德勒茲生成文學思想研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-22 11:06
【摘要】：本文旨在通過對德勒茲(和瓜塔里)論述文學的著作和材料的細讀與梳理,以生成思想為核心,試圖比較系統(tǒng)地繪制出德勒茲的文學思想和觀念。本文對德勒茲文學理論的構建從兩條線索展開,一是通過突破語言的界限,創(chuàng)造語言的新功能實現(xiàn)生成文學創(chuàng)作,二是通過瓦解主體的虛假統(tǒng)一性,不斷生成他者進行生成文學創(chuàng)作。最后指出,生成文學創(chuàng)作的前提是明確生成的基礎,其次是創(chuàng)造有效的生成通道。同時指明,生成文學沒有自己的文學史,具有一定的實用價值和政治意義。 本文首先勾勒德勒茲的生平及學術思想軌跡,初步明晰生成思想在他哲學思想中的位置。繼而圍繞生成思想對國內(nèi)外的相關研究資料進行梳理,廓清德勒茲文學研究現(xiàn)狀,然后闡明本文選題的思路及研究內(nèi)容,確立從生成角度研究德勒茲文學思想的合理性和可行性。德勒茲明確指出,生成文學的獨特性在于文學可以通過創(chuàng)造感覺聚塊進行創(chuàng)造,這樣的感覺聚塊必須是給予人們?nèi)碌捏w驗,為人與人、社會和世界之間的思考方式提供新的橋梁。從德勒茲的論述生成文學的材料看,生成文學不是文學創(chuàng)作手法的創(chuàng)制,而是通過文學的方式對強勢存在和權力系統(tǒng)不斷弱化的結果。語言在具體的應用中,和社會權力形成同構,從而獲得表達的合法性。生成文學在文學空間中通過創(chuàng)造新的語言形式和用法,在突破合法語言表達形式的同時,也動搖了與之同構的社會配置,這種新的語言表達形式,形成了弱勢文學的獨特文學現(xiàn)象,創(chuàng)造了去—物質性的符號世界,配置出一部多樣體的文學機器,既構建了一個新的藝術空間,同時也指涉著尚未成形的社會權力形式。在對主體權威性地位的攻擊中,生成文學通過生成—動物取消了人類自身的同一性,通過生成—女人動搖了男性中心秩序的合法性,通過不斷生成—難以感知者,不斷突破人類感知方式的閾限,為世界創(chuàng)造和增添全新的維度。 本文的結論是,生成文學是一種全新的文學現(xiàn)象,明確生成的基礎是進行生成文學創(chuàng)作的前提,確定生成的通道和策略是生成文學創(chuàng)作的關鍵。生成文學沒有自己的文學史,是一種不合時宜的實用主義文學,它具有潛在的革命性與社會價值。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to make a detailed reading and combing of the works and materials of Deleuze (and Guatari) on literature, taking the generative thought as the core, and trying to draw out Deleuze's literary thoughts and ideas in a more systematic way. In this paper, the construction of Deleuze's literary theory starts from two clues: one is to create literary creation by breaking through the boundary of language and to create new functions of language, and the other is to disintegrate the false unity of the subject. The generation of the other is the creation of literary creation. Finally, it is pointed out that the premise of generating literary creation is the basis of explicit generation, followed by the creation of effective generation channels. At the same time, it is pointed out that the generation of literature has certain practical value and political significance without its own literary history. This paper first outlines Deleuze's life and academic thoughts, and clarifies the position of generative thought in his philosophical thought. Then combing the relevant research materials at home and abroad around the generative thought, clarifying the current situation of Deleuze literature research, and then clarifying the ideas and research content of this topic. To establish the rationality and feasibility of the study of Deleuze's literary thought from the perspective of generation. Deleuz made it clear that the uniqueness of creating literature is that it can be created by creating sensory chunks, which must give people a new experience and be personal. The way of thinking between society and the world provides a new bridge. From the point of view of the materials from which Deleuze discusses the creation of literature, the generation of literature is not the creation of literary creation techniques, but the result of the strong existence and the weakening of power system through the way of literature. Language in concrete application, and social power form isomorphism, thus obtain the legitimacy of expression. By creating new forms of language and usage in literary space, the generation of literature breaks through the legal forms of language expression, and at the same time shakes the social configuration of its isomorphism, which is a new form of language expression. It has formed the unique literary phenomenon of weak literature, created the symbolic world of de- materiality, and configured a literary machine of various forms, which not only constructs a new artistic space, but also refers to the form of social power that has not yet taken shape at the same time. In the attack on the authoritative position of the subject, the generative literature removes the identity of the human being by generation-animal, by generation-woman shakes the legitimacy of the male-centered order, by constantly generating the unperceptible. Constantly breaking through the threshold of human perception, creating and adding new dimensions to the world. The conclusion of this paper is that the generation of literature is a new literary phenomenon, and the basis of creation is the premise of literary creation, and the key to the creation of literature is to determine the channel and strategy of generation. Generating literature without its own literary history is an anachronistic pragmatic literature with potential revolutionary and social value.
