權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移的發(fā)展路徑:一種比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-15 00:07
本文關(guān)鍵詞:權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移的發(fā)展路徑:一種比較研究 出處:《華中師范大學(xué)》2016年博士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移 權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移理論 權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移 德國(guó) 英國(guó) 美國(guó) 中國(guó) 中美關(guān)系 俄狄浦斯效應(yīng)
【摘要】:當(dāng)今世界正處于復(fù)雜的過(guò)渡之中,其中,美國(guó)世界霸權(quán)地位日漸式微,而新興力量中國(guó)成功崛起。在國(guó)際關(guān)系中,這通常被稱為權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,對(duì)于解決沖突和全球戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題的具有積極作用。雖然,中國(guó)明確聲明無(wú)意稱霸世界,并將繼續(xù)謀求和平發(fā)展道路,然而中國(guó)驚人的發(fā)展速度與迅速崛起之勢(shì)令美國(guó)產(chǎn)生威脅感。這一問(wèn)題倘若未能得到正確處理,將導(dǎo)致嚴(yán)重的全球性后果。由于目前世界尚處于權(quán)力過(guò)渡的早期階段,避免悲劇的發(fā)生為時(shí)不晚,因此,為規(guī)避全球性的爭(zhēng)霸戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),探尋權(quán)力實(shí)現(xiàn)和平轉(zhuǎn)移的方法尤為重要。本文旨在通過(guò)比較研究法分析權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,以探索更加清晰的權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移方式,彌補(bǔ)國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)研究的不足(英國(guó)學(xué)者卡爾稱之為“國(guó)際關(guān)系的核心困境”,即“和平轉(zhuǎn)移難題”)。為實(shí)現(xiàn)此目的,本文將重點(diǎn)研究自19世紀(jì)末以來(lái),尤其是1866年至1945年間,英國(guó)與美國(guó)之間的權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,分析潛在的可能性原因與轉(zhuǎn)移過(guò)程。歷史上,兩個(gè)國(guó)家首次和平式的權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,即衰落的霸主(英國(guó))與崛起的大國(guó)(美國(guó))之間并未發(fā)生戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),這種獨(dú)特的歷史事件極具分析研究?jī)r(jià)值。1891年至1914年間,英國(guó)與德國(guó)之間戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)式的權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,遭遇失敗并于第一次世界大戰(zhàn)時(shí)終止,這種戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)式權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移將作為一個(gè)對(duì)比,與美國(guó)和英國(guó)之間的權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移進(jìn)行比較分析。本研究將運(yùn)用過(guò)程追蹤、假設(shè)檢驗(yàn)以及穆爾的兩者間差別分析等比較分析工具,探索影響美國(guó)和英國(guó)之間的權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移與英國(guó)和德國(guó)之間的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)式權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移的主要因素。權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移的概念可能會(huì)使美國(guó)感受到中國(guó)的威脅,但本研究仍將在假設(shè)這種轉(zhuǎn)移是現(xiàn)實(shí)存在的條件下進(jìn)行分析。換言之,從經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、軍事、社會(huì)和軟實(shí)力的方面出發(fā),假設(shè)中國(guó)比美國(guó)發(fā)展得更好。繼而,通過(guò)上文所論及的兩種歷史轉(zhuǎn)移作為指導(dǎo),研究中國(guó)與美國(guó)之間的關(guān)系嬗變,從而提出防止美國(guó)與中國(guó)陷入霸權(quán)爭(zhēng)戰(zhàn)的策略,同時(shí)探討實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力和平轉(zhuǎn)移的可能性。
[Abstract]:Today the world is in a complex transition, in which the United States world hegemony is declining, while the new power China has successfully emerged. In international relations, this is usually called power transfer. Although China has clearly stated that it has no intention of dominating the world and will continue to pursue the path of peaceful development. Yet China's phenomenal pace of development and its rapid rise have created a sense of threat to the United States, if not properly addressed. As the world is still in the early stages of the transition of power, it is not too late to avoid tragedies and, therefore, to avoid a global war for hegemony. It is very important to explore the method of realizing the peaceful transfer of power. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the transfer of power through comparative research in order to explore a clearer way of peaceful transfer of power. To make up for the deficiency in the study of international relations (which the British scholar Karl called "the core dilemma of international relations", that is, "the difficult problem of peaceful transfer"). In order to achieve this goal, this paper will focus on the study since the end of 19th century. Especially between 1866 and 1945, the transfer of power between Britain and the United States, the analysis of the potential causes and transfer process. In history, the two countries peaceful transfer of power for the first time. There is no war between the declining hegemon (UK) and the rising power (USA). This unique historical event is of great analytical value. From 1891 to 1914. The warlike transfer of power between Britain and Germany, which failed and ended in the first World War, will be a contrast. A comparative analysis of the peaceful transfer of power between the United States and the United Kingdom is carried out. This study uses process tracking, hypothesis testing and Moore's analysis of the differences between the two. Explore the main factors affecting the peaceful transfer of power between the United States and Britain and the warlike transfer of power between Britain and Germany. The concept of power transfer may make the United States feel the threat of China. In other words, from the economic, political, military, social and soft power aspects, we assume that China has developed better than the United States. Under the guidance of the two historical transfers discussed above, this paper studies the evolution of the relationship between China and the United States, and puts forward some strategies to prevent the United States and China from falling into a hegemonic war. At the same time, explore the possibility of realizing the peaceful transfer of power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號(hào)】:D81
,
本文編號(hào):1425895
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/1425895.html
最近更新
教材專著