本文選題：文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評 + 存在主義�。� 參考：《外國文學(xué)研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：薩特存在主義哲學(xué)從一開始就有一種倫理的向度,它和文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評一樣關(guān)心文學(xué)和社會中的道德問題,因此兩者之間存在對話的可能。由于薩特把自我想象成一種絕對孤獨的存在,這導(dǎo)致他把自我的本真性而非倫理責任視為自我選擇的道德依據(jù),并把人在選擇前的倫理考量視為逃避自由的自欺。而文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評認為,自由不是一種純粹的主觀價值,因為自我只有意識到其他道德主體的需求,才最能感受到自由的價值。倫理選擇的核心問題就是自我與他人的關(guān)系問題,這種關(guān)系不僅意味著相互的責任,也意味著對彼此的理解、同情和包容。文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評并不把人的倫理身份和責任看作對自由的限制,這是對人的真實存在條件的深刻把握,并把人的自由內(nèi)涵提升到一個新高度。
[Abstract]:Sartre's existentialist philosophy has an ethical dimension from the beginning. It is as concerned with the moral issues in literature and society as literary ethical criticism, so there is a possibility of dialogue between the two. Because Sartre imagines the self as a kind of absolute loneliness, this leads him to regard the true nature of the self rather than the ethical responsibility as the moral basis of his own choice, and to regard the ethical considerations before the choice as the self-deception to escape freedom. The literary ethics criticism holds that freedom is not a pure subjective value because the ego can feel the value of freedom most only if it is aware of the needs of other moral subjects. The core issue of ethical choice is the relationship between self and others, which means not only mutual responsibility, but also mutual understanding, sympathy and tolerance. Literary ethics criticism does not regard human's ethical identity and responsibility as the restriction of freedom, which is a profound grasp of the real conditions of human existence, and elevates the connotation of human freedom to a new height.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評:理論建構(gòu)與批評實踐研究”【項目批號:13&ZD128】的階段性成果
【分類號】：I06
，

本文編號：1864077