【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I109
本文編號：2137240
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to make a detailed reading and combing of the works and materials of Deleuze (and Guatari) on literature, taking the generative thought as the core, and trying to draw out Deleuze's literary thoughts and ideas in a more systematic way. In this paper, the construction of Deleuze's literary theory starts from two clues: one is to create literary creation by breaking through the boundary of language and to create new functions of language, and the other is to disintegrate the false unity of the subject. The generation of the other is the creation of literary creation. Finally, it is pointed out that the premise of generating literary creation is the basis of explicit generation, followed by the creation of effective generation channels. At the same time, it is pointed out that the generation of literature has certain practical value and political significance without its own literary history. This paper first outlines Deleuze's life and academic thoughts, and clarifies the position of generative thought in his philosophical thought. Then combing the relevant research materials at home and abroad around the generative thought, clarifying the current situation of Deleuze literature research, and then clarifying the ideas and research content of this topic. To establish the rationality and feasibility of the study of Deleuze's literary thought from the perspective of generation. Deleuz made it clear that the uniqueness of creating literature is that it can be created by creating sensory chunks, which must give people a new experience and be personal. The way of thinking between society and the world provides a new bridge. From the point of view of the materials from which Deleuze discusses the creation of literature, the generation of literature is not the creation of literary creation techniques, but the result of the strong existence and the weakening of power system through the way of literature. Language in concrete application, and social power form isomorphism, thus obtain the legitimacy of expression. By creating new forms of language and usage in literary space, the generation of literature breaks through the legal forms of language expression, and at the same time shakes the social configuration of its isomorphism, which is a new form of language expression. It has formed the unique literary phenomenon of weak literature, created the symbolic world of de- materiality, and configured a literary machine of various forms, which not only constructs a new artistic space, but also refers to the form of social power that has not yet taken shape at the same time. In the attack on the authoritative position of the subject, the generative literature removes the identity of the human being by generation-animal, by generation-woman shakes the legitimacy of the male-centered order, by constantly generating the unperceptible. Constantly breaking through the threshold of human perception, creating and adding new dimensions to the world. The conclusion of this paper is that the generation of literature is a new literary phenomenon, and the basis of creation is the premise of literary creation, and the key to the creation of literature is to determine the channel and strategy of generation. Generating literature without its own literary history is an anachronistic pragmatic literature with potential revolutionary and social value.
【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I109
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 莫言;文學創(chuàng)作的民間資源——在蘇州大學“小說家講壇”上的講演[J];當代作家評論;2002年01期
2 陳永國;德勒茲思想要略[J];外國文學;2004年04期
3 黃文前;;德勒茲和加塔利精神分裂分析的基本概念及其特點[J];國外理論動態(tài);2007年10期
4 于奇智;后現(xiàn)代思想家G．德勒茲[J];國外社會科學;1996年05期
5 呂翔;德勒茲與經(jīng)驗主義形而上學[J];蘭州學刊;2004年03期
6 莫言,楊揚;小說是越來越難寫了[J];南方文壇;2004年01期
7 程黨根;異域中的異樣主體之維——德勒茲視域中的后現(xiàn)代主體模式[J];南京社會科學;2003年06期
8 伊莎貝拉·伽霍爾;夏瑩;;德勒茲、馬克思與革命:如何理解“仍是馬克思主義者”的內(nèi)涵[J];江海學刊;2010年05期
9 鄒廣文;;如何進入哲學的思考[J];理論視野;2012年11期
10 潘于旭;;德勒茲的差異與文本革命[J];青海社會科學;2006年03期
，本文編號：2137240
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2137240.html
