本文選題：地方　切入點：地方轉向　出處：《外國文學》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：作為重要的跨學科關鍵詞,"地方"的歷史悠久。開端于古希臘哲學,"地方"批評在20世紀以來呈現(xiàn)出多元化的發(fā)展態(tài)勢�，F(xiàn)象學派、人文地理學家以及部分生態(tài)學家主張將"地方"看作帶給人地方感、具有明顯邊界和穩(wěn)定特征的固定場所;然而,馬克思主義社會建構論者與后現(xiàn)代批評家們認為"流動的地方"早已取代"固定的地方"成為現(xiàn)代社會的發(fā)展趨勢。他們認為"固定的地方"概念過于保守,具有濃烈的排斥他者的動機,主張在"時空壓縮"的現(xiàn)代社會中,具有混雜身份的人們應該不受約束地以"遷移式的"形式去適應"流動的地方"。"固定的地方"面臨現(xiàn)代社會變革的沖擊,而"流動的地方"也極易淪為資本主義追逐價值的工具。更嚴重的是,"流動的地方"會成為霸權地方政策威脅他者"階級""民族"甚至是"國家"邊界的借口。由此可知,"地方"在現(xiàn)代社會背景下并不只是地理學的范疇,也不限于生態(tài)批評的領域,而是涉及政治綱領、民族處境以及經(jīng)濟行為的混合體。
[Abstract]:As an important interdisciplinary key word, "place" has a long history. It began in ancient Greek philosophy. Since 20th century, "local" criticism has shown a pluralistic development trend. Humanistic geographers and some ecologists advocate "place" as a fixed place that gives people a sense of place, with distinct boundaries and stable characteristics; however, Marxist social constructionists and postmodern critics believe that "floating place" has long replaced "fixed place" as the development trend of modern society. They think that the concept of "fixed place" is too conservative. Having strong motives for excluding others, advocating in a modern society of "space-time compression", People with mixed identities should adapt to "flowing places" in the form of "migration" unrestrained. "fixed places" face the impact of modern social change. What is more, "flowing place" will become an excuse for hegemonic local policy to threaten the "class", "nation" and even "state" of the hegemonic local policy. From this we can see that "place" is not just a geographical category in the context of modern society. Nor is it confined to the realm of ecological criticism, but a mixture of political platforms, ethnic situations and economic behaviour.
【作者單位】： 首都師范大學大學英語教研部;北京外國語大學英語學院;
【分類號】：I0
，

本文編號：1602916