語(yǔ)義問(wèn)題一直是傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)（CCL）和后認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)（NCL）的分水嶺。傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)認(rèn)為語(yǔ)言形式的存在是獨(dú)立于意義，和意義無(wú)關(guān)，因此語(yǔ)言研究就是分析句法；而后認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)在語(yǔ)言研究過(guò)程中把對(duì)意義的研究視為不可或缺的中心話題。這一轉(zhuǎn)變也體現(xiàn)了后認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的主要特征。在認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)領(lǐng)域，存在諸多的語(yǔ)義構(gòu)建觀點(diǎn)和理論，如認(rèn)知語(yǔ)法、隱喻理論、理想認(rèn)知模式、合成理論等；這些理論都試圖從不同的視角論述語(yǔ)義現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的機(jī)理。然而到目前為止，還沒(méi)有文獻(xiàn)表明語(yǔ)義概念的研究采用過(guò)本研究所用的研究方法，也沒(méi)有文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道過(guò)以往的研究曾有把不同學(xué)科中的某些研究方法用于Dao（道/way）的多義性及其拓展的研究。本論文總的指導(dǎo)理念是人類擁有同一的認(rèn)知。在此基礎(chǔ)上，從理論和經(jīng)驗(yàn)出發(fā)，對(duì)語(yǔ)義，特別是對(duì)英、漢語(yǔ)Dao（道/way）的多義性及其拓展的語(yǔ)義概念形成進(jìn)行了研究，通過(guò)對(duì)中、英文對(duì)應(yīng)概念的語(yǔ)言表示方式翔實(shí)語(yǔ)料的分析，了解多義詞的諸多概念與其他認(rèn)知系統(tǒng)的關(guān)系。本研究的主要特點(diǎn)在于其體現(xiàn)了認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究的多學(xué)科性，具體地說(shuō)，以心理學(xué)的格式塔理論，實(shí)證哲學(xué)中的圖式理論，以及認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的重組和再生理論為核心建立的體現(xiàn)人類基本... 

【文章來(lái)源】：上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：173 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
摘要
Abstract
List of Figures
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
    1.1 Focus of the research
    1.2 The materials and methods of the Research
    1.3 The hypotheses of the research
    1.4 Organization of the individual chapters
CHAPTER 2 CLASSICAL COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (CCL) vs. NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
    2.1 Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
        2.1.1 Background of Chomsky’s Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
        2.1.2 Chomsky’s fundamental assumptions under Western objectivism
        2.1.3 General problems with CCL
            2.1.3.1 Problems with Chomsky’s Core constructions
            2.1.3.2 Problems with Chomsky’s Transitivity
            2.1.3.3 Problems with Chomsky’s Compositional Semantics
    2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
        2.2.1 The assumption of NCL on language
        2.2.2 Symbolic nature of language from NCL perspectives
        2.2.3 NCL view of grammar
        2.2.4 NCL embodied view of language
        2.2.5 NCL view on the function of language
        2.2.6 NCL view of constraints on language
    2.3 Summary
CHAPTER 3 G-S-R-E APPROACH TO SEMANTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POLYSEMY DAO (道/WAY) AND ITS EXTENSIONS
    3.1 Embodied mechanism of language
        3.1.1 Configurational structures of polysemy Dao (道/way) within G-S-R-E framework
            3.1.1.1 The overlap between four principles of perception and semantic conceptualization of spatial language
            3.1.1.2 The overlap between the construal of Figure - Ground and semantic conceptualization of language
        3.1.2 Schema’s contribution to the general principle of meaningfulness within G-S-R-E framework
            3.1.2.1 Schematic principle of organizing semantic conceptualization
            3.1.2.2 Comparison and contrast of schema and Formalist rules
            3.1.2.3 Schemas of Dao (道/way) at different levels of organization
        3.1.3 Access to categorization: another cognitive ability relative to semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions
        3.1.4 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of Metonymy and metaphor
            3.1.4.1 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of metonymy
            3.1.4.2 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy in terms of metaphor
        3.1.5 Summary
    3.2 Non-linguistic and cognitive semantics
        3.2.1 Traditional view of meaning: meaning in words alone
        3.2.2 NCL view of meaning
            3.2.2.1. Meaning in interaction with our bodies
            3.2.2.2 Conceptualization central to NCL
            3.2.2.3 Composite meaning of NCL
            3.2.2.4. Economy of language
        3.2.3 The content and construal for semantic conceptualization
            3.2.3.1 The content and construal
            3.2.3.2 The content
            3.2.3.3 The construal
        3.2.4 Summary
    3.3 Elaborate networks of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions within G- S-R-E framework
        3.3.1 Meaning construction and Dynamicity
            3.3.1.1 Concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/行）
            3.3.1.2 Mechanism of concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/ 行）
        3.3.2. Concept and mechanism of time in terms of motion way/go/move (道/路/走)
            3.3.2.1 Concept Time in terms of motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
            3.3.2.2 Mechanism of concept time through motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
        3.3.3 Concepts right, wrong, behavior, or morality in terms of way/path (道/路)
        3.3.4 Hierarchical embedding in the morphological and semantic extension of within the polysemy Dao (道/way)
            3.3.4.1 Cognitive organizing systems in the extension of polysemy Dao（Way/道）
            3.3.4.2 Productivity in the polysemous extension through due to topological characteristic of language
            3.3.4.3 Pattern of recombination and emergency of polysemy Dao (道/Way) and its extensions
        3.3.5 Summary
CHAPTER 4 IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE STUDIES
    4.1 Implications of the study
        4.1.1. Implications for the study of semantic conceptualization
        4.1.2. Implications for language
        4.1.3. Implications for philosophy
    4.2 Conclusions
    4.3 Future studies
Bibliography
Appendix: Polysemous meanings of Day (道/Way)



本文編號(hào)：3409358