天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 碩博論文 > 社科碩士論文 >

正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-21 02:32

  本文選題:正當(dāng)防衛(wèi) 切入點(diǎn):對(duì)象 出處:《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文


【摘要】:刑法中正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象,應(yīng)當(dāng)細(xì)化區(qū)分為正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)行為的直接作用對(duì)象——人的不法侵害行為以及正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)行為導(dǎo)致的利益受損對(duì)象——不法侵害人的利益。當(dāng)兩種防衛(wèi)對(duì)象一致時(shí),第一,對(duì)無責(zé)任能力人的不法侵害行為可以進(jìn)行正當(dāng)防衛(wèi),但是出于人道主義考慮,當(dāng)防衛(wèi)人明確地知道該不法侵害人是無責(zé)任能力人時(shí),在防衛(wèi)強(qiáng)度上應(yīng)當(dāng)有所限制,否則屬于防衛(wèi)過當(dāng);第二,正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象不應(yīng)該包括動(dòng)物,但當(dāng)人的不法侵害行為體現(xiàn)在動(dòng)物的侵害中時(shí),對(duì)動(dòng)物進(jìn)行的反擊實(shí)際上反擊的是人的不法侵害行為,依然可以成立正當(dāng)防衛(wèi);第三,對(duì)于共同犯罪人中的實(shí)行犯、掌控著整個(gè)犯罪活動(dòng)的組織犯、教唆犯可以成為正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象,事中幫助犯也可以成為正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象。當(dāng)兩種防衛(wèi)對(duì)象不一致時(shí),第一,侵害者利用第三人的物以及人身進(jìn)行侵害,防衛(wèi)人毀損該物或傷害他人人身的行為應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定為正當(dāng)防衛(wèi);第二,對(duì)于防衛(wèi)人利用第三人之物進(jìn)行防衛(wèi)的情況,應(yīng)作具體的類型分別處理。第三,防衛(wèi)人利用第三人之人身進(jìn)行防衛(wèi)的情況應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定為故意傷害行為。不同于假想防衛(wèi)中“不存在不法侵害”,有許多防衛(wèi)對(duì)象發(fā)生錯(cuò)誤是以存在不法侵害為前提的,只是由于防衛(wèi)人出于對(duì)象錯(cuò)誤或者方法錯(cuò)誤而導(dǎo)致第三人利益受到損害。對(duì)于這種情況不應(yīng)認(rèn)定為假想防衛(wèi),而應(yīng)按照行為性質(zhì)錯(cuò)誤來進(jìn)行處理。一般地說行為性質(zhì)錯(cuò)誤是事實(shí)錯(cuò)誤,阻卻犯罪故意構(gòu)成過失犯罪,但是防衛(wèi)人防衛(wèi)時(shí)對(duì)其防衛(wèi)行為是否會(huì)精準(zhǔn)打擊不法侵害人把握不大時(shí),如認(rèn)識(shí)到可能傷及第三者合法權(quán)益,持放任態(tài)度的,則應(yīng)構(gòu)成間接故意犯罪。防衛(wèi)人出于緊急避險(xiǎn)的主觀心理,但其行為起到了正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的作用,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定為正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)。
[Abstract]:The object of justifiable defense in criminal law, It should be divided into the direct action object of legitimate defense behavior, the illegal infringement of human beings, and the interest damaged object of legitimate defense behavior-the interests of illegal aggressors. When the two defense objects are the same, first, It can be justified to defend the illegal infringement of the person without the capacity of responsibility, but for humanitarian reasons, when the defender knows clearly that the wrongdoer is an incompetent person, the defense intensity should be limited. Otherwise, it is too defensive; second, the object of legitimate defense should not include animals, but when the illegal act of human aggression is reflected in the animal aggression, the counterattack on the animal is actually the illegal infringement of the human being. Self-defense can still be established; third, for the perpetrators of joint criminals, who control the whole criminal activity, the abettor can become the object of legitimate defense. Aiding offenders can also be the objects of legitimate defense. When the two defense objects are not identical, first, the aggressor uses the objects of the third person and the person to commit an attack. The act of damaging the object or harming the person of the other person shall be regarded as legitimate defense by the defender; second, the situation in which the defender uses the property of the third person for defense should be dealt with separately by specific types. Third, The situation in which a defender uses the person of a third person to defend himself should be regarded as intentional injury. Different from "there is no unlawful infringement" in hypothetical defense, there are many defense objects whose premise is the existence of unlawful infringement. The interests of the third party are only damaged by the fact that the defender has caused harm to the interests of the third party by mistake of object or method. In such a case, it should not be considered as hypothetical defence, It should be dealt with according to the nature of the act. Generally speaking, the nature of the act is a mistake of fact, preventing the crime from deliberately constituting a negligent crime, but when the defender defends himself or not, he does not have a good grasp of whether or not his defence action will accurately attack the wrongdoer. If it is recognized that the legitimate rights and interests of a third party may be injured and laissez-faire, it should constitute an indirect intentional crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳茜;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的對(duì)象研究[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2017年



本文編號(hào):1641868

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1641868.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶edbd3***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com