本文選題：香港大會堂 + 禮查飯店�。� 參考：《當代電影》2017年02期

【摘要】：關于電影初到中國的歷史考察,此前學界主要關注的是以《申報》為主的中文報刊資料。然而,這對于由西方傳入并主要由外國商人所經營,同時又具有鮮明國際主義色彩的早期電影來說,是不夠的。若是將視野擴展到當時中國出版的外文報刊,或許能給我們提供一些更豐富的史料和更清晰的記載,尤其是通過中外文文獻資料的比對和辨析,有助于化解某些歷史疑點。本文主要通過梳理中國早期出版的英文報刊上的相關報道,對電影初到中國的一些相關論點及其論據(jù)進行史料補證和辨析,同時對早期的電影放映先驅及其放映活動進行了細致考察,從而試圖厘清電影在中國最初的傳播和放映情況,為中國早期電影的歷史圖景拾遺補闕。
[Abstract]:As for the historical investigation of the film's first arrival in China, the academic circles focused mainly on the Chinese newspaper and periodicals. However, this was not enough for the early films, which were introduced from the West and run mainly by foreign businessmen and had a distinctive internationalist color at the same time. If we extend our horizons to the foreign language newspapers and periodicals published in China at that time, we may be able to provide us with more abundant historical data and clearer records, especially through the comparison and discrimination of Chinese and foreign literature and materials, which will help to resolve some historical doubts. By combing the relevant reports in the English newspapers and periodicals published in the early days of China, this paper makes an analysis of some relevant arguments and arguments of the film's early arrival in China. At the same time, it makes a careful investigation on the forerunners of early film projection and their projection activities, so as to clarify the initial dissemination and projection of films in China, so as to make up for the historical picture of the early Chinese films.
【作者單位】： 中國傳媒大學;

【相似文獻】

相關重要報紙文章 前8條

1 本報通訊員 方市興;產權人辦“遺失補證”須親自到場[N];南京日報;2006年

2 何萬斗;淺議行政訴訟中被告的補證[N];人民法院報;2006年

3 何菊榮 李保定;論行政訴訟中的補證[N];人民法院報;2002年

4 鄭定淵　蔡寬元;浙江瑞安：利用視頻開通異地補證業(yè)務[N];人民公安報;2009年

5 尚非 曾奕雪;把握復查補證的關鍵環(huán)節(jié)[N];人民公安報;2005年

6 通訊員 劉蓓蕾;“先蓋房再補證”的潛規(guī)則行不通了[N];檢察日報;2013年

7 曹國海;機動車補牌補證縣區(qū)辦理[N];張掖日報;2008年

8 新華社記者 李勇 黃冠;我在房產局“領”到一張假房產證[N];新華每日電訊;2004年

，

本文編號：1851084