發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-01 19:21

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：雙邊投資條約中根本安全利益例外條款研究　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 雙邊投資條約 根本安全利益 適用范圍 關(guān)聯(lián)度

【摘要】：作為國際投資法的重要組成部分,雙邊投資條約雖因締約國的不同,具體內(nèi)容也存在差異,但在保護(hù)國際投資方面卻起著無可替代的作用。中國的雙邊投資條約締約實(shí)踐雖然起步較晚,但至今行之有效的已達(dá)一百多個(gè)。而且目前仍在與有關(guān)國家就簽訂新雙邊投資條約進(jìn)行談判。不過,雖然中國的雙邊投資條約數(shù)量眾多,但是規(guī)定根本安全利益例外條款的卻為數(shù)不多,且在具體規(guī)定上也較為模糊、籠統(tǒng)。然而,國際投資爭端解決中心近些年的實(shí)踐卻昭示著,根本安全利益例外條款在爭端解決過程中發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用。因此,雙邊投資條約中缺乏對根本安全利益例外條款的具體規(guī)定,無論是對于國際投資爭端的順利解決,還是遏制東道國的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義,都存在著很大的障礙。所以筆者希望通過此文厘清根本安全利益例外條款在適用范圍、關(guān)聯(lián)度和審查等方面所面臨的問題,從而為我國在簽訂的雙邊投資條約中設(shè)置該條款時(shí)提供一定的參考。本文主要是對雙邊投資條約中根本安全利益例外條款進(jìn)行研究。全文共分為四大部分:第一部分是根本安全利益例外條款實(shí)踐及該條款與相關(guān)免除條款的區(qū)別。首先,通過一個(gè)涉及根本安全利益例外條款的案例,引出該條款目前在適用上存在的問題。其次,對其名稱加以規(guī)范,并且就其與危急情況、公共目的、情勢變更等相關(guān)免除條款進(jìn)行區(qū)分,以達(dá)到真正理解這一條款的目的。第二部分是雙邊投資條約和國際投資協(xié)定中的根本安全利益例外條款。首先,介紹了發(fā)展中國家印度和發(fā)達(dá)國家美國的雙邊投資條約中根本安全利益例外條款的設(shè)置現(xiàn)狀。其次,介紹了區(qū)域性投資協(xié)定中的北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定和WTO法律文件中有關(guān)根本安全利益例外條款的規(guī)定。并通過對比分析,探討其設(shè)置上存在的差異。第三部分是雙邊投資條約中根本安全利益例外條款法律問題分析。主要是對當(dāng)前根本安全利益例外條款在適用范圍、關(guān)聯(lián)度、審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及可賠償性等幾個(gè)爭議較大的問題進(jìn)行了探討,在法律的層面上對這些問題進(jìn)行界定,并針對這些問題給出自己的答案。第四部分是中外雙邊投資條約中的根本安全利益例外條款。首先是介紹了中國在雙邊投資條約中設(shè)置根本安全利益例外條款的現(xiàn)狀及其存在問題。其次,針對這些問題,就我國今后在設(shè)置這一條款時(shí)提出自己的建議。
[Abstract]:As an important part of international investment law, bilateral investment treaties (bits) have different contents according to different contracting parties. However, it plays an irreplaceable role in the protection of international investment. China's bilateral investment treaty contracting practice started late. But so far more than 100 have worked. Negotiations are still under way with the countries concerned to sign new bits. However, although China has a large number of bits. However, there are few exceptions to the fundamental security interests, and the specific provisions are vague and general. However, the practice of the International Centre for the settlement of Investment disputes in recent years is clear. Exceptions to fundamental security interests play a more and more important role in the process of dispute settlement. Therefore, there is a lack of specific provisions on exceptions to fundamental security interests in bits. Whether for the smooth settlement of international investment disputes, or to curb the host country of trade protectionism, there are great obstacles, so I hope to clarify the basic security interests in the scope of application through this article. The related degree and the examination and so on aspect faces the question. This paper mainly studies the basic security interest exception clause in the bilateral investment treaty. The whole paper is divided into four parts:. The first part is the practice of the fundamental security interest exception clause and the difference between the clause and the relevant exemption clause. First of all. Through a case involving the exception clause of fundamental security interests, it leads to the existing problems in the application of this provision. Secondly, it regulates its name and, with regard to necessity, the public purpose. The second part is the fundamental security interest exception clause in bilateral investment treaties and international investment agreements. This paper introduces the status quo of the establishment of the basic security interest exception clause in the bilateral investment treaty between India and the United States of America in the developing countries and developed countries. Secondly. This paper introduces the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the regional investment agreements and the provisions of the WTO legal documents concerning the exceptions to fundamental security interests. The third part is the legal analysis of the basic security interest exception clause in the bilateral investment treaty. It is mainly about the scope of application and the relevance of the basic security interest exception clause. Several controversial issues, such as review criteria and compensability, are discussed, and these issues are defined at the legal level. The 4th part is the basic security interest exception clause in the Chinese and foreign bilateral investment treaty. Firstly, it introduces the basic security interest exception clause in china's bilateral investment treaty. Current situation and existing problems. Secondly. In view of these problems, our country in the future in the establishment of this article put forward their own suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張菊輝,康衛(wèi)東;論關(guān)貿(mào)總協(xié)定中的例外條款和限制性措施[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年02期

2 任潔;關(guān)貿(mào)總協(xié)定的基本規(guī)則及其例外條款[J];w蕓，

本文編號：1365860