本文選題：文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品 + 價(jià)值共創(chuàng)��； 參考：《東華大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)國(guó)際化的背景下,文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)已經(jīng)成為衡量一個(gè)國(guó)家實(shí)力的重要標(biāo)志。我國(guó)也將文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)作為戰(zhàn)略新興產(chǎn)業(yè)加以大力扶持和發(fā)展。為了應(yīng)對(duì)消費(fèi)市場(chǎng)需求的提升,各種有形無(wú)形的文化創(chuàng)意商品也日趨多樣化,加上媒體科技與政治經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,使得文化產(chǎn)品內(nèi)涵價(jià)值構(gòu)成與挖掘成為熱點(diǎn)研究問(wèn)題之一。在新的信息技術(shù)、消費(fèi)需求不斷演變的環(huán)境下,如何挖掘文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品顯性價(jià)值與隱性價(jià)值,明確文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值的影響因素與關(guān)鍵增值因素,協(xié)調(diào)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品相關(guān)人員在價(jià)值創(chuàng)造過(guò)中的關(guān)系與作用,都對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值管理研究提出了新的挑戰(zhàn)。本研究從文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)的共創(chuàng)管理角度著手,聚焦創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的價(jià)值結(jié)構(gòu)與層次,旨在通過(guò)分析文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值模式,挖掘其特有的增值機(jī)理。通過(guò)構(gòu)建文化創(chuàng)意設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)和銷售企業(yè)間的非合作博弈模型,確定雙方在達(dá)到博弈均衡時(shí)的最優(yōu)利潤(rùn)決策,同時(shí)通過(guò)合作博弈模型,分析設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)和銷售企業(yè)實(shí)現(xiàn)價(jià)值增值過(guò)程中的各自價(jià)值貢獻(xiàn)和收益分配,并對(duì)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)及其企業(yè)主體競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的形成與合作傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)。通過(guò)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)提煉出文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值內(nèi)外部影響因素,獲得價(jià)值增值特征,從而揭示文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值演化規(guī)律和特有增值維度,探尋有利于價(jià)值增值的干預(yù)靶點(diǎn),提出文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)管理的優(yōu)化策略。通過(guò)研究,為文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的商業(yè)實(shí)踐管理提供理論依據(jù),為提升創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品相關(guān)者的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)能力、改善組織績(jī)效提供科學(xué)的實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)。主要研究?jī)?nèi)容及結(jié)果:第一,提煉基于價(jià)值鏈的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值形成基本理論及價(jià)值共創(chuàng)路徑。文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值形成的影響因素包括外部環(huán)境價(jià)值系統(tǒng)和內(nèi)在產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈價(jià)值系統(tǒng),并通過(guò)四種途徑驅(qū)動(dòng)(終端消費(fèi)者合作、設(shè)計(jì)創(chuàng)作、生產(chǎn)合作和渠道合作)實(shí)現(xiàn)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)。文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)包含其價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的外部環(huán)境價(jià)值系統(tǒng)(政府政策規(guī)劃、科技發(fā)展水平、宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)以及社會(huì)公眾的認(rèn)知等)、內(nèi)在產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈價(jià)值系統(tǒng)(包括生產(chǎn)與研發(fā)的上游供應(yīng)商環(huán)節(jié)、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與合作的戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟、文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)與供給的文化創(chuàng)意企業(yè)、到達(dá)消費(fèi)者的營(yíng)銷渠道體系)、終端消費(fèi)者價(jià)值系統(tǒng)(包含接受文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品與服務(wù)的個(gè)體或家庭消費(fèi)者、產(chǎn)業(yè)組織客戶)。在影響因素分析的基礎(chǔ)上,將基于價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)途徑劃分為四類:終端消費(fèi)者合作驅(qū)動(dòng)的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)、設(shè)計(jì)創(chuàng)作重構(gòu)驅(qū)動(dòng)的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)、生產(chǎn)合作驅(qū)動(dòng)的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)和渠道合作驅(qū)動(dòng)的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)。第二,構(gòu)建文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品主體間價(jià)值形成的博弈模型。分析了政府監(jiān)管部門(mén)、文化創(chuàng)意企業(yè)、消費(fèi)者等價(jià)值共創(chuàng)主體間存在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)合作博弈關(guān)系。以文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值鏈上的設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)和分銷企業(yè)間價(jià)值共創(chuàng)為背景,建立了非合作博弈下設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)和分銷企業(yè)間的nash博弈模型和stackelberg博弈模型,分析了均衡解;并進(jìn)一步建立了兩類企業(yè)的合作博弈模型,通過(guò)合作博弈下最優(yōu)利潤(rùn)的求解,對(duì)非合作與合作博弈下價(jià)值共創(chuàng)效果進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。結(jié)果表明,在非合作競(jìng)爭(zhēng)博弈下,當(dāng)達(dá)到博弈均衡時(shí),使得價(jià)值增值的各企業(yè)的價(jià)值投入在stackelberg博弈下要高于nash博弈下的投入,其最優(yōu)的價(jià)值投入實(shí)現(xiàn)的是自身利潤(rùn)最大化,這樣雖然各自環(huán)節(jié)上實(shí)現(xiàn)了價(jià)值增值,但不是整體價(jià)值鏈上的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)。在合作博弈模式下,文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)與分銷企業(yè)亦實(shí)現(xiàn)的是價(jià)值鏈系統(tǒng)總利潤(rùn)的增值。而且,相比nash非合作博弈,雖然各主體的價(jià)值投入更多了,但總收益也提高了;相比stackelberg非合作博弈,其各自的價(jià)值投入不均衡,此時(shí)通過(guò)合作也實(shí)現(xiàn)了價(jià)值共創(chuàng),價(jià)值鏈上的整體利潤(rùn)增加,但由于雙方價(jià)值投入的差異,各自的利潤(rùn)相比非合作競(jìng)爭(zhēng)博弈情形不一定是最優(yōu)的。