【摘要】： 自從山田孝雄(1950)提出了“陳述”這一概念,時(shí)枝誠(chéng)記(1950)提出了“詞”和“辭”的概念之后,日語(yǔ)研究界便開始從句子各成分的主客觀性出發(fā)對(duì)謂語(yǔ)及句子整體構(gòu)造進(jìn)行探索。在這些研究中,對(duì)助動(dòng)詞的主客觀性強(qiáng)弱的探討均是研究的重點(diǎn)。從這些研究中可以看出,助動(dòng)詞主客觀性的強(qiáng)弱決定了其轄域,而且對(duì)助動(dòng)詞轄域的把握又影響著對(duì)整個(gè)句子結(jié)構(gòu)和意思的理解。然而,到目前為止,針對(duì)助動(dòng)詞轄域的研究,最常被討論的是否定助動(dòng)詞“ない”的轄域,關(guān)于“ない”之外的助動(dòng)詞、包括復(fù)合助動(dòng)詞、如“だろう”、“なければならない”等的轄域的研究卻幾乎沒(méi)有。 因此,本文在前人情態(tài)論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)比構(gòu)成句子的各成分和謂語(yǔ)補(bǔ)助成分“(の)だろう”的主客觀性的強(qiáng)弱,對(duì)“(の)だろう”的轄域進(jìn)行了考察。考察結(jié)果如下: カラ原因節(jié)位于“だろう”的轄域之外,但卻位于“のだろう”的轄域之內(nèi)。除此之外,“だろう”的轄域和“のだろう”的轄域基本相同。但是由它們構(gòu)成的句子在結(jié)構(gòu)和意義上卻有著很大的不同。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)日語(yǔ)句子中各構(gòu)成成分,包括復(fù)句中各從屬節(jié)的主客觀性強(qiáng)弱的深入、細(xì)致的分析,更加系統(tǒng)、深入地探討了作為謂語(yǔ)補(bǔ)助成分的“(の)だろう”的轄域。希望此次考察有助于擴(kuò)大研究視野,從而促使今后對(duì)日語(yǔ)句子結(jié)構(gòu)的研究更加深入、細(xì)致,使之取得進(jìn)一步的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Since Hsiao-hsiung Yamada (1950) put forward the concept of "statement" and Shi Zhi Chengji (1950) put forward the concepts of "word" and "ci", The Japanese research circle begins to explore the predicate and the whole structure of the sentence from the subject and objectivity of each component of the sentence. In these studies, the discussion of the subjective objectivity of auxiliary verbs is the focus of the study. From these studies, it can be seen that the subjectivity and objectivity of auxiliary verbs determine the scope of auxiliary verbs, and the grasp of the scope of auxiliary verbs affects the understanding of the structure and meaning of the whole sentence. However, so far, the study of the scope of auxiliary verbs has been the most frequently discussed is the negation of the scope of the auxiliary verb "Yi", about auxiliary verbs other than "Yi", including compound auxiliary verbs, such as "Yi", However, there are few studies on the areas of jurisdiction. Therefore, on the basis of previous modal studies, this paper investigates the scope of the sentence by comparing the subjective and objective elements of the sentence and the predicate subsidy component. The results are as follows: the reason section is outside the jurisdiction, but within the domain. In addition, the scope of the system is basically the same as that of the one. However, the sentences composed of them are very different in structure and meaning. Based on the in-depth and detailed analysis of the subjective and objective strengths of the components in Japanese sentences, including the subordinate sections in complex sentences, this paper probes into the domain of "(/)", which is used as a predicate subsidy component. It is hoped that this investigation will help to broaden the field of vision, so as to promote the study of Japanese sentence structure in the future, so that it can make further development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：H36

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王彤;試論“ダロウ”所表達(dá)的判斷語(yǔ)氣的模糊性[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

2 王詩(shī)榮,李南征;試論日語(yǔ)題述句的陳述方式[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2004年01期

3 王詩(shī)榮,莫偉;試論日語(yǔ)無(wú)題句的陳述方式[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2004年06期

4 吳宏;形式名詞(の、こと)+だろぅ的結(jié)構(gòu)和意義[J];日語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1997年03期

5 王詩(shī)榮;關(guān)于“陳述方式”意義的探討[J];日語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)與研究;2000年03期

6 顧盤明;試析“■だろう”和“■の(ん)だろう”的相異性[J];日語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)與研究;2000年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2484257