本文選題：轉(zhuǎn)折范疇　切入點(diǎn)：空間范疇　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來,范疇研究已經(jīng)成為漢語語法研究的熱點(diǎn)問題之一。轉(zhuǎn)折范疇是一種語義關(guān)系范疇,學(xué)界對具有轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)作用的副詞、轉(zhuǎn)折連詞及轉(zhuǎn)折復(fù)句等方面較為關(guān)注,但目前尚未見到從范疇角度對其進(jìn)行整體研究的論著。在這種背景下,本文試圖從歷時的角度盡可能地收錄能夠連接轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系句的關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記,進(jìn)而在原型范疇理論的指導(dǎo)下,根據(jù)其源詞的特征,建立起一個相對豐富的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇系統(tǒng)。 本文共分九章。 第一章是緒論部分,主要圍繞轉(zhuǎn)折范疇的基本內(nèi)涵、轉(zhuǎn)折范疇研究的意義、相關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀及尚存的問題、本文的研究范圍、采用的研究方法、語料選擇等六個方面展開。 第二章根據(jù)漢語史的分期,分別對上古、中古、近代三個時期出現(xiàn)的轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記進(jìn)行描寫。從整體上考察漢語史上轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記的產(chǎn)生、使用及興亡更替情況,從而為后文深入研究奠定基礎(chǔ)。 第三章至第七章討論轉(zhuǎn)折范疇的來源問題,本文從轉(zhuǎn)折范疇的來源角度進(jìn)行分類,依據(jù)源范疇的語義特征,探討不同的源范疇向轉(zhuǎn)折范疇轉(zhuǎn)化的時間、過程、動因和機(jī)制等問題。 第三章討論來源于空間范疇的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇,本文依據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)折的內(nèi)涵,認(rèn)為空間轉(zhuǎn)折范疇是轉(zhuǎn)折的原型范疇。本章將空間轉(zhuǎn)折范疇分為“前后返回”、“上下翻轉(zhuǎn)”、“原地回望”三類,并分別對其中的典型個案進(jìn)行研究,著重探討了“返”、“轉(zhuǎn)”、“反”、“倒”、“顧”等在漢語史上歷經(jīng)空間轉(zhuǎn)折范疇到關(guān)系轉(zhuǎn)折的歷時演變過程,演變的動因和機(jī)制等問題。不僅關(guān)注單個成員的語法化,而且對同類詞演變過程中的共相和殊相進(jìn)行探討。 第四章討論來源于心理行為范疇的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇,轉(zhuǎn)折句前后語義表達(dá)不一致,通常表現(xiàn)為否定結(jié)構(gòu)等形式。漢語史上部分心理行為動詞在與否定詞“不”或疑問詞“孰”、“誰”、“怎”、“那(哪)"、“豈”等結(jié)合后均發(fā)展出關(guān)聯(lián)用法。本章通過對“不料"、“不圖”“不想”、“誰知道”、“怎想”、“那(哪)曉得”等個案歷時演變過程的考察,歸納出其演變的共性,并解釋心理行為范疇與轉(zhuǎn)折范疇之間的關(guān)系。 第五章討論來源于限定范疇的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇。首先討論限定范圍副詞的轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)功能,從中可以看出兩個范疇之間的密切關(guān)系,繼而以個案考察的形式討論“但"、“只是”、“不過”、“就是”等從限定范疇進(jìn)入轉(zhuǎn)折范疇的時間、過程及演化的動因、機(jī)制等問題。 第六章討論來源于主觀確認(rèn)范疇的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇,主要以“其實(shí)"為例討論其歷史演變過程和轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)功能形成的原因。 第七章討論來源于順承關(guān)聯(lián)詞的轉(zhuǎn)折范疇,通過對“然”、“便”等個案的考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)古漢語中很多順承關(guān)聯(lián)詞兼有轉(zhuǎn)折連詞功能,這也揭示了轉(zhuǎn)折與順承之間具有非常緊密的語義關(guān)系。 第八章為轉(zhuǎn)折范疇跨語言考察,通過對漢語及世界其他語言中轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)詞的考察,著重揭示與轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)聯(lián)詞相關(guān)的具有共性的演變路徑,以佐證本文的觀點(diǎn)。 第九章是結(jié)語部分�？偨Y(jié)與漢語轉(zhuǎn)折范疇相關(guān)的演變路徑,轉(zhuǎn)折范疇產(chǎn)生的動因和機(jī)制等問題,對本文研究所得和有待繼續(xù)研究的課題進(jìn)行總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, research has become one of the hot issues in the study of Chinese grammar. Turning category is a semantic category, circles on a turning of the correlation function of adverbs, conjunctions and pays more attention to turning complexsentence etc., but has yet to see the overall research on it from the angle of the category of works. In this context, this article attempts from the diachronic point of view as much as possible to connect the included markers associated with turning sentence, and then in the prototype category theory, according to the characteristics of the source words, to establish a relatively rich turning category system.
This article is divided into nine chapters.
The first chapter is the introduction. It mainly focuses on the following six aspects: the basic connotation of the transitional category, the significance of the study of the transitional category, the related research status and the remaining problems, the research scope, the research methods and corpus selection.
The second chapter according to the stage of Chinese history, of ancient, medieval, modern transitional mark appears three times are described. The influences of adversative marker produced in Chinese history as a whole, and the rise and fall of turnover, so as to further study lay the foundation for the later.