第三,對(duì)企業(yè)價(jià)值供給——消費(fèi)者導(dǎo)向的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效的影響因素進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究。首先分析企業(yè)與消費(fèi)者在文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)中的作用,以及企業(yè)價(jià)值供給與消費(fèi)者導(dǎo)向的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值影響因素,并提煉出關(guān)鍵價(jià)值影響因素。提出企業(yè)價(jià)值供給與消費(fèi)者導(dǎo)向的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效影響的假設(shè)條件,通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)研和信度效度檢驗(yàn)等實(shí)證方法,得到實(shí)證結(jié)果,包括:第一,在價(jià)值供給對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效的影響中,文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品功能價(jià)值對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效沒(méi)有顯著的正向影響;體驗(yàn)價(jià)值對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效有顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系,信息價(jià)值對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效沒(méi)有顯著的直接正相關(guān)關(guān)系。第二,在價(jià)值供給對(duì)消費(fèi)者價(jià)值感知和價(jià)值增值的影響中,功能價(jià)值、體驗(yàn)價(jià)值、信息價(jià)值均對(duì)消費(fèi)者價(jià)值感知具有顯著的正向影響。第三,在消費(fèi)者價(jià)值感知對(duì)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)績(jī)效的影響中,消費(fèi)者價(jià)值感知對(duì)共同制定創(chuàng)意計(jì)劃、共同解決和實(shí)施價(jià)值共創(chuàng)具有顯著的正向影響。本研究具有重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。在理論上,本文分析文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值提升與共創(chuàng)涉及的主體,探索主體之間的價(jià)值資源整合和互動(dòng)機(jī)理,理順價(jià)值共創(chuàng)的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑,尋找其價(jià)值共創(chuàng)管理的最優(yōu)方式。對(duì)于充實(shí)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增值形成與共創(chuàng)理論有著重要的理論意義。在實(shí)踐上,本文以文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品研發(fā)案例為數(shù)據(jù)收集對(duì)象,從消費(fèi)者需求和產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)雙向角度切入,將價(jià)值共創(chuàng)管理理論與思想注入文創(chuàng)產(chǎn)業(yè),科學(xué)合理的對(duì)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)管理等相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行剖析,有助于企業(yè)建立與市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)相適應(yīng)的價(jià)值提升指導(dǎo)策略,對(duì)我國(guó)文創(chuàng)產(chǎn)業(yè)提高競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,優(yōu)化產(chǎn)品價(jià)值結(jié)構(gòu)有著較強(qiáng)的實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)意義。本文研究的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)主要體現(xiàn)為:第一,將文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)和共創(chuàng)機(jī)制融入價(jià)值鏈理論體系,提練出文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)的幾個(gè)維度(文化價(jià)值、藝術(shù)價(jià)值、經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值和社會(huì)價(jià)值),從文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)的視角,構(gòu)建了文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)的整體框架模式,這對(duì)于刻畫(huà)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值形成和共創(chuàng)機(jī)理,具有研究視角上的創(chuàng)新性;第二,針對(duì)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)過(guò)程中相關(guān)企業(yè)之間的競(jìng)合特點(diǎn),基于博弈論方法構(gòu)建了創(chuàng)意設(shè)計(jì)企業(yè)與銷售企業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與合作博弈模型,從利潤(rùn)增值的視角分析了文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品博弈主體間合作博弈關(guān)系對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)總系統(tǒng)利潤(rùn)提升的影響,這對(duì)于揭示文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品基于競(jìng)合博弈關(guān)系的價(jià)值共創(chuàng)機(jī)理,不斷提升文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的共創(chuàng)價(jià)值,具有研究?jī)?nèi)容上的創(chuàng)新性;第三,從文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)主體之一的消費(fèi)者為強(qiáng)導(dǎo)向作用的視角,用實(shí)證方法構(gòu)建了企業(yè)—消費(fèi)者導(dǎo)向的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)模型,通過(guò)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)中各主體對(duì)價(jià)值共創(chuàng)的作用,特別是消費(fèi)者導(dǎo)向作用對(duì)文創(chuàng)企業(yè)價(jià)值創(chuàng)新的傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制,擴(kuò)展了文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)的研究?jī)?nèi)涵,具有研究?jī)?nèi)容上的創(chuàng)新性。
[Abstract]:In the context of economic globalization and competition internationalization, cultural and creative industries have become an important indicator of the strength of a country. Our country also supports and develops the cultural and creative industries as a new strategic industry. In order to cope with the promotion of consumer market demand, various intangible cultural and creative commodities are also increasingly diversified. With the development of media science and technology and political economy, the composition and mining of cultural products have become one of the hot research issues. In the environment of the continuous evolution of the new information technology and consumption demand, how to excavate the dominant and recessive values of cultural and creative products, and clarify the factors affecting the value of the literary creative products and the key value-added factors In order to coordinate the relationship and function of