本文關(guān)鍵詞：戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接對(duì)崛起國(guó)家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗的影響研究　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 崛起國(guó)家 戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接 海權(quán) 系統(tǒng)能量傳送力

【摘要】：本文的研究主題來(lái)源于現(xiàn)實(shí)情況與歷史問(wèn)題相結(jié)合所導(dǎo)致的困惑。一方面,當(dāng)下中國(guó)自提出"一帶一路"倡議后,積極構(gòu)建與一些重要國(guó)家的戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接關(guān)系,同時(shí)作為崛起大國(guó),中國(guó)的海權(quán)事業(yè)也在蓬勃發(fā)展,那么在復(fù)雜的國(guó)際環(huán)境下,中國(guó)對(duì)外構(gòu)建戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接的行為對(duì)海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展會(huì)起到推動(dòng)作用還是阻礙作用?另一方面,為什么在19世紀(jì)末至第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間,美國(guó)和德國(guó)作為崛起國(guó)家都在發(fā)展海權(quán),且這種行為都挑戰(zhàn)了英國(guó)的海洋霸主地位,但是最終美國(guó)勝利了而德國(guó)卻失敗了?基于上述困惑,并結(jié)合當(dāng)下時(shí)事,本文采用了一個(gè)新的角度,即從戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接的視角來(lái)研究海權(quán)。因此,本文要研究的核心問(wèn)題是:國(guó)家間構(gòu)建的戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接如何影響崛起國(guó)家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗?并進(jìn)一步提出了本文的核心假設(shè):不同戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接的選擇會(huì)通過(guò)系統(tǒng)能量傳送力影響崛起國(guó)家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗。本文的核心觀點(diǎn)是:建立戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接的兩國(guó)作為國(guó)際系統(tǒng)之下的子系統(tǒng),會(huì)在系統(tǒng)能量傳送力的作用下對(duì)其中一國(guó)內(nèi)部某一具體領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生影響。為了論證這一觀點(diǎn)及驗(yàn)證研究假設(shè),本文采用了詮釋法、模型分析法和案例法�；舅悸肥菍�(guó)家間建立的戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接關(guān)系視為國(guó)際系統(tǒng)之下的"子系統(tǒng)",它具有系統(tǒng)的屬性和功能,由兩個(gè)國(guó)家構(gòu)成,但真正起推動(dòng)作用的是國(guó)家內(nèi)部的各個(gè)發(fā)展領(lǐng)域。在本文中,國(guó)家被定義為一級(jí)單元,國(guó)內(nèi)的發(fā)展領(lǐng)域被定義為二級(jí)單元。本文研究的重點(diǎn)就是子系統(tǒng)與二級(jí)單元之間的關(guān)系。因此,本文中提出了一個(gè)重要概念,即"系統(tǒng)能量傳送力",它是連接子系統(tǒng)到二級(jí)單元之間的重要紐帶,是能量在系統(tǒng)內(nèi)進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)移和傳送的重要機(jī)制,它發(fā)揮作用·需要依托供需關(guān)系的平衡、戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接模式、戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接國(guó)和戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接領(lǐng)域的選擇。有了這一機(jī)制,就能夠解釋"子系統(tǒng)"是如何對(duì)二級(jí)單元的發(fā)展施加影響,從而為戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接對(duì)海權(quán)的影響提供解釋力。接下來(lái),本文采用了案例驗(yàn)證的方法,使用美國(guó)和德國(guó)海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗這一正一反兩個(gè)案例對(duì)研究假設(shè)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證。為了使兩個(gè)案例具有統(tǒng)一性,案例的時(shí)間范圍都控制在自1890年至1945年這長(zhǎng)達(dá)半個(gè)世紀(jì)的時(shí)間段內(nèi)。在經(jīng)過(guò)兩個(gè)歷史案例驗(yàn)證后,本文又以系統(tǒng)理論為指導(dǎo),對(duì)案例驗(yàn)證得出的基本結(jié)論進(jìn)行理論上的提煉和升華,進(jìn)而得出四點(diǎn)結(jié)論:第一,戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接建立與維持的基本原則是兩國(guó)供需關(guān)系的平衡;第二,戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接對(duì)海權(quán)的影響取決于對(duì)接模式、對(duì)接國(guó)和對(duì)接領(lǐng)域的選擇;第三,系統(tǒng)能量傳送力是戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接得以跨層次影響海權(quán)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵機(jī)制;第四,國(guó)家間體系與國(guó)家內(nèi)部發(fā)展領(lǐng)域之間存在雙向建構(gòu)關(guān)系。根據(jù)以上四點(diǎn)結(jié)論,本文給出的政策建議是:首先,中國(guó)在進(jìn)行戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接時(shí)必須要仔細(xì)權(quán)衡本國(guó)的戰(zhàn)略需求程度和戰(zhàn)略供給能力,避免"供需失衡"情況的出現(xiàn);其次,中國(guó)在構(gòu)建戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接時(shí)要基于本國(guó)海權(quán)等重點(diǎn)發(fā)展領(lǐng)域的需求,對(duì)戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接模式、戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接國(guó)和戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行慎重的選擇;最后,國(guó)家應(yīng)盡量建立海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的直接戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接,如果在其他領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行對(duì)接,也應(yīng)通過(guò)合理的規(guī)劃與調(diào)整,使在非海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接能夠起到反哺海權(quán)的作用。