發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-16 19:28

【摘要】：正劉九庵先生在《王寵書法作品的辨?zhèn)巍芬晃闹辛猩虾２┪镳^藏《游包山集》(以下簡稱"上博本")為偽作,但并沒有說明定偽的理由。[1]薛龍春《王寵的作偽與偽作》一文中也將上博本列入"不可靠的王寵傳世小楷作品",他主要依據(jù)王寵小楷真跡的特點(diǎn)與偽作進(jìn)行的風(fēng)格比較來體認(rèn)。[2]上述二先生都認(rèn)定上博本《游包山集》為偽作,且多依風(fēng)格做出判斷,然而筆者在關(guān)注該卷小楷作品的印章時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)前人對它們的認(rèn)定存在一些分歧和謬
[Abstract]:Mr. Liu Jiuan listed the collection of the Shanghai Museum's Collection of Mount Youbao (hereinafter referred to as "Shangbo Ben") as a pseudonym in "the Identification of falsehood in Wang Cong's calligraphy works". However, there is no reason for determining forgery. [1] Xue Longchun's "fake and fake works by Wang Cong" also included the Shang Bo Ben in the "unreliable works of Wang Cong handed down to the world in small block letters". He recognized it mainly according to the characteristics of Wang Cong Xiaokai's genuine works and the style comparison of the fake works. [2] the two gentlemen mentioned above both recognized that the Shangbo Ben, the Collection of Tour Baoshan, was a fake work, and made more judgments according to the style. However, when I pay attention to the seal of this volume, I find that there are some differences and errors in the previous works.
【作者單位】： 首都師范大學(xué)中國書法文化研究院;
【分類號】：J292.4

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐勇剛;文征明書畫鑒藏活動(dòng)研究[D];中央美術(shù)學(xué)院;2014年

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 高翔;;薛龍春在波士頓[J];中國書畫;2010年06期

2 劉東芹;;唯深識書者能為之——讀薛龍春《雅宜山色:王寵的人生與書法》[J];中國書畫;2013年04期

3 薛龍春;;薛龍春書家作品欣賞[J];七彩語文(寫字);2013年06期

4 ;《書法交流四人展》筆談[J];書法之友;1999年06期

5 莫言;;眾家評說當(dāng)下書壇[J];書法藝術(shù);1998年04期

6 ;資訊[J];中國書畫;2005年05期

7 鄭付忠;;再談晚明“奇字”現(xiàn)象——以王鐸、傅山為例[J];書法賞評;2014年01期

8 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：2336433