cultural and creative product related personnel in value creation, they all put forward new challenges to the research of value added management of traditional cultural and creative products. This study focuses on the value structure and level of creative products from the perspective of the growth of cultural and creative products, and aims to analyze cultural creation by analyzing culture. Through the construction of the non cooperative game model between the cultural creative design enterprise and the sales enterprise, the optimal profit decision is determined by the two parties to achieve the equilibrium of the game. At the same time, the respective prices of the design enterprises and the sales enterprises in the process of value increment are analyzed by the cooperative game model. Value contribution and income distribution, and the empirical test of the formation and cooperation mechanism of the value creation of cultural and creative products and the formation of the competitive power of enterprises and the cooperation mechanism of cooperation. Special value added dimension, exploring the target of value added intervention, and putting forward the optimization strategy of the value creation management of cultural and creative products. Through the research, it provides the theoretical basis for the commercial practice management of cultural creative products, and provides scientific practical guidance for improving the value creation ability of creative product related people and improving the organization performance. The research contents and results are as follows: firstly, the basic theory and value creation path of cultural and creative product value based on value chain are extracted. The influence factors of the formation of cultural creative product value include the external environment value system and the intrinsic industrial chain value system, and drive through four ways (terminal consumer cooperation, design creation, production cooperation) The value creation of cultural and creative products includes the value created external environmental value system (government policy planning, technology development level, macro economic situation and public awareness, etc.), internal chain value system (including the upstream supplier link of production and research and development, competition and cooperation) Strategic alliance, cultural and creative products producing and supplying cultural creative enterprises, reaching the marketing channel system of consumers, terminal consumer value system (including individual or family consumers receiving cultural and creative products and services, industrial organization customers). Based on the analysis of influencing factors, the cultural and creative products are based on the growth of value. The way of value creation is divided into four categories: value creation driven by terminal consumer cooperation, value creation driven by design creation reconfiguration, value creation driven by production cooperation and value creation driven by channel cooperation. Second, a game model for the formation of the value of cultural and creative products between subjects is constructed. The government supervision department and cultural creative enterprises are analyzed. In the context of the value creation between design enterprises and distribution enterprises in the value chain of cultural creative products, the Nash game model and Stackelberg game model between the design enterprise and the distribution enterprise under the non cooperative game are established, and the equilibrium solution is analyzed. The cooperative game model of the two types of enterprises, through the solution of the optimal profit under the cooperative game, compares the value creation effect of the non cooperative and cooperative game. The result shows that, under the non cooperative competition game, when the game equilibrium is reached, the value input of the value added enterprises in the Stackelberg game is higher than that of the Nash Bo. The best value input realizes the maximization of its own profit, so that although the value increment is realized in each link, it is not the value creation on the whole value chain. In the cooperative game model, the cultural creative product design enterprise and the distribution enterprise also realize the value increment of the total profit of the value chain system. Moreover, compared with the n Ash non cooperative game, although the value of each subject is more invested, but the total income is also improved; compared with the non cooperative game of Stackelberg, its respective value input is not balanced. At this time, the value chain is created by cooperation, and the overall profit on the value chain is increased, but the profit of the two parties is not cooperated because of the difference in the value input of the two parties. The competition game situation is not necessarily the best. Third, the empirical study on the