本文選題：動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物 + 致害責(zé)任　； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文對(duì)動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害進(jìn)行了法律探究,希冀通過(guò)分析動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物范圍、歸責(zé)原則及適用等內(nèi)容,提出完善我國(guó)動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致人損害侵權(quán)責(zé)任問(wèn)題的相關(guān)建議,確�！肚謾�(quán)責(zé)任法》對(duì)于受害者的保護(hù)更為科學(xué)有力,也使得動(dòng)物園替代責(zé)任的承擔(dān)更為公平合理。本文探究動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致人損害侵權(quán)責(zé)任的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題如下:第一部分,主要闡述動(dòng)物、飼養(yǎng)的動(dòng)物、野生動(dòng)物、動(dòng)物園等相關(guān)研究對(duì)象的內(nèi)涵與法律地位,通過(guò)與飼養(yǎng)的動(dòng)物、野生動(dòng)物的定義與范圍的比較與區(qū)分,明確動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物的法律界定范圍及法律地位定性。第二部分,從侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則、侵權(quán)損害賠償、過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則等角度分析了動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)歸責(zé)的民法理念;同時(shí),從侵權(quán)歸責(zé)、理論基礎(chǔ)、價(jià)值目標(biāo)、法的功能體現(xiàn)等維度歸納出動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)歸責(zé)的法理淵源,以詳細(xì)、系統(tǒng)地分析動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定歸責(zé)原則的思想與理論淵源,并概括出動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)歸責(zé)所體現(xiàn)的法的制裁、預(yù)防、填補(bǔ)、保護(hù)等功能。第三部分,進(jìn)一步論述我國(guó)動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致人損害侵權(quán)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任原則下的構(gòu)成要件特征與具體構(gòu)要件、舉證責(zé)任特征與舉證內(nèi)容、抗辯事由及法定免責(zé)的具體情形、賠償范圍的一般與特殊情形等具體內(nèi)容。并且,聯(lián)系實(shí)際并結(jié)合現(xiàn)行具體案例,分析動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致人損害侵權(quán)責(zé)任承擔(dān)的法定免責(zé)事由與其它抗辯事由。第四部分,結(jié)合現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)范及司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀與不足,從立法規(guī)范及實(shí)務(wù)配套層面,通過(guò)明確動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物的定義與范圍、明晰動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)的責(zé)任主體的細(xì)分、構(gòu)建動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則多元化、建立健全如動(dòng)物園安全保障、商業(yè)保險(xiǎn)運(yùn)作配套、動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)救助基金等動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)責(zé)任保障機(jī)制等途徑探討并提出對(duì)動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致人損害侵權(quán)責(zé)任規(guī)制完善的措施與操作建議。最后,總結(jié)歸納全文,并立足于人與自然的和諧、可持續(xù)發(fā)展,呼吁社會(huì)關(guān)注并解決動(dòng)物園動(dòng)物致害侵權(quán)責(zé)任的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:This article has carried on the legal research to the zoo animal harm, hoped through the analysis zoo animal scope, the imputation principle and the application and so on content, proposed consummates our country zoo animal to cause the human harm the tort liability question related suggestion, To ensure that the Tort liability Act is more scientific and effective for the protection of victims, it also makes it more equitable and reasonable for zoos to take on alternative responsibilities. This paper explores the legal issues related to the liability of animal damage to human beings as follows: the first part mainly expounds the connotation and legal status of animals, animals, wildlife, zoos and other related research objects. By comparing and differentiating the definition and scope of animals and wild animals, the legal definition and legal status of zoo animals are defined. In the second part, from the angle of tort imputation principle, tort damage compensation, fault liability principle and so on, this paper analyzes the concept of civil law of tort liability for animal injury in zoos, at the same time, from the perspective of tort imputation, theoretical foundation, value target, etc. The functional embodiment of law and other dimensions induces the legal origin of the liability for animal injury infringement in zoos, and analyzes in detail the thought and theoretical origin of the principle of presumption of fault imputation for animal injury infringement in zoos. The functions of punishment, prevention, compensation, protection and so on are summarized. In the third part, the author further discusses the characteristics of constitutive elements and specific elements, the characteristics of burden of proof and the content of proof, the reasons of defense and the specific circumstances of legal exemption under the principle of presumption of fault liability for the infringement of human beings caused by animals in zoos in China. The scope of compensation in general and special circumstances and other specific content. In addition, combined with the actual situation and the current cases, this paper analyzes the legal exemption and other defenses of the liability for human damage caused by zoo animals. The fourth part, combined with the current legislative norms and the current situation and deficiencies of judicial practice, from the legislative norms and practical supporting level, through the clear definition and scope of zoo animals, to clarify the division of the main body of liability for animal harm infringement in zoos. The principle of liability for animal damage infringement should be diversified, such as zoo safety guarantee and commercial insurance operation. This paper discusses and puts forward some measures and operational suggestions on how to perfect the regulation of tort liability for animal damage caused by zoo animals, such as the zoo animal tort relief fund and other ways such as the safeguard mechanism of the zoo animal tort liability for the damage caused by the zoo animal. Finally, this paper summarizes the full text, and based on the harmony between man and nature, sustainable development, appeals to the community to pay attention to and solve the problem of animal tort liability in zoos.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜靖;異域的動(dòng)物保護(hù)[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2005年03期

