兩種哲學(xué)背景下的文學(xué)精神
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-07 01:16
本文關(guān)鍵詞:兩種哲學(xué)背景下的文學(xué)精神 出處:《南京師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 神化哲學(xué) 詩(shī)化哲學(xué) 文學(xué)精神
【摘要】: 鑒于詩(shī)學(xué)本身就是一種哲學(xué),詩(shī)與哲學(xué)關(guān)系密切。本文將對(duì)文學(xué)精神的考察置于哲學(xué)背景之下。將哲學(xué)的思想傾向概括為兩種基本形態(tài):“神化哲學(xué)”和“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”。二者一系列截然相反的特質(zhì)決定了對(duì)文學(xué)精神的不同訴求。 第一章著重分析“神化哲學(xué)”背景下的文學(xué)。以古典主義時(shí)期的柏拉圖、亞里士多德為代表,以“神化哲學(xué)”的兩個(gè)重要特質(zhì)——本質(zhì)主義和二元論為切入點(diǎn),說(shuō)明“神化哲學(xué)”自上而下、由哲學(xué)到文學(xué)的路線(xiàn)違逆了文學(xué)的特質(zhì),是在用哲學(xué)式思維侵害文學(xué),嚴(yán)重背離文學(xué)精神,是幽閉文學(xué)的千年“古井”。第二章著重分析另一種形態(tài)的哲學(xué)——“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”。首先結(jié)合亞里士多德的“凈化說(shuō)”,指出道德是文學(xué)的倫理重負(fù);以此補(bǔ)充說(shuō)明“神化哲學(xué)”產(chǎn)生的根源,并兩相對(duì)照,說(shuō)明“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”的產(chǎn)生及其特質(zhì);最后則以能夠體現(xiàn)“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”主要特質(zhì)的羅蒂哲學(xué)來(lái)說(shuō)明,“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”采取的路徑順應(yīng)了文學(xué)的特質(zhì),是應(yīng)該推存的一種哲學(xué)姿態(tài)。 前兩章是從文學(xué)最重要的外部關(guān)系——哲學(xué)的角度,探討如何定位文學(xué)在人類(lèi)精神價(jià)值體系中的位置。這種探討角度十分重要,但并不能取代對(duì)更為“純粹”的探索。所以最后一章從文學(xué)的內(nèi)部要素中,唯一具有價(jià)值判斷能力的創(chuàng)作者這一因素入手,說(shuō)明直接激勵(lì)作家進(jìn)行創(chuàng)作的深層動(dòng)因,并不是“神化哲學(xué)”所賦予文學(xué)的一切正面價(jià)值,而恰恰是“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”所承認(rèn)的一系列生命的真相;最后一部分則緊緊抓住“時(shí)間”這一根本性因素,說(shuō)明文學(xué)的精神價(jià)值即反抗歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí),拒絕單一?偠灾,對(duì)個(gè)人而言,是以有限達(dá)到無(wú)限豐富,撫慰處境沮喪的無(wú)助個(gè)人;對(duì)人類(lèi)來(lái)說(shuō),則是相互體認(rèn),消除壁壘,自下而上自然達(dá)到“大同”。
[Abstract]:In view of poetry itself is a philosophy, poetry and philosophy are closely related. This paper will examine in the philosophical background of literary spirit under the general tendency of philosophy. The idea of two basic forms: "deified philosophy" and "poetic philosophy". A series of two opposite characteristics determines the different demands of the spirit of literature.
The first chapter focuses on the analysis of "deified philosophy" under the background of literature. In the classical period of Platon, Aristotle as the representative, with the "two important characteristics of deified philosophy" -- essentialism and dualism as the starting point, "deified philosophy" from top to bottom, from zhe learned literature route against the characteristics of literature, is in use philosophical thinking against the literature, a serious departure from the spirit of literature, literature is claustrophobic Millennium ancient philosophy. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of another form of "poetic philosophy". According to Aristotle's "purification", points out that morality is the ethical burden of literature; to add that "the root of deified philosophy" and that, in comparison, "poetic philosophy" and its characteristics; finally, to reflect the main characteristics of poetic philosophy of Lottie's philosophy that "poetic philosophy The path adopted by "learning" conforms to the character of literature and is a philosophical gesture that should be put aside.
The two chapter is literature from the most important external relations -- a philosophical point of view, to explore how to position in the value system of the human spirit in the position of literature. This research angle is very important, but is not a substitute for more "pure" exploration. Therefore the last chapter from the literature of the internal factors, only this factor has the value judgment of creator, that causes the direct excitation of writers, is not all positive values "deified philosophy endowed by literature, it is poetic philosophy that a series of life; the last part is to grasp the" time "this fundamental factors. That is against the spiritual value of literature history and reality, to single. In short, for individuals with finite to infinite rich, comforts depressed individual; the man said, is. Mutual recognition, elimination of barriers, from the bottom to the top of the "Great Harmony".
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:I0-02
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 余虹;尼采:形而上學(xué)的真理與我們的真理[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
2 余虹;;文學(xué)理論的學(xué)理性與寄生性[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年04期
3 余虹;20年代新文學(xué)自主論及其與革命文學(xué)理論的沖突[J];新疆大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期
4 R.羅蒂,李紅;當(dāng)代分析哲學(xué)中的一種實(shí)用主義觀(guān)點(diǎn)[J];世界哲學(xué);2003年03期
,本文編號(hào):1390355
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/1390355.html
教材專(zhuān)著