influence factors of enterprise value supply - consumer oriented cultural and creative product value creation performance is carried out. First, the role of enterprises and consumers in the creation of cultural and creative products value, and the cultural and creative production of the enterprise value supply and consumer orientation are also analyzed. The influence factors of value added and key factors are extracted. The hypothesis conditions of the impact of value supply and consumer oriented value creation are proposed. The empirical results are obtained through questionnaire survey and reliability and validity test, including: first, cultural creativity in the impact of value supply on value creation performance Product functional value has no significant positive impact on value creation performance; experience value has significant positive correlation with value creation performance, and there is no significant direct correlation between information value and value creation performance. Second, in the influence of value supply on consumer value perception and value added, function value, experience value, The value of information has a significant positive impact on the perceived value of consumer value. Third, in the impact of consumer value perception on the value creation performance of cultural and creative products, consumer value perception has a significant positive impact on the joint formulation of creative plans and the common solution and implementation of value creation. This study has important theoretical significance and In theory, in theory, this paper analyzes the subjects involved in the promotion and creation of the value of cultural and creative products, explores the integration and interaction mechanism of value resources between the subjects, straightens out the realization path of value creation, and seeks the best way of its value creation management. It emphasizes the theory of enriching the value added formation and creating theory of cultural creative products. In practice, in practice, this article takes the case of cultural and creative product research and development as the data collection object, from the two-way angle of consumer demand and product production, the theory and thought of value creation management into the creation industry, scientific and rational management of the value co creation of cultural and creative products and other related issues, which will help the enterprise. The establishment of value promotion guidance strategy adapted to market competition has a strong practical guiding significance for improving competitiveness and optimizing product value structure in Chinese culture industry. The innovation and academic contribution of this paper are mainly embodied in the following aspects: first, the value increase and creation mechanism of cultural and creative products are integrated into the value chain theory system, and the practice is put forward. Several dimensions (cultural value, artistic value, economic value and social value) of the value growth of cultural and creative products (cultural value, artistic value, economic value and social value), from the perspective of the value growth of cultural and creative products, the overall framework model of the value creation of cultural creative products is constructed, which is an innovation in the perspective of the study of the formation and creation mechanism of cultural and creative products. Second, based on the game theory, a game model of competition and cooperation between creative design enterprises and sales enterprises is built on the basis of game theory. From the perspective of profit appreciation, the cooperative game relationship between the players of cultural creative products is analyzed and the total system profit of value creation is analyzed. The influence of the promotion is to reveal the value creation mechanism of the cultural and creative products based on the competing game relationship, constantly improve the creation value of the cultural creative products, and have the innovation in the research content. Third, from the perspective of the strong guiding role of the consumers of the creation of the value of the value of cultural and creative products, the enterprise has constructed the enterprise by empirical method. The value creation model of the consumer oriented cultural and creative products, through the empirical test of the role of the various subjects in the value creation of cultural creative products, especially the transmission mechanism of the consumer oriented role on the value innovation of the enterprise, has expanded the research connotation of the value creation of cultural creative products, and has the creation of the research content. New nature.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何春華;;美國(guó)創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易發(fā)展研究及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

