本論文旨在探討中美兩國關于中美貿(mào)易爭端的新聞評論文章在元話語資源使用方面的異同,以及元話語標記在建構和實現(xiàn)說服中的作用。為此,本研究基于Hyland（2005）的人際元話語模型,隨機搜集并檢驗了2018年1月至2019年3月期間在《中國日報》和《華盛頓郵報》上發(fā)表的60篇關于中美貿(mào)易爭端的新聞評論文章（其中30篇由美國作家撰寫,30篇由以英語作為外語的中國作者撰寫）,運用AntConc專業(yè)統(tǒng)計軟件考察庫中各類元話語資源的頻數(shù)差異,并采用卡方檢驗進一步證實這些差異是否顯著。本研究采用定量與定性相結合的研究方法�；贖yland（2005）的人際元話語模型,本研究考察了兩個語料庫中每一類元話語的頻率和分布情況。定量結果揭示了兩庫中元話語的使用的相似性和差異性。一方面,在中美語料庫中人際互動型元話語資源都遠多于文本交互型元話語資源。此外,在文本交互型元話語中,過渡標記的使用頻率在兩個語料庫中都是最高的,而框架標記和回指標記則在兩個語料庫中使用頻率最低。在人際互動型元話語中,模糊語在兩個語料庫中使用頻率均最高,而自稱語在兩個語料庫中使用頻率均最低。另一方面,在中美語料庫中某些元話語子類以及子類... 

【文章來源】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學廣東省

【文章頁數(shù)】：89 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One General Introduction
    1.1 Research topic
    1.2 Definition of opinion articles
    1.3 Rationale
    1.4 Organization of the thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Definitions and classifications of metadiscourse
        2.1.1 Definition of metadiscourse
        2.1.2 Classification of metadiscourse
    2.2 Previous studies on metadiscourse
        2.2.1 Previous studies on metadiscourse in academic texts
        2.2.2 Previous studies on metadiscourse in advertisements and business communications
        2.2.3 Previous studies on metadiscourse in newspaper discourse
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Hyland’s interpersonal model of metadiscourse
    3.2 Rhetorical means of persuasion
    3.3 Analytical framework of the present study
Chapter four Research Method
    4.1 Research questions
    4.2 Corpus data
    4.3 Analytical procedures
Chapter five Results and Analysis
    5.1 Frequency of metadiscourse in the two corpora and its causes
        5.1.1 Interactive metadiscourse in the two corpora
        5.1.2 Interactional metadiscourse in the two corpora
    5.2 Metadiscourse and three means of persuasion
        5.2.1 Logos:the rational appeal achieved by interactive metadiscourse
        5.2.2 Ethos:the credible appeal achieved by interactive and interactional metadiscourse
        5.2.3 Pathos:the affective appeal achieved by interactional metadiscourse
        5.2.4 Summary
    5.3 Factors influencing the choice of metadiscourse
        5.3.1 National culture
        5.3.2 Organizational culture
        5.3.3 Personal influence
Chapter six Conclusion
    6.1 Summary of major findings
    6.2 Implications
    6.3 Limitations of this study and suggestions for future research
References
Appendices
    Appendix A
    Appendix B
    Appendix C



本文編號：3060185