2 ;“中國(guó)動(dòng)物保護(hù)法制國(guó)際研討會(huì)”召開(kāi)[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

3 鄭清賢;;為“正龍拍虎”不再成為新聞——淺談完善動(dòng)物保護(hù)法律的必要性[J];中國(guó)動(dòng)物檢疫;2009年12期

4 鄭清賢;;芻議完善我國(guó)動(dòng)物保護(hù)立法的可行性[J];中國(guó)動(dòng)物檢疫;2009年11期

5 王軍;李冰;;從動(dòng)物保護(hù)立法改變提法看我國(guó)動(dòng)物保護(hù)進(jìn)程[J];中國(guó)工作犬業(yè);2010年04期

6 ;女孩將6頭幼犬扔進(jìn)河里 動(dòng)物保護(hù)組織懸賞調(diào)查[J];中國(guó)工作犬業(yè);2010年10期

7 李思穎;;論動(dòng)物保護(hù)法是否該立[J];山西青年;2013年22期

8 鐘明;;形形色色的動(dòng)物保護(hù)法[J];科學(xué)之友(A版);2009年03期

9 曲輝;;動(dòng)物勞工,被忽視的福利[J];三月風(fēng);2010年08期

10 高興;;我們?yōu)槭裁匆拼齽?dòng)物[J];新民周刊;2012年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 伊?xí)钥?;我國(guó)動(dòng)物保護(hù)立法制度設(shè)計(jì)探討——以亞洲國(guó)家動(dòng)物保護(hù)立法為參考[A];生態(tài)文明的法制保障——2013年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2013年

2 臧瑩安;劉容珍;;創(chuàng)造更高層次的和諧—也談《中華人民共和國(guó)動(dòng)物保護(hù)法》的醞釀[A];中國(guó)畜牧獸醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)家畜內(nèi)科學(xué)分會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

3 徐學(xué)良;;試論動(dòng)物保護(hù)與利用[A];全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)：中國(guó)科技工作者的歷史責(zé)任——中國(guó)科協(xié)2003年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（上）[C];2003年

4 黃政;;動(dòng)物保護(hù)法律研究的新視角——多樣性[A];可持續(xù)發(fā)展·環(huán)境保護(hù)·防災(zāi)減災(zāi)——2012年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研究會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2012年

5 陳勇;孟顯慧;;淺析寵物動(dòng)物的福利及其保護(hù)[A];生態(tài)文明與環(huán)境資源法--2009年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2009年

6 康張婷;;淺談對(duì)民法典中動(dòng)物地位的幾點(diǎn)看法[A];資源節(jié)約型、環(huán)境友好型社會(huì)建設(shè)與環(huán)境資源法的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究——2006年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)論文集（一）[C];2006年

7 楊興;李鳳;;關(guān)于制定我國(guó)《動(dòng)物福利法》的思考[A];資源節(jié)約型、環(huán)境友好型社會(huì)建設(shè)與環(huán)境資源法的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究——2006年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)論文集（四）[C];2006年

8 陳葉蘭;許婷;陳f:寅;;動(dòng)物的環(huán)境法律主體資格探討[A];水資源可持續(xù)利用與水生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)的法律問(wèn)題研究——2008年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2008年

9 程樹(shù)軍;周小玲;秦瑤;;皮膚致敏試驗(yàn)動(dòng)物替代方法研究進(jìn)展[A];第十屆中國(guó)實(shí)驗(yàn)動(dòng)物科學(xué)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

10 王，

本文編號(hào)：1776782