2 曹星;;成都創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品初探[J];藝術(shù)與設(shè)計(jì)(理論);2010年08期

3 龐建剛;周彬;劉志迎;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的定價(jià)策略研究[J];軟科學(xué);2012年08期

4 高長(zhǎng)春;李紅;章超斌;;中日韓創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易發(fā)展及國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力比較研究[J];價(jià)格月刊;2012年11期

5 曲如曉;董程;;中國(guó)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易特點(diǎn)及發(fā)展對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2012年10期

6 林明華;楊永忠;;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品:文化、技術(shù)與經(jīng)濟(jì)的融合物[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2013年07期

7 卓俏青;;中印文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易的互補(bǔ)性與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性分析[J];現(xiàn)代傳播(中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2014年07期

8 魏鵬舉;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的屬性與特征[J];文化月刊;2010年08期

9 魏鵬舉;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的屬性與特征[J];西江月;2010年20期

10 李世忠;;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的價(jià)值特點(diǎn)[J];美苑;2009年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 白遠(yuǎn);;從文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品國(guó)際貿(mào)易的比較論中國(guó)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的消費(fèi)[A];論北京文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展——2009北京文化論壇文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 馮其予 實(shí)習(xí)生 王鑫 莊婷;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品迎來(lái)春天[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 本報(bào)記者 劉仁;做創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的孵化器[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2013年

3 黃玉迎;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品出口 中國(guó)排世界第三[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

4 孫芳華邋記者 尹訓(xùn)寧;中國(guó)成為創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)第三大主要出口國(guó)[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2007年

5 記者 高建進(jìn);去年中國(guó)創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品出口全球第一[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

6 商報(bào)記者 藍(lán)有林;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品引領(lǐng)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈延伸[N];中國(guó)圖書(shū)商報(bào);2013年

7 本報(bào)記者 徐瀟;博物館“賣(mài)萌”成為潮流 文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品漸受關(guān)注[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

8 滬特;中國(guó)成為創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)的第三大出口國(guó)[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2006年

9 金燦;“影響世界十大創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品”研究成果出爐[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2008年

10 本報(bào)記者 劉平;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品與資本對(duì)接[N];天津日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉曉東;基于價(jià)值增長(zhǎng)機(jī)制的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值共創(chuàng)研究[D];東華大學(xué);2017年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 武源;卡通風(fēng)格文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 趙安莉;數(shù)字化時(shí)代手繪藝術(shù)在文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品中的應(yīng)用研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

3 王強(qiáng);某高校創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息平臺(tái)設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];電子科技大學(xué);2015年

4 黃文地;達(dá)斡爾族、滿族傳統(tǒng)材料在文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)中的應(yīng)用[D];齊齊哈爾大學(xué);2015年

5 江洋洋;高校校園文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品的營(yíng)銷傳播研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

6 楊秋紅;圖形設(shè)計(jì)在蘇州文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品中的應(yīng)用與研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

7 張雪瑩;陜州傳統(tǒng)民俗在文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)中的研究與應(yīng)用[D];中原工學(xué)院;2016年

8 雷云霄;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品價(jià)值評(píng)估研究[D];云南大學(xué);2016年

9 郭玉萍;校園文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2016年

10 周琳瑯;基于情境整合的文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)品設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1803090