本文選題：名詞動(dòng)化 + 特征��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：名詞動(dòng)化現(xiàn)象無(wú)處不在,報(bào)紙上、文學(xué)作品中,還有人們的日常生活中都可以遇到。許多國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者都關(guān)注于此語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象。該文旨在將英漢中的名詞動(dòng)化現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,主要從其特征和認(rèn)知機(jī)制兩個(gè)方面來(lái)探討此語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象。該文對(duì)名詞動(dòng)化現(xiàn)象給予闡述舉例,回顧國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)此的研究,將英漢名詞動(dòng)化進(jìn)行多維對(duì)比,最后得出結(jié)論。此外,該文在前面學(xué)者研究的基礎(chǔ)上為該對(duì)比設(shè)計(jì)和歸納了新的名詞動(dòng)化的分類。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),英漢名詞動(dòng)化在生成機(jī)制上有很大的相似性。首先,英漢的名詞動(dòng)化在特征比較上有相同、類似及其不同之分,有類似的使用特征,有完全一致的語(yǔ)用效果；其次,英語(yǔ)和漢語(yǔ)的名詞動(dòng)化離不開(kāi)隱喻和轉(zhuǎn)喻機(jī)制；而且,盡管在特征分析方面對(duì)其有不同的分類,但研究發(fā)現(xiàn),英語(yǔ)和漢語(yǔ)中的名詞動(dòng)化認(rèn)知機(jī)制基本一致；再者,在數(shù)據(jù)收集和分析的過(guò)程中,發(fā)現(xiàn)英語(yǔ)和漢語(yǔ)中的名詞動(dòng)化詞類分布存在差異；最后,轉(zhuǎn)喻和隱喻互為一體,在名詞動(dòng)化的認(rèn)知理解過(guò)程中相互作用,僅僅涉及轉(zhuǎn)喻機(jī)制的名詞動(dòng)化是存在的,但僅僅涉及隱喻機(jī)制的名詞動(dòng)化是不存在的,必須同時(shí)依賴轉(zhuǎn)喻機(jī)制。英漢名詞動(dòng)化機(jī)制的研究同樣也對(duì)文化交際、語(yǔ)言習(xí)得、翻譯等其他領(lǐng)域以一定的啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:Noun movement is everywhere, in newspapers, literature, and people's daily life can be encountered. Many scholars at home and abroad are concerned about this linguistic phenomenon. This paper aims to make a contrastive study of nominalization in English and Chinese, mainly from its characteristics and cognitive mechanisms. This paper gives an example of the phenomenon of noun activism, reviews the researches made by scholars at home and abroad, makes a multi-dimensional comparison between English and Chinese nouns, and finally draws a conclusion. In addition, this paper designs and induces a new classification of nominalization on the basis of the previous research. It is found that there is a great similarity in the generative mechanism between English and Chinese nouns. First of all, the nominalization in English and Chinese has the same features, similar and different, similar use characteristics, and completely consistent pragmatic effect; secondly, the nominalization of English and Chinese is inseparable from metaphor and metonymy; moreover, the noun motility in English and Chinese can not be separated from the mechanism of metaphor and metonymy. Although there are different classification in feature analysis, it is found that the cognitive mechanism of noun motility in English and Chinese is basically the same; moreover, in the process of data collection and analysis, It is found that there are differences in the distribution of nominalized parts of speech between English and Chinese. Finally, metonymy and metaphor interact with each other in the cognitive understanding of nominalization, which only involves the nominalization of metonymy. However, nominalization involving only metaphorical mechanisms does not exist and must depend on metonymy at the same time. The research on the mechanism of noun movement in English and Chinese is also instructive to other fields such as cultural communication, language acquisition, translation and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H314;H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王薇;楊寧寧;;現(xiàn)代英漢語(yǔ)名詞動(dòng)用對(duì)比與異同探因[J];北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年08期

2 牛保義;名轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu)式中的功能代謝問(wèn)題研究[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2002年01期

3 徐盛桓;;論英語(yǔ)名-動(dòng)詞的轉(zhuǎn)化[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);1981年01期

4 周領(lǐng)順;李速立;;我國(guó)的英漢轉(zhuǎn)類詞研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2006年04期

5 周領(lǐng)順;英漢名—?jiǎng)愚D(zhuǎn)類詞對(duì)比研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2000年05期

6 高芳,徐盛桓;名動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)用語(yǔ)用推理的認(rèn)知策略[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2000年04期

7 徐盛桓;名動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)用與功能代謝[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2001年08期

8 周領(lǐng)順;名轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)詞變異的本與度[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2003年04期

9 高芳,徐盛桓;名動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)用與語(yǔ)用推理[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2000年02期

10 徐盛桓;名動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)用的語(yǔ)義基礎(chǔ)[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2001年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王冬梅;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)動(dòng)名互轉(zhuǎn)的認(rèn)知研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

2 王薇;名詞動(dòng)用的認(rèn)知修辭研究[D];上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789309