From the third chapter to the seventh chapter, we discuss the source of transition category. This paper classifies from the source category of transition category, and explores the time, process, motivation and mechanism of transformation from different source categories to transitional categories based on the semantic features of source categories.
The third chapter discusses the turning from category space category, on the basis of turning the connotation of space turning category is the prototype of transition. This chapter will turn the space category is divided into before and after "return", "upside down", "standing back three, and studied the typical example, emphatically discussion on the" back "," turn "," anti "," Dao "," Gu "in Chinese history after turning into the category of relationship lasted space turning point in the evolution process, the evolution of reason and mechanism. Not only pay attention to individual members of the grammaticalization of similar words and universals in the process of evolution particulars are discussed.
The fourth chapter discusses the turning from psychological and behavioral category category, turning sentence before and after the semantic expression is not the same, usually negative structure. The history of Chinese psychological verbs on the behavior and negative word "no" or "or" interrogative "who", "what", "that (which)". "It" was developed with associated usage. This chapter of the "unexpectedly", "no" map "," who do not want to "know", "how to think", "the study (which) know" case diachronic evolution, summarizes its evolution characteristics, and explain the relationship between the category and the category of psychological turning behavior.
The fifth chapter discusses the scope of limited range from turning. Firstly, adversative adverbs function, can be seen from the close relationship between the two areas, and then to discuss the form of "case study", but "just", "but", "is" from the limited range into the turning time category motivation, process and evolution mechanism, and other issues.
The sixth chapter discusses the turning category derived from the category of subjective confirmation, mainly taking "actually" as an example to discuss the process of its historical evolution and the causes of the formation of the turning related functions.
The seventh chapter discusses the category of turning from continues conjunction, through the "ran", "investigation" in such cases, found in ancient Chinese, many sequence related words both conjunctions, it also reveals the turning point and the semantic relationship between is very close.
The eighth chapter is a cross language study of the transitional category. Through the investigation of transitional Related words in Chinese and other languages in the world, we highlight the common evolution paths related to transitional Related words, in order to corroborate this view.
The ninth chapter is the concluding part. It summarizes the evolution path related to Chinese turning categories, the motivation and mechanism of turning categories, and summarizes the research findings and issues to be further studied.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王月萍;;“可是”的語法化[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

2 張曉濤;鄒學(xué)慧;;“誰”特指問與否定的相通性研究[J];北方論叢;2011年03期

3 沈家煊;實(shí)詞虛化的機(jī)制──《演化而來的語法》評介[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);1998年03期

4 金春梅;“但”字小議[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報);2005年03期

5 藍(lán)鷹;從少數(shù)民族語言看“而”的虛化演變[J];古漢語研究;1990年01期

6 蔣紹愚;近十年間近代漢語研究的回顧與前瞻[J];古漢語研究;1998年04期

7 王建軍;;粘合·移位·虛化·替換——語氣詞“便是”到“就是”的演化歷程[J];古漢語研究;2006年04期

8 金穎;張春秀;;《敦煌變文集》的“但”[J];古漢語研究;2007年03期

9 王霞;轉(zhuǎn)折連詞“不過”的來源及語法化過程[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

10 唐賢清;近代漢語副詞“逐旋”的演變[J];衡陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué));2003年04期

，

本文編號：1650425