學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)是學(xué)術(shù)研究與學(xué)術(shù)寫作的本質(zhì)特征之一。在本研究中,它特指學(xué)術(shù)寫作者對(duì)現(xiàn)有研究一個(gè)或多個(gè)方面的負(fù)面評(píng)價(jià)。雖然當(dāng)前已有不少學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)方面的研究,但是大多只關(guān)注學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)的策略維度。此外,關(guān)于中國(guó)英語專業(yè)研究生學(xué)術(shù)寫作中的批評(píng)特征,仍有待探索。因此,本研究試圖探討中國(guó)英語專業(yè)碩博研究生學(xué)位論文的總體批評(píng)特征,各自批評(píng)特征,以及碩博學(xué)位論文之間批評(píng)特征的不同之處。本文對(duì)陳新仁（2017）提出的分析框架略作修改從而將批評(píng)對(duì)象、批評(píng)內(nèi)容、批評(píng)強(qiáng)度、批評(píng)策略整合到一個(gè)框架中,從中國(guó)知網(wǎng)隨機(jī)抽取30篇碩士論文和30篇博士論文,主要采用基于語料庫(kù)的定量研究方法,并輔以對(duì)批評(píng)特征的定性分析來考察中國(guó)英語專業(yè)研究生學(xué)位論文的批評(píng)特征。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):首先,總體批評(píng)特征如下:在批評(píng)對(duì)象維度,對(duì)他人研究的批評(píng)占主導(dǎo)地位,這說明碩博研究生能夠?qū)⒆陨硌芯颗c他人研究相關(guān)聯(lián),通過對(duì)他人研究的批評(píng)建立自己的研究空間。在批評(píng)內(nèi)容維度,碩博研究生能較全面地對(duì)研究的各方面內(nèi)容展開學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)。在批評(píng)強(qiáng)度維度,碩博研究生傾向于中性和弱化的語氣,這說明碩博研究生在批評(píng)過程中展現(xiàn)出客觀、謹(jǐn)慎的特點(diǎn)。在批評(píng)策略維度,緩和面子威脅型策略比非緩和... 

【文章來源】：山東大學(xué)山東省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：107 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Statements of the Problems
    1.3 Purposes and Methods of the Study
    1.4 Significance of the Study
    1.5 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Definitions of the Key Terms
    2.2 Approaches to Academic Criticism
        2.2.1 Pragmatic Approaches to Academic Criticism
        2.2.2 Discourse Semantic Approaches to Academic Criticism
        2.2.3 Corpus Approaches to Academic Criticism
    2.3 Studies on Academic Criticism from Diverse Perspectives
        2.3.1 Academic Criticism in Different Academic Genres
        2.3.2 Academic Criticism in Different Cultural Backgrounds
        2.3.3 Academic Criticism in Different Disciplines
        2.3.4 Academic Criticism in Different Periods of Time
        2.3.5 Academic Criticism at Different Language Proficiency Levels
    2.4 Research Gaps and Research Questions
    2.5 Chapter Summary
Chapter Three Analytical Framework
    3.1 The Analytical Framework of Academic Criticism Proposed by Chen
    3.2 The Analytical Framework of Academic Criticism for the Present Study
        3.2.1 Targets of Criticism
        3.2.2 Contents of Criticism
        3.2.3 Intensities of Criticism
        3.2.4 Strategies of Criticism
    3.3 Chapter Summary
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 The Corpus
    4.2 The Tools
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Analysis
    4.5 Chapter Summary
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 Results of General Academic Criticism Features
        5.1.1 Targets of Criticism in General Academic Criticism Features
        5.1.2 Contents of Criticism in General Academic Criticism Features
        5.1.3 Intensities of Criticism in General Academic Criticism Features
        5.1.4 Strategies of Criticism in General Academic Criticism Features
    5.2 Results of Respective Academic Criticism Features
        5.2.1 Academic Criticism Features of Master's Theses
        5.2.2 Academic Criticism Features of Doctoral Dissertations
    5.3 The Differences of Academic Criticism Features in Master's Theses andDoctoral Dissertations
        5.3.1 The Differences of Targets of Criticism
        5.3.2 The Differences of Contents of Criticism
        5.3.3 The Differences of Intensities of Criticism
        5.3.4 The Differences of Strategies of Criticism
    5.4 Discussion
        5.4.1 General Academic Criticism Features
        5.4.2 Respective Academic Criticism Features
        5.4.3 Differences of Academic Criticism Features
    5.5 Chapter Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Summary of the Major Findings
    6.2 Implications of the Study
    6.3 Limitations of the Study
    6.4 Suggestions for Future Research
References
Appendix Ⅰ Information About Data
Appendix Ⅱ Annotation Scheme
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]中西學(xué)者學(xué)術(shù)論文特征性it評(píng)價(jià)型式與意義的對(duì)比研究[J]. 王冰昕,衛(wèi)乃興.  外語與外語教學(xué). 2018(06)
[2]期刊論文中學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)話語的對(duì)比研究[J]. 李夢(mèng)欣.  浙江外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2018(06)
[3]學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)話語的分析框架建構(gòu)——基于國(guó)際核心期刊論文的研究[J]. 陳新仁.  外語與外語教學(xué). 2017(06)
[4]學(xué)術(shù)英語中文際性句干的隱性評(píng)價(jià)特征研究[J]. 張樂.  解放軍外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2017(05)
[5]二語寫作學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)與面子修復(fù)[J]. 李夢(mèng)欣.  江蘇外語教學(xué)研究. 2014(02)
[6]英語學(xué)術(shù)書評(píng)的評(píng)價(jià)策略分析——評(píng)價(jià)理論之態(tài)度視角[J]. 藍(lán)小燕.  山東外語教學(xué). 2011(02)
[7]英語學(xué)術(shù)書籍短評(píng)的評(píng)價(jià)分析[J]. 廖福妹,尉立萍.  廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào). 2010(05)
[8]論語用平衡[J]. 陳新仁.  外語學(xué)刊. 2004(06)

博士論文
[1]英漢語言學(xué)書評(píng)語篇中的負(fù)面評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)比研究[D]. 布占廷.山東大學(xué) 2014



本文編號(hào)：3291563