學;2006年02期

10 雷達;;靈性激活歷史[J];上海文學;1987年01期

，

本文編號：1361251