本文選題：寓言 + 意識(shí)形態(tài)��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文的主旨是把詹姆遜在文學(xué)文化批評(píng)中發(fā)展的新馬克思主義理論系統(tǒng)化,并且對(duì)其進(jìn)行批判性分析。論文開(kāi)始部分介紹后現(xiàn)代馬克思主義批評(píng)氛圍以及詹姆遜在當(dāng)代文學(xué)文化批評(píng)領(lǐng)域的突出地位。然后在主體部分詹姆遜的文學(xué)文化批評(píng)理論被系統(tǒng)化并加以分析,以找出其理論對(duì)馬克思主義的發(fā)展和偏離。最后,論文以評(píng)述詹姆遜理論的意義而結(jié)束。 論文分為五部分:第一部分是緒論,介紹后現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)境下西方文化批評(píng)領(lǐng)域里的主要流派,包括西方馬克思主義主要流派或批評(píng)人物,即通常所說(shuō)的新左派,以及后結(jié)構(gòu)主義,同時(shí)介紹了詹姆遜與他們的關(guān)系。在此,詹姆遜理論與新左派的聯(lián)系以及詹姆遜對(duì)馬克思主義的發(fā)展、與新左派相比詹姆遜的創(chuàng)新之處和他的后結(jié)構(gòu)主義情節(jié)將得到說(shuō)明。 第一章和第二章是論文的主體部分,旨在系統(tǒng)化詹姆遜文學(xué)文化文本的政治闡釋理論,并分析其理論的合理性。第一章分為三部分:第一部分系統(tǒng)化詹姆遜文學(xué)文本的政治闡釋理論并進(jìn)行分析。同時(shí),一些核心概念如歷史、寓言、意識(shí)形態(tài)等將得到闡述。這些概念是詹姆遜闡釋理論模型的基本構(gòu)成部分,也恰恰是詹姆遜理論中存在問(wèn)題的地方。第二部分探析這些存在問(wèn)題的概念。正是這些概念決定了詹姆遜理論的形而上學(xué)本質(zhì)及其對(duì)馬克思主義的偏離。第三部分對(duì)詹姆遜的政治闡釋學(xué)及其馬克思主義偏離進(jìn)行歸納。第二章也分為三部分。第一部分闡述詹姆遜的后現(xiàn)代現(xiàn)象分析及其得出的結(jié)論—晚期資本主義文化邏輯,或者說(shuō)文化的商品化以及商品的文化化。這里幾個(gè)核心概念如空間轉(zhuǎn)向、認(rèn)知測(cè)繪、烏托邦等將得到闡釋。第二部分詹姆遜對(duì)市場(chǎng)和群體多元主義的分析將受到批判審視,以便暴露其政治闡釋理論的缺陷。第三部分建構(gòu)包括后現(xiàn)代文化批評(píng)在內(nèi)的詹姆遜政治闡釋的批評(píng)模型。 論文的第三章評(píng)述詹姆遜理論的文化意義與歷史意義。 最后一部分是結(jié)論:詹姆遜的理論大體上是半唯名論性質(zhì)的,符合后現(xiàn)代的時(shí)代精神。一方面他繼承了馬克思主義文化批評(píng)的社會(huì)批評(píng)傳統(tǒng),復(fù)興了一些關(guān)鍵的馬克思主義概念;另一方面,他把這些核心概念轉(zhuǎn)換成形而上學(xué)模型以便適應(yīng)后現(xiàn)代主義的理論氣候。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this thesis is to systematize and critically analyze Jameson's new Marxist theory developed in literary and cultural criticism. At the beginning of the thesis, it introduces the post-modern Marxist criticism atmosphere and Jameson's prominent position in the field of contemporary literary and cultural criticism. Then Jameson's theory of literary and cultural criticism is systematized and analyzed in order to find out the development and deviation of his theory to Marxism. Finally, the thesis concludes with a review of the significance of Jameson's theory. The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, which introduces the main schools of western cultural criticism in the post-modern context, including the main schools or critics of Western Marxism, that is, the neo-left, and post-structuralism. At the same time, the relationship between Jameson and them is introduced. The relationship between Jameson's theory and the New left and the development of Jameson's Marxism, the innovation of Jameson and his post-structuralism will be explained. The first and second chapters are the main part of the thesis, aiming at systematizing the political interpretation theory of Jameson's literary and cultural texts and analyzing the rationality of his theory. Chapter one is divided into three parts: the first part systematizes and analyzes the political interpretation of Jameson's literary texts. At the same time, some core concepts such as history, fable, ideology and so on will be elaborated. These concepts are the basic components of Jameson's interpretation theory model, and are also the problems in Jameson's theory. The second part analyzes the concept of these existing problems. It is these concepts that determine the metaphysical nature of Jameson's theory and its deviation from Marxism. The third part summarizes Jameson's political hermeneutics and its Marxist deviation. The second chapter is also divided into three parts. The first part expounds Jameson's analysis of postmodern phenomena and its conclusion-the logic of late capitalist culture, or the commercialization of culture and the culturalization of commodities. Several core concepts, such as spatial turning, cognitive mapping, and utopia, will be explained here. In the second part, Jameson's analysis of market and group pluralism will be critically examined in order to expose the defects of his theory of political interpretation. The third part constructs the critical model of Jameson's political interpretation including post-modern cultural criticism. The third chapter reviews the cultural and historical significance of Jameson's theory. The last part is the conclusion: Jameson's theory is semi-nominalism and conforms to the spirit of post-modern times. On the one hand, he inherited the tradition of social criticism of Marxist cultural criticism and revived some key Marxist concepts; on the other hand, he transformed these core concepts into metaphysical models in order to adapt to the theoretical climate of postmodernism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I06

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蘇仲樂(lè);文化批評(píng)的實(shí)踐[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張彩云;試論詹姆遜的“馬克思主義”[D];福建師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2064011