本文關(guān)鍵詞：不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)錯誤登記的賠償責任　出處：《武漢大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 不動產(chǎn)登記 錯誤登記 賠償責任

【摘要】：不動產(chǎn)登記制度是我國民事法律制度的重要組成部分,《物權(quán)法》設(shè)專章對其進行規(guī)定,就可見一斑,其更首次在立法層面上規(guī)定了不動產(chǎn)登記錯誤的損害賠償責任。然而物權(quán)法對不動產(chǎn)登記錯誤損害賠償?shù)囊?guī)定,更多的是原則性的規(guī)定,就其價值而言,更多的停留在宣誓的層面,《不動產(chǎn)登記暫行條例》(以下簡稱為《暫行條例》)第五章為法律責任,然而卻僅有四個條文,對不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)錯誤登記的賠償責任規(guī)定尚有不足,需要立法予以明確之處不少。本文分為四章:第一章分析了我國在不動產(chǎn)登記賠償責任的條文規(guī)定方面存有的三個不足之處:在不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)審查模式的規(guī)定方面,《暫行條例》及其實施細則之規(guī)定缺乏可操作性,沒有構(gòu)建完善的形式審查配套措施。在賠償責任認定方面,未明確賠償責任的性質(zhì)以及賠償?shù)姆删葷緩?不動產(chǎn)登記賠償責任的歸責原則規(guī)定不明確;在賠償責任承擔方面,錯誤登記導致的賠償范圍不明確,不動產(chǎn)登記賠償責任的歸責原則規(guī)定不明確。第二章探討了不動產(chǎn)登記的審查方式,這是確定不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)承擔賠償責任的前提。本文認為我國應該選擇審慎形式審查模式,并分析了采納該審查模式的理由以及進行審慎形式審查的具體標準�；谛问綄彶楸旧韺Π踩谋Ｕ瞎δ茌^弱,本文認為可以配套規(guī)定強制公證制度,以此實現(xiàn)構(gòu)建形式審查與配套措施相結(jié)合的完善的不動產(chǎn)登記審查制度。第三章,對不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償責任的認定,首先需要明確不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償責任的性質(zhì),本文從四個角度論述其應為民事賠償責任,然后分析了不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償責任的歸責原則,考察關(guān)于登記機構(gòu)賠償責任歸責原則的不同觀點后,認為我國《暫行條例》對此未予規(guī)定,應適用《物權(quán)法》的規(guī)定,將登記機構(gòu)賠償責任的歸責原則確定為無過錯責任原則。第四章主要討論我國不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償責任的承擔,首先考察了域外關(guān)于不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償范圍的不同規(guī)定模式,進而綜合考慮提出觀點,認為我國賠償范圍應采取全額賠償。由于登記機構(gòu)承擔無過錯責任,且需進行全額賠償,故賠償資金的來源保障就顯得尤為重要,本文在分析各種賠償資金來源的利弊得失基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)階段的實際情況,探討我國賠償資金應該采取的來源途徑。
[Abstract]:The real estate registration system is an important part of the civil law system in our country, "property law" stipulated separately, the more remarkable, the first in the legislative level the provisions of the real estate registration error liability for damage. However, the property law of real estate registration provisions error damages. More is the principle, for its value, and more to stay in the level of the oath, "Provisional Regulations on real estate registration" (hereinafter referred to as the "Provisional Regulations >) the fifth chapter is the legal responsibility, but only four provisions of the real estate registration institution registration error liability there is lack of legislation needs to be clear of a lot. This paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the shortcomings in China's three real estate registration provisions of the liability aspects being: in the provisions of the chattel registration review mode," Provisional regulations and the detailed rules for the implementation of the "lack of maneuverability, no construction measures review form perfect. Identified in liability, liability is not clear and the nature of compensation legal remedies, real property registration provisions of the imputation principle of liability is not clear; commitment in terms of liability, scope of compensation error the registration result is not clear, real estate registration provisions of the imputation principle of liability is not clear. The second chapter discusses the real estate registration review, which is the premise to determine the real estate registration institution shall be liable for compensation. This paper argues that our country should choose the form carefully review mode, and analyses the specific standards adopted the review mode and the reason for careful review form. The form of review itself on the security function is weak based on the regulations mandatory notarization system, in order to The construction of formal examination and supporting measures of the combination of the perfect real estate registration system. The third chapter, on the real estate registration agency finds liability, we should make clear the real estate property registration agency liability, this paper from four aspects which should be civil liability, and then analyzed the real property registration agency liability imputation principle, the effects of different views on the registration principle of liability, that the Provisional Regulations of China < > declined provisions should be applicable provisions of "property law", the principle of determining liability of the registration agency liability is no fault liability principle. The fourth chapter the discussion of China's real estate registration compensation liability, first inspects the extraterritorial about real estate registration provisions of different scope of compensation mechanism, and considering that China put forward viewpoint, the scope of compensation should be Take full compensation. Because the registration authorities bear the liability without fault, and the need for full compensation, the compensation funds source of security is particularly important, based on the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of various source of funds for compensation on the basis of combining with the actual situation in our country, to explore the sources of our compensation funds should be taken.

【學位授予單位】：武漢大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙曉魯;;試論我國不動產(chǎn)登記行為的性質(zhì)[J];法制博覽;2016年14期

2 胡嵐;丁再昌;;論我國不動產(chǎn)登記的審查制度[J];商;2015年21期

3 孫文德;;對侵權(quán)責任法中懲罰性賠償?shù)乃伎糩J];法制與社會;2015年14期

4 陳思靜;陳耀東;;不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償責任研究[J];廣西社會科學;2015年02期

5 陸媚;;淺議不動產(chǎn)登記機關(guān)的登記行為及賠償責任性質(zhì)[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2015年02期

6 馬特;;不動產(chǎn)登記條例爭議問題探討[J];理論與改革;2014年04期

7 張星晨;;不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)登記錯誤的賠償責任[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2014年01期

8 劉保玉;;不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)錯誤登記賠償責任的性質(zhì)與形態(tài)[J];中國法學;2012年02期

9 程嘯;;論我國不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)的統(tǒng)一[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2011年13期

10 羅佳意;馮薇薇;;我國不動產(chǎn)登記機構(gòu)賠償負擔模式的選擇[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2010年10期

，

本文編號：1367210