【摘要】： 《江格爾》是蒙古民間流傳下來(lái)的著名史詩(shī),是一部記敘英雄事跡的長(zhǎng)篇史詩(shī)。講述了英雄首領(lǐng)江格爾建立、保衛(wèi)自己寶木巴王國(guó)的過(guò)程。它是蒙古族數(shù)百部英雄史詩(shī)中最優(yōu)秀的一部,也是最能代表蒙古史詩(shī)發(fā)展水平的作品。由“江格爾齊”們演唱并且代代相傳,是我國(guó)一宗有著重要?dú)v史意義和文學(xué)價(jià)值的寶貴遺產(chǎn)。 同樣以氏族部落戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)為題材的史詩(shī),西方有大型史詩(shī)——荷馬史詩(shī),荷馬史詩(shī)是古希臘瑰麗的文化遺產(chǎn),它由《伊里亞特》與《奧德賽》兩部英雄史詩(shī)構(gòu)成。尤其以《伊里亞特》為勝。兩部史詩(shī)同為歌頌英雄的史詩(shī),本論文從兩部史詩(shī)主要英雄形象這個(gè)點(diǎn)切入,來(lái)體會(huì)史詩(shī)帶給我們的各個(gè)方面的享受。 在探討主要英雄形象之前,論文對(duì)“英雄”以及“史詩(shī)英雄”的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行界定,為后文的論述打下理論基礎(chǔ)。 史詩(shī)在人物形象的塑造上有許多相似之處。例如:英雄身上所體現(xiàn)出來(lái)的“神”性和“人”性,以及英雄形象這個(gè)特殊身份的解構(gòu)與建構(gòu)。兩部史詩(shī)的主要英雄形象有這么多的相同點(diǎn),究其深層原因,是因?yàn)閮刹渴吩?shī)所處的社會(huì)發(fā)展階段相同,指導(dǎo)兩部史詩(shī)寫作的原始思維有許多相似之處。 盡管有相同之處,但主要英雄人物也有表現(xiàn)出很大的差異�！督駹枴分杏⑿廴宋矬w現(xiàn)出的是蒙古族所特有的驍勇善戰(zhàn),團(tuán)結(jié)和集體主義精神;《伊利亞特》中的英雄形象則展示出古希臘所特有的人本思想——為個(gè)人的榮譽(yù)和利益而戰(zhàn)。究其原因,是產(chǎn)生兩部史詩(shī)的地理環(huán)境和宗教信仰不同。 通過(guò)比較兩部史詩(shī)英雄人物形象的同質(zhì)性與異質(zhì)性,論文的第四部分著眼于兩部史詩(shī)的藝術(shù)手法,是豐富的藝術(shù)手法塑造了兩位活靈活現(xiàn)的主要英雄人物。通過(guò)對(duì)史詩(shī)人物塑造方法的總結(jié),使《江格爾》與《伊利亞特》在人物形象的比較研究上更為系統(tǒng)化、理論化,也為我們塑造人物形象提供了理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Jangger is a famous epics handed down by Mongolian folk and a long epic about heroic deeds. It tells about the heroic leader Jangger's process of establishing and defending his own kingdom of Baomba. It is the best of hundreds of Mongol heroic epics and the most representative of Mongolian epic development. Sung by Jiangerqi and handed down from generation to generation, it is a valuable heritage of historical significance and literary value in China. In the west, there is a large epic-Homer epic, which is the magnificent cultural heritage of ancient Greece. It is composed of two heroic epics: Eliat and Odysseus. Especially Iriat. The two epics are the epics in praise of heroes. This paper starts with the main heroic images of the two epics to experience the enjoyment of the epics in all aspects. Before discussing the main hero image, the paper defines the connotation of "hero" and "epic hero", and lays a theoretical foundation for the later discussion. The epic has many similarities in the portrayal of characters. For example, the "divine" and "human" nature embodied in the hero, as well as the deconstruction and construction of the special identity of the hero image. There are so many similarities between the main heroic images of the two epics, the deep reason is that the two epics are in the same stage of social development, and there are many similarities in the original thinking guiding the writing of the two epics. Although there are similarities, the main heroes also show great differences. The heroes in < Jangger] embody the unique warrior of the Mongols. The spirit of unity and collectivism; the hero image in Iliad shows the unique humanism of ancient Greece-fighting for the honor and interests of the individual. The reason is that the geographical environment and religious beliefs of the two epics are different. By comparing the homogeneity and heterogeneity of the images of the two epic heroes, the fourth part of the paper focuses on the artistic techniques of the two epics. By summing up the methods of portraying the characters of epic poems, the comparative study of the characters of "Jangger" and "Iliad" is systematized and theorized, which also provides a theoretical basis for us to portray the characters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：I0-03;I106

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 裴玉;新疆和布克賽爾蒙古族史詩(shī)《江格爾》說(shuō)唱藝術(shù)傳承研究[D];新疆師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2236794