最終實(shí)現(xiàn)戰(zhàn)略對(duì)接與海權(quán)領(lǐng)域相互促進(jìn),協(xié)同發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The research topic of this article comes from the confusion caused by the combination of the reality and the historical problems. On the one hand, the current China since the introduction of The Belt and Road "initiative, and actively build the strategic docking relationship of some important countries, at the same time as a rising power, China sea power business is also booming, so in the complex international environment, the development of foreign Chinese constructing strategic docking behavior of sea power in the field of play to promote or hinder? On the other hand, why during the late nineteenth Century to the Second World War, the United States and Germany as emerging countries in the development of sea power, and this behavior have challenged the British marine hegemony, but the final victory of the United States and Germany failed? Based on the above problems, combined with the current current, this paper adopts a new angle, namely from a strategic perspective to study the docking of sea power. Therefore, the core issue of this article is: the national strategic docking construction how to influence the rise of state of sea power development success? And further puts forward the core hypothesis of the thesis: different strategic choice through the docking system of energy transfer effect rise of state of sea power development success. The core point of this paper is to establish a strategic docking of two countries as subsystems under the international system, which will have an impact on the development of one specific part of the domestic sector under the action of the system's energy transmission force. In order to prove this point of view and to verify the hypothesis, this paper adopts the interpretation method, the model analysis method and the case method. The basic idea is to regard the strategic docking relationship between countries as a sub system under the international system. It has system attributes and functions, consisting of two countries, but what really promotes is the various development fields within the country. In this article, the state is defined as a first level unit, and the development of the country is defined as a two level unit. The focus of this paper is the relationship between the subsystem and the two level unit. Therefore, this paper proposes an important concept, namely "energy transfer system", it is connected to the system and an important link between two units, is an important mechanism of energy transfer and transfer within the system, it can play a role, need to rely on the relationship of supply and demand balance, strategic docking mode, strategic docking in China and the choice of strategic docking. With this mechanism, it will be able to explain how the "subsystem" affects the development of the two level unit, thus providing an explanation for the impact of strategic docking on sea rights. Then, this paper uses a case study to verify the research hypothesis using the two cases of the success or failure of the development of the American and German sea rights. In order to make the two cases unified, the time range of the case is controlled in the half century period from 1890 to 1945. After two historical cases after verification, this paper is guided by the system theory, the basic conclusion of the case verify that the refining and sublimation of the theory, and then draw four conclusions: first, establish the basic principles and maintain strategic docking between the two countries is the relationship between supply and demand balance; second, strategic docking effect on sea power depending on the docking mode, docking and docking areas; third, the system energy transfer force is the key mechanism of strategic docking to influence the development of sea power and cross level; fourth, there is a two-way relationship between national construction system and national development within the area. According to the above four conclusions, policy recommendations in this paper are: first, China must carefully weigh their strategic docking strategy and strategic demand supply capacity, to avoid "the imbalance of supply and demand situation; secondly, China to based on their sea power needs of key development areas in the construction of strategic docking. By careful choice of strategic docking mode, strategic docking and strategic docking areas; finally, countries should try to establish a direct docking strategy of sea power field, if the docking in other areas, should be through the planning and reasonable adjustment, make strategic docking in the field of non sea power can play the role of nurturing sea power. The final realization of the strategic docking and the field of sea power to promote each other, coordinated development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D815
，

本文編號(hào)：1342305